this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
414 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

2634 readers
760 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I don’t understand how we were treating the US unfairly by selling commodities the US upsold and exported while watching our own defence and manufacturing industries wither and die.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 weeks ago

We're not. They're just taking a tantrum because we don't bend at the knee for Sir Shitsalot.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

He doesn’t care about facts. He thinks in stereotypes and assumes Canada is a bunch of ope pushovers. He’ll find out.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not like we have a choice.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

There's a special place in heaven for animal lovers, that's what I always say.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I've never really heard anyone pronounce it like aboot (as in "rain boots). More like abeut (as in beutiful) or abowt (as in 'bow down'). Is it because I'm from Ontario?

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've got a theory about that. As someone from the US, I've tried pronouncing "about" the way people from Ontario do... and it's really hard. It's a sound we just don't make in our accent. Which is why I suspect that so many Americans say that you say "aboot" - not because you literally say "aboot," but because it's the closest approximation many of us can make to your pronunciation.

In other words, it's a skill issue on our part.

[–] trebach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe it's me or which province's media I'm listening to but I hear something closer to "aboat".

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I can’t speak for others, but out here on the west coast, I say it more like “a-bow-oot”. I could then see how it morphs into the stereotypical “a-boot”.

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

As a west coaster, I assumed it is, like most of the dumber stereotypes, a Quebec/maritimes thing.

Other than bagged milk, which I know is your fault.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fault???? You mean gift to the world, eh?

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One can freeze the bags. 🙂

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

You can freeze jugs too, doesn't mean they are any less cursed!

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wiktionary says that there's no variant of the Canadian pronunciation that's actually ‘aboot’.

[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

There's no will to fight Canada in the US. No one can articulate what the actual goal is, beyond vague unfairness. Meanwhile, the Canadian government here has ~75% cross partisan support for walking away from the table.

Or to put it in words MAGA might understand: it ain't the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In fairness, David in this metaphor is probably the guy in the Levant knocking out predator drones with a slingshot.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Obligatory reminder that a sling was actually pretty much a gun of its time, easily capable of killing a guy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are a few differences

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Accuracy, for starters.

Rate of fire is another big one.

Killing someone with a single sling stone is significantly more impressive than with a pistol.

Re: @mobyduck648@lemmy.world

The lesson I think is less ‘the weak can defeat the strong’ in general and ‘don’t engage your enemy on his terms, engage him where you are strongest’.

David wasn't the only Jewish soldier with access to sling stone technology.

I think the moral of David v Goliath is supposed to be "corporal strength is no match for divine providence"

If David had missed, nobody would be talking about him - except, perhaps, as a cautionary tale about hubris.

[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah the David vs Goliath fight is a lot less one-sided when you remember David was a shepherd and a dab hand with a slingshot, he'd have been using it to defend his flock from predators from childhood and ancient armies fielded them as weapons of war. The man basically took a gun to a sword fight.

The lesson I think is less 'the weak can defeat the strong' in general and 'don't engage your enemy on his terms, engage him where you are strongest'.

[–] clanker_victim_555@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He must not be a Christian. If he doesn't know, how that story ends.

[–] derry@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Even if he is, do you think he's read the Bible?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Christian Nationalist ≠ Christian

Then again, Christian doesn't even mean Christ follower anymore.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure if he reads anything.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

And this Goliath is 6 foot 3, 235 pounds with 5% body fat. Honest 🤞

Its totally not a 5 foot 8, 300 pound tub of lard and spray tan wearing a diaper.