this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
507 points (95.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11928 readers
1205 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] djsiete@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The absolute worst thing about how STEM is taught in my country is how entirely devoid curriculums are from critical theory. You take inputs, outputs, energies and production as-is, and you get a crop of drones who think such discussions are irrelevant. Then they graduate, start working and earning good money -- and suddenly they support capitalist production structures because they're "rational" and "objective". Some then become the biggest chuds ever known to man.

I remember that I discussed gentrification with a civil engineer who happened to be my boss, a very renowned and talented person in our branch. He didn't know what gentrification was...

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't it funny how people who "have things" are less likely to be all that interested in leftism. And those who don't have "things" look at them, want more leftism because they want want the "things" the people who have "things" and they don't have.

And neither side understands the other.

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

Isn't it funny how people who "have food" are less likely to be all that interested in leftism. And those who don't have "food" look at them, want more leftism because they want want the "food" the people who have "food" and they don't have.

It's still garbled, but makes a better point.

[–] djsiete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 39 minutes ago

What do you want to say, exactly?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Republicans have never forgiven Alan Turing, and much prefer the contributions of IBM during the same period.

[–] fedikitty@piefed.social 29 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

If it's science, it's woke!
Real patriots use the abacus.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 87 points 20 hours ago

I feel like this isn't super new. You haven't been able to do things like talk academically about network security or cryptography without being incredibly critical of government for decades.

My professors sure were. I felt really bad for them, honestly. They were the driving force to make philosophy and ethics courses mandatory at my university in order to recieve a comp sci degree.

"If you work in these areas long enough, at a high enough level, you WILL be asked to compromise something for the benefit of a state actor, and you might not even realize it's happening. The person asking you to do it might not even realize what is really happening." Was what our prof told a packed lecture hall.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It's an introduction class, just start with history of computers and shift to programming from there.

You know, the history of computers, the Alan Turing, and the first assembly language, and the first software engineer, and "the entire pre-1992 internet."

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Even just the facts are incredibly "woke" leaning unless you just boil everything down to a single sentence factoid and dont go into much detail

[–] TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's basically everything, though.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Reminds me of creationist textbooks trying to teach about electricity.

Electricity is a mystery. No one has ever observed it or heard it or felt it. We can see and hear and feel only what electricity does. We know that it makes light bulbs shine and irons heat up and telephones ring. But we cannot say what electricity itself is like.We cannot even say where electricity comes from. Some scientists think that the sun may be the source of most electricity. Others think that the movement of the earth produces some of it. All anyone knows is that electricity seems to be everywhere and that there are many ways to bring it forth.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

What kind of an ego do you have to have to think you know everything about science, so you write a textbook, and when you get to electricity, you don't know anything about it, but since you know everything about everything, if you don't know anything about electricity, that means nobody else does, either?

[–] TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

That's the problem, they can believe in Jesus, but not electricity.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 63 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I'm sure these topics become relevant at some point, but I'm doubtful that it's absolutely necessary to address them in an intro course. how does leftist ideology help kids understand what a while loop does

like, literacy can do all of these things too, that doesn't mean you have to introduce those concepts at the same time as the abc's

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago) (1 children)
basket = []
for pos in billionaires: 
    if pos not in basket: 
-       basket += guillotine(b)
+      basket += guillotine(pos)  # Corrected iterable naming
[–] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
basket = [ guillotine(billionaire) for billionaire in population ]
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Almost. You just committed genocide.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

~~Nah he'll get a TypeError.~~ Not seeing why, honestly...

Unless you consider the merciless and systematic execution of all billionaires to be genocide...which I guess is technically fair...but it's for a good cause! (...said every genocidist ever...)

Of course, I changed the name of the iterable...

And we're talking about intro to compsci...getting a bit ahead of ourselves going right from loops to comprehension.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Hooooo boy, this person is going to make a terrible and incomprehensible intro class full of irrelevant infodumping lol.

[–] LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 17 points 21 hours ago

I've had the same approach from the other side of the aisle and let me tell you, talking about open source and liberal ideals in programming would be a lot less hostile than some fundie rant.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Chapter 41: how to open your IDE

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Chapter 42: why VIM is the best IDE

Chapter 43: So you're trapped in your IDE

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 4 points 19 hours ago

in my first semester of compsci we learned about chomsky hierarchy pretty much on day one, while we learned about while loops like a month later.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, that comment is just way over the top

[–] ChristerMLB@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago

I guess it is just a matter of time before the Trump regime designates logic as hardcore leftist ideology

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

I've seen a world where access to knowledge and power is paywalled. And I've seen the one where that freedom is a granted right. I know which one I picked, and it's because SO HELP ME, IF I CAN'T FIX IT MYSELF, I WILL BREAK IT MYSELF!

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago

I can't help but broadly agree, computing is the new de facto means of production. It is inherently political.

[–] LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 6 points 21 hours ago

(please please please be my prof next semester...)

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What? This is plain stupid

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

"...because when we go online, we free ourselves from consumerism, racism, and get to express ourselves however we want without it getting back to our school or employer."

Honest Trailers may have gone downhill from thier peak, but Hackers (and the OG Dune) videos gave great lines worth sharing

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What's so political about hello world, data structures and algorithms?

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 20 hours ago

Data structures: authority

Algorithms: the system

Hello world: community

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, programming lessons taught in 2016 are still pretty much going to teach programming now, so it shouldn't be too hard if you put your mind to it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The programming hasn't changed; the Overton window has.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah those for...next loops are pure communism.