this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
565 points (98.0% liked)

politics

30726 readers
2251 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan69@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago
[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 191 points 6 days ago (49 children)

My voting flow chart is socialists, then democrats, then nobody.

Imo, we can fight over what shade of blue after the pedos are out of office.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 81 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This right here. And it goes for centrist dems too. If a progressive is the candidate on the ticket, vote for them. Don't let the pedophiles win this one

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Seems notable that we don't have a headline with Joe Biden or whoever urging moderates to vote Democratic

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yes. The centrist ass dem I voted for veto'd a pro union bill. I would still vote for her over the alternative.

My primary votes are all left though.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There better not be one fucking democrat that doesn't vote in the midterms and the presidential election in '28.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The "I vote third party bc I wanna stick it to the democratic party" people will find a way to justify their delusions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 63 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And if you don’t vote in primaries, you need to start. It’s the only chance any of us have a say-so on who ends up on the Dem ticket.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This will not work by itself. The Dems have been cheating in the primaries for decades. Do it anyway! But also, we need to get into the bureaucracy.

We can't stop at voting in the primaries. The reason we have never gotten anywhere is because we are not in the machine. We watch from the outside.

If you personally can't do it, push someone you know to try. We have to be in the machine watching the boring procedural stuff, sitting and taking minutes, making and checking internal votes, leaking information when the status quo cheats, changing things from the roots.

The magats took over the Republican party. It took 30 years, and they had big money helping, but we can do it faster and cheaper if there's enough of us!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] protist@retrofed.com 63 points 6 days ago (18 children)

If Democrats don't take at least one chamber of Congress in the fall, I genuinely worry they may never again. The little that's left of American democracy won't survive another 2 years of full MAGA control. Anyone urging you to not vote for the Democrat in your races or to not vote at all is either running a right-wing/foreign influence campaign or so clueless about the big picture as to be safely ignored.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago (7 children)

It’s hard to buck the establishment. ~16,000 people were the difference in a state of 10 million.

If every eligible voter participated it wouldn’t even be close. Always blows my mind seeing comments on voting doesn’t matter when I’m on average voting for 3-4 other citizens in primaries.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 days ago

And then continue to work to make the party more reflective of its members

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (15 children)

Oh, we’ll vote for them, but the Democratic Party must cease to be undemocratic, and they must stop their ploy to act as a honeypot to capture and neutralize progressive policies and politicians. They must reckon with us, not the other way around. Armistice. That is the offer. After the midterms there will be deep canvassing in every district the shitlib Democrats thought were safe. Now they can go ask for more fucking money from their malefactors. They’ll need it.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And this is consistent with how Bernie has voted over the years. If his vote doesn't matter on a bill that will move things towards his goals but not enough, he votes no. However, if his vote is needed, he'll vote yes because some progress is better than no progress.

And it is always amazing how people will claim to like Bernie but really don't like it when this is pointed out.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (14 children)

Perfection is the enemy of the good. I understand that. I am also empathetic to the choice of those who sit out elections when they feel ignored. I don't agree with it, but i understand.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 22 points 5 days ago (20 children)

It totally depends on the candidate, their platform and who is financing their campaign. Just voting for someone because theyre a democrat gives us people like Kristen Sinema, Joe Manchin and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez who end up voting with the fascists.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Fetterman, Manchin, and Sinema, bad as they are and were, were still the better choice compared to their general election opponents.

An occasional collaborator sucks,. but is less-bad than either an unrepentant facist or an aligned "moderate" like Collins.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 36 points 5 days ago

I feel like people forget that the alternative to Fetterman was Dr Oz.

Swapping Fetterman for Oz would have given the GOP majorities in both House and Senate, put Mitch McConnell back as Senate President, and generally been an objectively worse outcome.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago

It totally depends on the candidate ...

That's what the primaries are for. Hope you have or will vote in yours this year.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (27 children)

Might as well pin this. Going to need this until November.

Just your friendly reminder that online right-wing operatives have a strong inclination to sow defeatism and apathy and push people to vote third party when it's abundantly clear that there won't be a race anywhere in the country where the Democrat isn't better than the Republican in a binary choice election. Clearly, Bernie agrees.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

As is tradition.

load more comments
view more: next ›