this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
174 points (97.8% liked)

News

39080 readers
1410 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance could provide neither a timeline for the Iran war to end nor a date when gas prices might sink below pre-war levels during a White House appearance Thursday, suggesting instead it was up to Iran to conclude the conflict that began with joint US-Israeli airstrikes six months ago.

The current hostilities shouldn’t even be called a “war,” Vance argued, since “active combat operations” ended months ago.

“Right now, there is no active shooting,” Vance insisted, despite three consecutive days this week when the US and Iran exchanged fire, including around the Strait of Hormuz.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

The rest of the world wonders when this non war will end so that the painful economic consequences will stop.

[–] pbhj@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Well, so long as the Secretary of War isn't involved, then it's probably not a war ...

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 4 points 5 hours ago

All you Negative Nellies are so eager to dunk on the VP that you can't even hear his point. Sure, there's a "conflict," sure, our militaries are "shooting and bombing and trying to kill each other," but you've missed the important thing, which is all the peace that's happening. See, there was a moment of peace just then. And here's another moment when no one is shooting now. And here -- uh wait, wait just a moment -- here's another moment of peace now.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The Vietnam war was also not called a war, it was called a police action. It seems the Executive Branch's ability to wage war without congress's approval is a constitutional loophole.

Edited for clarity

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Even G.W. knew better than to try and take Iran. And he put us in two forever wars!

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

A special military operation maybe.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago

Just for a three days.

Ah. Say you're a war mongering dictatorship without saying you're the same as Putin and co.

[–] joyjoy@piefed.social 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's a forever ~~war~~ special military operation.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 10 points 17 hours ago

Did Russia forget to defend their trademark?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

He's not even a very convincing puppet.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cnn calling it a conflict in the headline, instead of the war that it actually is, is just proving Vance's false point

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

CNN has been a shitty, garbage company for at least two decades now.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think there might have been some difference of opinion between the article+URL author and the editor given the URL says war lol

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Department of Little Excursions

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I'm beyond caring what Trump says now, but I never cared what Vance said.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Edgar Bergen and Mortimer Snerd (Peter Thiel and Shady Vance). Apologies to Edgar Bergen...and Mortimer Snerd.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

We can't do shit about it though. Fucking traitors in Congress.

[–] AmazingSUPERG@thelemmy.club 5 points 23 hours ago

Its a Moneypit.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Republicans would have to pay widows and orphans benefits if it was a war…

Soldiers are just expendable. No cost once they are gone.

[–] tangeli@piefed.social 3 points 23 hours ago

Definitely not a war. Just some tit-for-tat shenanigans. A little fun blowing things up. Can't stop the boys getting up to some hijinks now and then.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 2 points 23 hours ago

When what will end?