this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
8 points (90.0% liked)

Anarchism

3339 readers
26 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
8
Humanism and the Inhumanity of Transhumanism (anarchistnews.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There is a—much worse—far right version of transhumanism. It has been promoted by a sector of the capitalist class. This is the Silicon Valley “tech bros,” leaders of the “billionaire class,” and its well-paid minions.

In this vision, we will have nannites in our blood and computers surgically placed in our heads, so we can take orders from the Master Computer. A Marxist economist explains, “Transhumanism asserts that humans can transcend existing biological limitations with the aid of technology to achieve indefinitely long life-spans and augmented cognitive abilities….AGI [Artificial General Intelligence] [is] generating such rapid and unprecedented technological advances that there will be a fundamental rupture in human history….Humans will eventually upload their consciousness to robots, creating self-improving super beings that will, in great numbers, establish themselves throughout the universe.” (Hart-Landsberg 2026; p. 115)

This is an image of totally alienated humans, with machines like people and people turned into machines. It imagines the abolition of the working class. This might be a humorous caricature of modern capitalism—or an imaginative piece of science fiction—if leading billionaires did not take it so seriously.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AGI [Artificial General Intelligence] [is] generating such rapid and unprecedented technological advances that there will be a fundamental rupture in human history.

This doesn't exist. There are bots that appear to be "general purpose" but are in fact amalgamations of multiple bots running as a unit. We don't have AGI, and if capitalism keeps up the way it is (why wouldn't it?), what the tech bros are doing will cause their efforts to collapse under their collective weight.

The author does not seem well informed about what AI is and seems to have bought into a lot of the doomsayer marketing regarding AI's capabilities.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I must point out that you and I are merely an amalgamation of multiple consciousness and systems running as a unit.

I do not in any way support the tech bros or their destruction of humanity. I just want to be honest about how close that "amalgamation of multiple bots" can get to functioning in place of a human worker, and an amalgamation is closer to the mark than a single "master program" running everything would be.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I must point out that you and I are merely an amalgamation of multiple consciousness and systems running as a unit.

Kindly, I don't accept this premise, so I reject the conclusion. Most people aren't systems of unique consciousnesses (excepting people with DID; I see y'all). Most are a singular consciousness that can perform a variety of tasks.

You might perhaps mean that we are a collection of systems, which I'd accept, but that's not analogous to what AI is doing by combining the computational work of multiple instances of AI. My hand doesn't require its own brain to move or manipulate a hammer. My legs and feet don't need their own brains working in tandem to walk. There isn't some kind of secondary marshaling brain that handles communication between our organs and extremities.

No, all of that is handled by a single organ, and it can do all of that with the power of a small 20W lightbulb.

Though maybe I missed your point, so feel free to clarify if I've mischaracterized something.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kindly, I don't accept this premise

You are ofc, free to believe whatever you want. This isn't just "my premise" though. It is the biological reality. I didn't just make this up myself and start believing it.

My hand doesn't require its own brain to move or manipulate a hammer. My legs and feet don't need their own brains working in tandem to walk.

They do. You have a little brain that makes your legs go. A doctor demonstrates this by hitting your knee with a little hammer. You can decide to not call that a brain, but there are animals with that much brain for the whole organism.

There is another one your arms are hooked to, but we have no fun hammer tricks to show you that in a non-invasive setting.

There isn't some kind of secondary marshaling brain that handles communication between our organs and extremities.

There is. We can annihilate everything that you would consider "you", and that brain would still handle all communication between your organs and extremities. Your body would still function normally.

No, all of that is handled by a single organ, and it can do all of that with the power of a small 20W lightbulb.

Completely incorrect. All of that is handled by numerous nested information processing networks, each of which can function completely on their own so long as the conditions for their survival (oxygen, sugar, etc) are met.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They do. You have a little brain that makes your legs go. A doctor demonstrates this by hitting your knee with a little hammer.

That's called a somatic reflex. It doesn't function on its own and requires external input to do anything (be it a brain or a small mallet). In the case of your knees, it contains a nerve sensor that sends a signal to your spinal cord, which responds with a signal to the motor neurons in your leg muscles. It's not doing that action independent of your brain, and people with paralysis in their legs do not have this reaction.

There is. We can annihilate everything that you would consider "you", and that brain would still handle all communication between your organs and extremities.

Still a singular brain, which was my point. The "self" isn't relevant.

All of that is handled by numerous nested information processing networks, each of which can function completely on their own so long as the conditions for their survival (oxygen, sugar, etc) are met.

Still not analogous to AI. A bunch of sensor nerves that still communicate back to the central brain that fire synapses in the brain is not analogous to AI matrices. The mechanisms that make up our cognition and reactions are deterministic, whereas AI logic is pseudorandom. It's why you can ask an AI a question multiple times and get a different answer each time. It's why AI has a hallucination problem.

Also, just because you could hypothetically keep a hand and its nerves alive doesn't mean it will become Thing from The Adams Family. The nerves there will not become brains, and even if the sensory neurons continue working, they won't be sending any information to the motor neurons in the fingers. They are wholly dependent upon the central brain, not at all like a bunch of standalone AI systems working in concert.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This whole idea of a central computer style brain hooked into dumb synapses is very outdated. There is a wealth of information on this subject that has been developed over the last three decades if you want to study the science.

It doesn't function on its own and requires external input to do anything

Are you under the impression that your brain would have done anything of note if it never received external input? Without external input your brain would have produced nothing more than static, to the point that your organs would have eventually shut down.

Still a singular brain, which was my point. The "self" isn't relevant.

I think maybe we're hitting upon a terminology mismatch. There is one thing called a "brain". I agree.

This brain is made up of many smaller, independent, information processing subsystems. This is more analogous to "a bunch of autoregressive transformers snooshed together" than it is analogous to "a single system for processing all information".

Any system that seeks to recreate human cognition will have to do so with "a bunch of independent systems for processing information, squished together", and not "a single master program, like we thought in the 1800s".

[–] cice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

real transhumanism is about augmenting human capabilities, releive disabilities and transcend death and the conditions of our existence. the far right only co-opted this concept because they want their dictators to be eternal, nothing new

[–] PatrikSpurzem@social.cologne 1 points 2 weeks ago

@technocrit die Möglichkeiten der Teilhabe im Transhumanismus sind humaner als der heute existente Humanismus.