this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
26 points (100.0% liked)

Space

2563 readers
31 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceโ€™s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Earthling105b@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hopefully they can get it stabilized to try and complete the mission. The space telescope they are going for will re-enter the atmosphere either way so itโ€™s worth a shot. This is a cool mission, especially since this will probably be the last air-launched orbital space mission we will see for a long time, maybe ever.

[โ€“] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Idk, sporadic comms, down to 1/3 reaction wheels, and prop problems... Using their electric thrusters to null rotation sounds like not a good time. I'm not optimistic.

It's called a space beyblade

[โ€“] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like it's more surprising that this random startup with no track record got the contract in the first place. Like, of course their first satellite has some issues. This would have been an ambitious mission even for a proven company.

[โ€“] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Welcome to the Age of Grift.