this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
373 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31167 readers
1905 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

John fetterman died from a fatal stroke a few years ago.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Perfect example of brain damage making some one conservative

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

He was a dumb fuck before that. He’s alway been a GOP shill.

Fetterman chases black jogger with shotgun

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

I don't think any of this had to do with his stroke directly. I think he is compromised. I think there is a skeleton in his closet that cannot come out, and he is doing anything and everything asked of him to prevent that.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 86 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The man literally had a stroke that caused brain damage and he woke up a conservative. 🤷‍♂️

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wasn’t there a study on this - brain damage decreases empathy and so you become a conservative.

[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As much as I liked the "massive brain damage causes conservatism" narrative following Fetterman around, I've been hearing more and more that he was always a duplicitous asshole.

Our country needs a way to recall public servants when they betray constituents. Six years is too long to wait.

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 4 points 17 hours ago

It’s a state-by-state option depending on their laws. Time to run for local offices and change the rules.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure. His own staff has been abandoning him in droves. I supported him during the election and he without question changed. Was there a conservative quality to him to begin with? Sure, but he was closer to Sanders than Manchin. Unlike Sinema who was just an agent like Gabbard, I do think the stroke heavily exacerbated what little conservatism he had

[–] zidanerick@lemmy.patton.id.au 10 points 1 day ago

The amount of lead exposure during your life would also contribute to this I feel, we are fucked until money gets out of politics as it seems it's currently a DEI for older/damaged folk. Why do people have to have a fitness test to go and die but our people in charge don't even have to have a physical in most cases.

[–] joseki@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He literally said in an interview that he felt the progressivism flowing out of his body when it happened

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

All conservatives have brain damage. Many are just born with it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would explain the rightwing shift that some people go through in their very old age.

Maybe conservatism is just an early sign of dementia or other kinds of brain damage.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a lot of that conservatism simply shows that they were always an awful person.

Like, when you're young and you have no money, if you're a greedy fuck, then you're a progressive. "I want other people to give me money."

But when you're old and you have already made your money, and you're still a greedy fuck, then you're a conservative. "I don't want to give my money to other people."

You don't really care about politics. You just care about yourself and your money.

I think sometimes people forget that, even if you're on the good team, you'll almost certainly have a lot of bad people on your team.

[–] frightful5680@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

When I'm old you can have my money 💰

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know right! He’s been a bad Dem since his incident! Maybe even before…

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

According to some, he was like this before the stroke. He was just against Dr. Oz at the time and he'll make anyone else look sane.

[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I remember people liking him because he was an asshole on our side, sticking it to Republicans. I guess an asshole on your side is still, at the end of the day, an asshole. In other words, by no means should Democrats nominate Gavin Newsom for president.

The stroke removed his hatred of Dr Oz?

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just upvoted to gain the majority! 50 + 1

He puts the F in etterman. Ffs

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're not familiar with him, here is an interview with fetterman by Jon Stewart. He goes off the rails about half way. When Jon pressed him, things got wacky. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3BMAkJIlnw

This video may be painful to watch. He obviously received a severe mental disability.

[–] joseki@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blue team just needs to keep him in the party until the next election. Until then, he votes with the blue team on judge appointments over 95% of the time. If that's the only worthwhile thing he's gonna do I'll take it until he gets the boot. Red team isn't going to take him either. Sad how a brain injury can derail your life.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Even his wife doesn't seem to think he's the same guy.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this article from 3 years ago by mistake?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Something that's become readily apparent since Trump's first term is that many people are just slow as fuck to notice blatantly obvious things.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, they’re only realizing this NOW??

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I imagine the sticker shock one gets from tanking up at a gas station is waking up a lot of zombies from their deep slumber about a great many things.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

In a way, it makes sense. Same donors. Why wouldn’t some of them get bought off post election? The money in legislators is the entire game.

I’m not defending it, I’m pointing out how obvious it is that this would happen since most elections are oligarch influenced. Oh, the oligarch lost? Money just gets more direct now. Probably. To make sure each vote goes their way. No other reason for these anti-American assholes to switch party lines.

It’s probably why they’re so rabid about people like AOC, Bernie, and Mamdani. They can’t buy them off.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Good. He is not to be trusted now.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

People should be able to not just have a politician recalled. If you get enough signatures, you should be able to have them executed for treason at the State level. Id say put it on every election ballot, should the current or previous house of this office be investigated for treason?

load more comments
view more: next ›