this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
82 points (96.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

43095 readers
265 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nature creates round objects all the time (stones in a river, a hedgehog in a ball,...), but the principle of an axle is not found as far as I know.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notabot@piefed.social 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's an interesting point. Rollers were likely in use long before whels-on-axles, and you could argue that those are basically wheels and partly axles, as they rotated freely from the load, and they do the job of both, but neither as well as an actual wheel on a dedicated axle. It was only when the wheel and axle were separated that we got the full benefit.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

But good sir, what use is an axle and wheel without whatever doohicky thingamajig that attaches to a frame that transports things or people?

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 9 points 3 days ago

Not sure if you're serious or not, but wheels and axles are used for a lot more than just transportation. Pottery wheels predate vehicles by about 1,000 years. Windmills and water wheels use interlocking wheels and axles to grind grain. A windlass is essentially just a rope tied to a wheel on an axel for hoisting stuff up, like a bucket in a well.

Not that this matters to the discussion of naturally occurring wheel-and-axle structures. Just an interesting little aside on the value and versatility of wheels.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

yep, i don't think there's basically any living organism that is made of two parts that are not solidly attached to another, sothat they can rotate against one another.

knee joint might come to mind, but that's also connected by collagene i think, so it can't rotate by more than 360°.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has a whole article on this subject:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotating_locomotion_in_living_systems

The exceptions it mentions are bacterial flagella and part of the digestive system of some bivalves.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

yeah thanks for the article! rotating bacterial flagella is what came to my mind as well, but it's microscopically small (i think the flagella is a single macro-molecule?) so i'm not sure whether to include it in the list of (macroscopic) "mechanical rotation"... it's more like biochemical mechanical rotation.

if we go for biochemical mechanical rotation, there's more: ATP-Synthase is a molecule that sits in cell membranes and that rotates as well each time that a proton passes through it.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think the bivalve style is the more interesting case—it’s like their guts have a built-in mortar-and-pestle.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If your knee can turn 360°, you should talk to some scientists, so that they can study you.

Rotating is in nature, but as you said: always with a maximum rotation, never free without limits.

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How about this insect with a pair toothed gears? Not an axle, but still amazing!

"The juvenile Issus - a plant-hopping insect found in gardens across Europe - has hind-leg joints with curved cog-like strips of opposing ‘teeth’ that intermesh, rotating like mechanical gears to synchronise the animal’s legs when it launches into a jump."

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's gears, alright, but i don't think that it can rotate by more than 360°?

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, that's what I meant by not an axle.

But, come to think of it, we can swing our arms round and round, more than 360°.

[–] technohacker@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would argue that's more due to the up-down and front-back limited rotations combining to form a circular mode, kinda like a Cartesian to Polar coordinate mapping

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

that's reasonable.

bonus fun fact - the etymology is connected - "axle" comes from older words for "shoulder", or "armpit", which survives in some regional Englishes as "oxter" - the connection is apparently that you'd carry a person by putting their arms up and linking at the shoulders, much like an axle is how wheels carry a cart.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/axle

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

But hedgehogs aren't wheels. There, I said it.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I know at least one that is.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

also a lot of animals like going downhill in unconventional ways, such as this one:

(should be a GIF file)

alternative image link:

https://media.tenor.com/aSBOSQUUzhIAAAAM/gliding-penguins-continent7.gif

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Not with that attitude

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago

Philip Pullman goes into this a bit in the 3rd book of His Dark Materials.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is the invention of the differential that is the big deal.

You are correct, nature has round things all over the place. It is like the silly joke who is the first dude to eat a crab? They guy who watch a bird do it.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The differential is a relatively new invention if we consider how long wheels have been around. You didn't need a differential for a 1 wheeled hand cart like a wheel barrow nor for a wheeled drawn behind cart like a horse carriage.

[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

right, even trains don't need diffs, the conic-slice wheels take care of turns fine without.