this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
1158 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87680 readers
2565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 47 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Please Moto, make a not gigantic 6in slab of a phone. Please make one ~5in with good specs.

[–] holy_scroller@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Sick of giant phones. Crazy hard to find a small phone with decent specs.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I want a new take on the Pixel 4a. Slim, light, reasonably rugged just by the nature that it's plastic all around and weighs nothing. I miss that phone still...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't care that much about size. Not nearly as much as the "flagship" designation bullshit. How about we don't have to pay 5x as much, because it's a flagship and still let us have Graphene?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ericwdhs@discuss.online 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Please ALSO make a giant 7" one, Moto. Thank you!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 111 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

I love graphene, but I hope they're planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene's long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users' standards.

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 147 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Yeah by "switch to" they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that's a later phase.

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 27 points 5 days ago

I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones

They do. They say it in their roadmap:

Hardware and firmware security are core parts of the project, but it's currently limited to research and submitting suggestions and bug reports upstream. In the long term, the project will need to move into the hardware space.

https://grapheneos.org/faq#roadmap

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Would you trust a pre-flashed phone though?

I guess with GOS they have integrity checkers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 72 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'm still looking for a solution after https://keepandroidopen.org/

About 50% of my apps are from F-Droid (the others are specific local apps and especially bank apps, which is difficult ...)

[–] tehsYs@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Will this affect graphene os?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 47 points 5 days ago (3 children)

if developers stop developing apps, that will affect GrapheneOS, yes

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 94 points 5 days ago (14 children)

They need to support it on the Moto G phones so people can actually afford them.

[–] pjusk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

iirc, as of right now, its only the expensive processors that meet the security standards GrapheneOS has. Therefore only being available in the future high-end Motorola phones.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yup its exactly this. And with supply shortages, itll take a while to filter down in price unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 days ago

Exactly. Graphene is not for the poors, still. Even used phones that can run it can be pricey.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What are the odds that it filters down?

I'll pick up a cheap android and put Lineage on it before I buy another flagship phone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago
[–] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What will US do if lenevo is Chinese and owns Motorola and now the US doesn't have backdoors like they do on Apple and Google devices.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago

I just got a pixel 9 refurbished for 350CAD and, a part from the irony of needing a phone made by google to have a degoogled phone, Graphene is a great OS. It just does what any basic phone os should do, and that's make it gold in the current dystopia.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)

personally i think Moto G Power is gonna be a beast with GOS

Dual sim slots sd card headphone jack insane battery

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

AFAIK they're only targeting their flagship models first. Guess we'll see, but I don't think the Moto G series will get it. At least not initially.

[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 51 points 5 days ago

I'll believe it when the roms hit xda.

Excited, sure, just hesitant. No buy until it's truth.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I 100% understand and support why the moved away from google.

And Motorola was a good choice. But they really should have supported some budget phones.

A pixel series a could easily be found for under 500€ new. These flagship motorola phones are all way over 1000€.

And the developer clearly said they had currently no intention to support cheaper motorola phones. Among other things because Motorola won't offer 7 year updates for anything but these flagships.

So, I get it. But let's face it that people on a budget will keep using pixels for GOS while they are maintained.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

The 2027 models will likely be flagship only however Graphene has tweeted that they plan to support cheaper Motorola phones in the future.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 47 points 5 days ago (2 children)

whistles

They make a $2,600 smartphone?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'd bet that about half the price is just the RAM soldered onto the thing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Okay good, they clarified that they won’t ship with it. I’ve seen people saying they will but I never read anything from Graphene or Moto stating that.

[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 30 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Wouldn't it be better if it DID? Wouldn't that get around all the "tamper" detection stuff?

Right now I have Google Play disabled in my owner profile, but it would be nice if apps in secondary profiles could pass the full Play Integrity checks... even though I'm actively trying to transition away from them.

For example Cisco DUO says my device with GrapheneOS installed has been tampered with, and I was hoping that would go away if I could just buy the phone with GrapheneOS installed.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (6 children)

In the long term, yes it would be better if it shipped.

However, if someone went to a phone store with a stock graphene on display and anything else next to it, which one do you think they'll choose?

Until Graphene's stock experience (i.e stock apps and launcher) mature enough to not look out of place next to google and apple, the average Joe will pick the more polished phone. I hope improving that is a task Motorola will be able to help with, while graphene keeps doing their thing.

Additionally with the app/play store dualopoly, Motorola would be shooting them selves in the foot if they didn't ship with the play store.

Getting an option beside a pixel for Grapheneos is pretty cool and a big step forward. I hope new demand will be high enough to show the decision makers that its an endeavor worth continuing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 30 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Man, I would be all over the is of it was on lower end models so I can run graphene as my sketchy international travel phone. But I don't really want to pay flagship prices for that. And I still believe in having a curated primary digital fingerprint.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lemmelemmy@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Sorry to be the party pooper but they’re also expected to be above 1200$

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I just want a flip phone that has 3rd party ROM support lol.

We're like half a decade into the flip scene and we've been stuck on OEM slop for too long.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This will apply to 2027 flagship Motorola devices, starting with a regular non-folding device, according to GrapheneOS developers who hinted at it being the successor to the Signature.

Thank goodness it won't just be one foldable. I was worried for a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›