this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
432 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31138 readers
1973 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has once again stepped up his threats to entirely wipe out Iran, but it somehow isn’t forcing Iran to make the deal he wants. The emptiness of the threats is embarrassing enough. But now, CBS News has published a series of extraordinary photographs of American bases and equipment abroad badly damaged by Iranian attacks. These pictures were leaked by anonymous U.S. service-members who did this because the truth about Trump’s war is being suppressed. As one put it: “This is major damage to our ba...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blastosist@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone support this guy anymore? All the maga dupes in my life have gone silent or are suddenly “ not interested in politics “.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 3 points 6 hours ago

They still support. They just don't have any quips to say when the economy has so obviously gone bad.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Krasnov's conception of strength follows Project 2025 and whatever the damn Muscovites want him to do.

[–] Bla@lemmy.cafe 9 points 11 hours ago

The cost of all that - is not soaked up by staff of military, or private firms or by politicians. The costs are passed on to citizens. Every plane down, or fuel burnt is paid for by public money..

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

It's wild, man. For like twenty years I was arguing with anyone who would listen that going to war with Iran would be a really shitty idea. And yet I'm not very satisfied to have been proven right.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

The AI safety talk this week is meant from distracting from both the failure in Iran, and inaction in resolving (just leave in great victory mission accomplished speech). Simultaneously lowers Bond villain AI as a divisive midterm issue, even when GOP calls them "the same woke left who warned against global warming and covid" is not necessarily a winning mid term strategy for GOP, but may be less bleeding than talking about Iran failure. I still expect "mission accomplished withdrawal" after mid terms. You need collapsing energy and bond prices now to avoid debating Trump/Iran failure.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What happened, did a bomb hit them mid sentence?

As one put it: “This is major damage to our ba... BOOOM!!

[–] notabot@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago

That made me chuckle too. A fine example of unintentional humour.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago

Even without the leaks, and because it's trump, everyone already assumes heinous shit is occurring.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Ha! The stroke picture!

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Is that Kash Patel's son?

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

this goes hard!

idk why they put a blury picture of an old loser as the articles picture instead of the actual news

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Undated photo of plane damaged by Iranian strikes at Prince Sultan AFB, Saudi Arabia

Damaged lol

[–] bonesawmcl@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How many AWACS do the US forces have?

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We'll just buy more, what can they cost, like 10 dollars?

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How many health cares is this plane?

[–] Nonprophet@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

The only response we are going to get from the administration is to go after the soldiers who leaked the photos... all the while calling the pics 'fake news'

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It was never supposed to be successful in the first place. Trump and his merry band of criminals already got exactly what they wanted out of this.

He’s on record stating he doesn’t give a shit about what people are going through because of the war, the tarriffs, or any of his schemes designed to line his pockets.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 15 hours ago

And avoid his degeneracy being truly known. That is his biggest motivator. The "trump/epstein" brand is here to stay. We just need to put out all of his deflecting fires beforehand.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The war just needs to last until the midterms

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This war isn't going away for years. The empire won't admit they lost, they won't double down, and they can't destroy Iran as is.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect the plan is for the war to disappear after the midterms. Whether Iran will agree to this is something completely different.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

I mean, what little plan there was seemed to honestly think they'd get Venezuela pt 2.

Instead, they've now lost the Middle East, and all the data I'm seeing seems to suggest Iran is as strong militarily as when they started, while the US has destroyed years of production and shown the world it's a paper tiger with gold plated betamax machines.

Considering how much the US makes selling arms overseas, that's a business problem as well as a military one now.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The price of Russian oil is all that really matters. It doesn't look like it's going to even help them though. That and getting the Abraham Lincoln away from the Baltic.

The extremely non strategic retreat from the Middle East is kind of wild though. I'd have thought Trump was the very definition of blood for oil.

It does seem like they've gotten away with six months more than they expected to.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago

he just won't pay American blood for oil. Iranian kids, no problem.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A mostly complacent media not willing to ask tough questions is part of the problem of why we don't hear about this stuff as much as we should be.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

The media isn’t complacent, it is cowed / controlled by Trump supporting billionaires. To call them merely complacent is flattery.

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 124 points 1 day ago (16 children)

imagine raising a kid for 18 years only to have him/her go overseas and get blown up in the most pointless bullshit war in history. for the purpose of making a whiny weak loser con man reality tv failure look like he's tough

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago

Sounds like they raised a stupid kid

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Also to distract from the discussion about how he molested children.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 30 points 1 day ago

These are the kind of idiots who think they can win a fight by just wildly swinging their arms in every direction. Meanwhile, the opponent just keeps his distance, takes a few easy swings when there's an opportunity, and waits for the Idiot to wear himself out. Then the opponent steps in a finishes the job. Or maybe the Idiot just falls down out of sheer exhaustion.

Either way, we're the Idiot.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

With this headline, you could replace "Iran" with "pants"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›