this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
622 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87002 readers
2572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 173 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Welp, let's get him elected and some of that immunity with it. Him running against flock and showing he is willing to do what it takes should give him good chances no?

[–] Blooper@lemmy.world 60 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Was going to say the same thing. I read his ballotopedia responses and he seems better than a Republican. But that's a pretty low bar.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

True. The Republican incumbent that he's running against, Tim Burchett, promised to legislate against Flock cameras. While that's nice, I no longer trust the promises of any Republican.

As far as I'm concerned, we need to replace all Republican politicians. If their opponent is a Democrat, we need to be a little careful not to elect a wolf in sheep's clothing. But if they're independents like the guy we're talking about, I think just about anybody would do. Like an animal or an inanimate object would even be infinitely preferable to a Republican.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 66 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Still eligible to hold office.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago

I'd vote for him.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 20 points 4 days ago

people have voted for far worse.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 112 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

From their Q&A:

Trickle down economics has failed to produce results. Subsidizing projects for corporations to reap the benefits while working class Americans struggle is fiscally irresponsible. Redirecting subsidies from multi-billion dollar corporations to public education and health programs.

Based.

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

This is a real politician who i want in office. Someone who talks the talk and walks the walk?

Finally. Gun violence I can support!

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 60 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This will get him more votes not fewer

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 16 points 5 days ago

Yeah, might have found a way to swing republican voters to his side.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 51 points 5 days ago

That would make me vote for him.

[–] EarlOfSam@quokk.au 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't be him. He was at my birthday party all of those days.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

True. I was there and also saw him each of those days.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He'd get my vote. ( If I were so unfortunate to have tolive in Tennessee)

[–] walden@wetshav.ing 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A beautiful state ruined by rednecks and religion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

He's just a kid, who took a wrong turn, and is from a good family. He's obviously going to turn his life around. In 10 years, my best guess is the guy's likely to become a surgeon.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Fuck dude. I'm moving there and voting for him

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

If I was in US he has my vote

[–] antiphon@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

I mean, based? Elect him

[–] Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip 39 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] devaly@ani.social 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Americans and their safety guns, safety cameras. You can't just call Bankruptcy Michael

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tourist@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago

nuh uh I was playing mecha chameleon with him when that happened

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 29 points 5 days ago

Can't be him, he was plowing my behind at that exact time.

[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He probably got a boost in the polls for this in Tennessee.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 26 points 5 days ago

Being sick of the expanding surveillence and censorship network that saw dystopian fiction as an instruction manual rather than a warning seems to reach across party lines.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Felony "charges". They can nullified just as easily as bad charges can be convictions if you have the correct jury.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Who cares? electing felons is in fashion this decade.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

Did you guys know that when you vote for state primaries you have to choose which political party to get the choices for and you don't see any other choices?

So this guy being independent, you would only ever get to vote for him if you picked the independent ballot and then you couldn't vote for any of the democrats who are the only real chances to actually win against republicans and unseat them.

You get, Democratic, Republican, Independent, Green Party or Issues Only. That's it.

Whole thing's fucking rigged man.

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you know that varies state by state?

My state has a jungle primary, you see all candidates irrespective of their or your party affiliation, and you vote for the ONE candidate you want to see on the ballot.

We also have ranked choice voting, which they are trying reallllly hard to take away.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I did not know this I really wish it was that way where I live.

Ranked choice is the answer

this is only true for the states without open primaries

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Well, yeah, that's kind of obvious. In primary elections you are deciding which candidate in a given party is going to be their candidate in the general election. It would make no sense for them to have independent candidates on their primary ballot. Since independent candidates, by definition, will not be a party's candidate.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 17 points 5 days ago

Can we make him president?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago

" we dint see anything" maybe he was shooting at the gun range.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you see someone damage fascist surveillance, no you didn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

He should get a medal instead.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I dont think id support his political ambitions ̶D̶o̶ due to his lack of education and work experience but we do share the same opinions on mass surveillance.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-adam-lee-heimermans-legal-defense

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Using what? Shotgun, paintball gun, pellet gun: I'll donate to this campaign/defense fund. Handgun, canon, or rifle: go fuck yourself.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Lol, what?

"I support it if he used a shotgun but by gawd if he used a handgun he can burn in hell"

This makes no god damn sense man.

Edit: I was wrong about this. The issue is that handguns and rifles will keep traveling and potentially kill someone. A shotgun with birdshot would not do that.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well, shotguns generally are extremely range limited, and birdshot is pretty mild after a couple dozen feet. You’re not gonna hurt someone accidentally, even if you completely miss the thing.

Handguns and rifles have an extremely high likelihood of hitting something or someone behind whatever you’re shooting at and travel great distance. Miss the camera, and you end up doming some poor bastard just walking down the street a mile away, or hitting some kid chilling in their room.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If by "extremely high likelihood" you mean "a remote but non zero chance" then I agree. It's obviously too high a chance to take when it could result in someone's death, but there's just to much empty space between people to make it likely he would hit someone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Basic gun safety states to know your target and what lies beyond it. Even a simple .45 has the potential to go through a camera, wall, and into a person, meaning that a perfect shot still has a non-zero chance of your bullet taking out a person or ruining someone's day.

Using one of the first gun types displays foresight and consideration that I'd desire in a politician. The second type indicates a reckless figure who is uninformed about the tools and power that they wield, and doesn't embody the values of a politician I'd trust.

It's not enough to take action and be a badass; it's important to also show that you'll at least try to keep your constituents safe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I broke my foot a few years ago and can't run anymore. I can't play anymore but I've really been considering pulling my paintball gun out of the closet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›