this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
270 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87980 readers
2361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WillieShen@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Considering the amount of Apple devices in the wild, I guess what I talk physically to people will be mostly recorded then, not to mention that Google assistant or smth like that maybe doing the same, what a Brave New World.

[–] carton_of_lions@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have an older smart watch and it's starting to get a little tired, I'll be replacing it with an actual watch that only tells the time and date, so sick of all smart things

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I got a withings watch as a gift. More or less a standard analogue type watch with health tracking and minor notification support.

Could be worth looking into if you don’t want to go cold turkey.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Just did this myself. I had a collection of regular watches that I went back to and I’m loving it.

I also just bought a DAP for music and already have an XTEink X4 ereader. Slowly moving to get rid of a mart phone all together.

[–] imminent_nebula@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Same here! I've been moving away from all-in-one tech to devices that only do one thing and do it well, usually with wires lol. Wired headphones in a DAP (Hi-Fi Walker) that I also plug into the car, old Sony e-reader that still holds a battery charge for a month, analogue watches, disconnected TVs, pen and paper notebooks, etc. I plug in when I can and avoid bluetooth.

It's interesting, I've since changed my behaviour from buying the flashiest, coolest-looking items to focus on how well they work over how they look. Function over form. Sure, my things are less flashy and uglier, but I see a real charm to them now. It's also driven me to retro-tech and loving using things that get worn looking and used.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I use wall clocks and computers. Haven't worn a watch in forever.

[–] ZebulonP@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How does this not violate 2-party consent?

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corporations are allowed to do whatever they want, whenever they want. There might be a few tiny consequences 10-20 years later that shaves a couple months of profit down, but that is just the cost of business and massive profits for the rest of the time.

Hope this helps!

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Just like all these AI companies tracking people, totally illegal and gross violation of privacy but the government could give a rip.

You break a law? Go straight to jail!

Corporation breaks a law? Ohhh well!

[–] thatOneGuy@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is probably some technicality in that since it doesn’t record audio, but rather just keeps a transcription - that it might not fall afoul of two-party consent?

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if it is only temporarily stored to RAM for processing, I struggle to see how that doesn't still count as "recording".

[–] thatOneGuy@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It probably wouldn’t meet the strict legal definition, as no copy (physical or digital) is left behind for any period of time - as RAM is volatile and its contents disappear on power cycle.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

The Hey Siri does the same thing it's just all on-device.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Or it probably would, they just have no plan to stop it unless they get sued and a judge forces them

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not every country or country subdivision has two party consent. Canada is a one party consent legislation.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The question was not "what countries do not have two party consent?" The question was "how does this not violate two party consent?"

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago

It violates it

[–] ZebulonP@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I understand that. What about the places that do?

[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I'm guessing they'll put the responsibility on the user to only activate it when it has the consent of people around it or something...

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Won’t exist there

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

They can disable it based on geolocation, or like others said, put the onus on the user to know best.

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember when they used to say if you didn't pay for the product it was because you were the product? Now-a-days you get to pay to be the product.

[–] liinux@pawb.social 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

And unironically people enjoy that because it "give" them status

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Surveillance capitalism fucking sucks. Can we all go back to the 90's or early 2000's?

The worst thing about this is how ubiquitous Apple watches are. Now everybody who has one is going to have people suspecting them of being unwitting surveillance meat drones.

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Man, my work is going to ban apple watches so fast based on this.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Same. Which is hilarious because we're an Apple organization mostly.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

How many times has Strava leaked secret military base coordinates?

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks Siri Recaps!

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

But add an always-listening AI assistant into the mix who's taking notes on your day-to-day, including your conversations with others who may not know they're being surveilled, and suddenly Apple's latest handy feature starts to look a lot creepier. Apple's other big new Audio Intelligence feature for watches is Live Rewind, which can produce a transcript of the last 15 seconds of audio on your watch face — whether a wake word was said, or not.

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I won’t say it’s not* a privacy nightmare but doesn’t Apple devices process this whole thing on-device? I don’t find it fair to compare this with Meta anything (and only that).

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes and no company has ever broken its promise or gotten hacked. Nothing stays safe forever. As soon as some AI company makes a future deal for that data your privacy does not matter. Apples been caught before violating privacy laws.

[–] valar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

You can't trust any corporation to keep your data safe and local. They lie about not sending it elsewhere, and even when they don't, all it takes is one security breech, which every company has all the damn time.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Ok, but prior to this, the listening thing was at least a separate device. Now it can be a watch or sun glasses or your tv...

[–] Snickeboa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Plus is doesn’t store the audio nor an infinite log. It just continuously stores the last 15 seconds to my understanding. Meaning, what was said and transcribed 30 seconds ago is no longer accessible.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

The Live Audio is only 15 seconds before it is overwritten. The Transcribe is 7 days before it is overwritten.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t give a fuck. Your stupid dweeb watch is just another antisocial surveillance device.

[–] Snickeboa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What the fuck is that response? I don’t own an Apple Watch or anything. I’m just trying to put forth actual facts for the discussion.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

It isn't enough to be privacy conscious. Now the apyijg follows you anywhere you have contact with other people