This is becoming a real concern. An ambulance company in my area has been found to have cameras facing the patients recording audio and video.
This shit is getting out of hand.
Edit: Replaced with a better link.
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
269 points (98.6% liked)
Privacy
10356 readers
190 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Ambulances in germany have a camera recording everything that is happening inside.
It protects the patients if the first responders fuck up or are psychos. And it protects the workers from false claim court cases.
Whats bad about that?
Hmm thinking about it, I guess in germany the ambulance is not run by companies.
Whats bad about that?
One issue is particularly in regards to the audio. While an argument can be made that having video record protects the patients from malpractice and protects the EMTs from abusive patients, the audio would contain a LOT of HIPAA-protected details such as the patient's name, date of birth, insurance details, known diagnoses, prescribed medications, etc. While the video obviously captures a person's face and body, possibly in injured or nude states, a lot of that technically isn't HIPAA-protected material so there's conceivably a loophole for video. But audio contributes basically nothing to anybody's safety, and only serves to potentially leak a patient's PII.
Why can’t you just add HIPAA controls around the video and audio content?
HIPAA isn't an issue here, the audio and video would just be treated as PHI protected health information, like the video of a colonoscopy.
That’s my point.
There isn’t an issue recording these things, they just need the proper controls
Funny, I was just arguing with someone who swears up and down that no car company is actually doing this.
It's the law that every US car company will be doing this soon!
Hey look, it is one of those things that would be great if it worked perfectly and never sent data out from the vehicle but since it won't be perfect and it will absolutely be designed to send telemetry it will be a dystopian nightmare as the article points out.
I'm mostly in the same boat. It would be neat, but auto manufacturers have already started grumbling about the money it will cost to build one of these devices, and there's no way they would fail to either
- pass this cost on to the consumer, or
- collect the data to sell later, or
- simply do both. Probably this one.
Money isn't my objection. I think mandating safety equipment like back up cameras is a good thing.
This is fantasy tech that will never work reliably for the entire population and therefore it should not be required even if it was free.
Again, "safety" is how we get mass surveillance (protect the children ! Well except for the Epstein class thats fine). The backup camera led to screens. Which lead to more cameras. Tech is not good and needs to get out of cars.
I'm sorry, my backup camera is called the fucking mirrors or getting off your ass to look behind you if youre that unsure. Just last year I got backed into my car by a truck WITH CAMERAS and he "didnt see me" and thought he ran over a rock.
If youre so stupid you need a backup camera, you dont deserve a vehicle. Same with blind spot monitors. Use your eyes and this thing we have called a neck to turn your head.
0 of my cars have had cameras. I drive 20k miles a year ish, never been in an accident (which yes, is partially just luck, but I am a cautious driver with autosport experience).
And yes "if everyone was like me the world would be better".
Back up cameras are awesome because you can see all the way to the ground. They are a massive safety benefit just like airbags, seat belts, and crumple zones.
Backup cameras existing are not the reason that their screens were misused for other negative purposes and you can't blame them any more than you can blame better brakes for increasing vehicle weights because they are better at stopping.
Theyre fine, but then that shit is mandated and now suddenly every car is required to have a screen and no physical buttons with outdated shit software. Thats the issue. Tech will always lead to enshittification. I'd rather have none of it, and I'm pissed off that I have no choice, other than used cars, of which the US government crushed hundreds of thousands to further make us poorer and force us into new surveillance mobiles they can control on a whim.
What the fuck happened to being able to spec my car exactly as I want ? Thats why the mustang was such a success. You want a radio? Cool check the box. You dont want it? OK no problem dont check the box.
Want a camera? Get a kit you can install or have a shop install. It doesn't need to be mandated.
That doesn't exist now. You automatically get all these bullshit doodads no one wants or cares about that also make the car far more expensive and unreliable and unrepairable.
I don't want a modem. I don't want a screen. I don't want electric seats. I don't want cameras. Sure, I'll take airbags and seatbelts, but none of that requires the other junk.
No car is required to have no physical buttons. They do that because it's cheaper for the screen to be a touchscreen than to spend pennies on buttons. The regulation only specifies that there has to be a camera. The screen can still be controlled by buttons or rotary dials. Mercedes was still doing that up till the early 2020s for some models. My 2019 C-Class had no touch screen, despite having a nice wide and clear screen. Exactly how I preferred it.
If theres gonna be regulation, I want it regulated that every car have physical buttons, and blinding high beams are illegal, modem connectivity is illegal, and subscription seats are illegal along with locked down ecus that can only be unlocked at dealers (see: Volkswagen electronic e brakes) being illegal. This is how legislation should work for us but it doesn't. We get garbage that makes all our lives worse.
every car is required to have a screen and no physical buttons with outdated shit software
That isn't a requirement, just companies chasing shitty trends. Several brands never dropped the physical air conditioning and volume controls from the dashboard or reversed it within a year or two based on feedback.
You are ranting about industry trends and conflating them with safety requirements. Those things are intertwined in some ways but the majority of your rant has nothing to do with actual requirements, just shitty cost cutting choices.
Sure, but they are intertwined, which is what I'm getting at.
The gov and carmakers are far too mixed together for me. We should be able to get anything we want, and we can't.
My car has physical buttons for all the important stuff, standard dash interface for the panel, and runs open source software on the relatively small central infotainment screen.. And the telemetry and transmission stuff can be easily disabled by pulling a fuse or removing a module behind the screen, depending on your goals. It’s a 2023 bolt base package, no bells and whistles unless you count lane assist, which can be disabled, and the backup camera. If chevy stops supporting it, it’ll become a community project.
There are choices. Not many, but they are there.
Yeah very few. And they killed the volt so I wouldn't be surprised if the bolt is next.
Drooling not grumbling, drooling. Major car manufacturer in europe actually advertised it. The other even put cops in the back seat.
And its very silent on major news Media. Wonder why. Should be mass outrage and riots.
Does this also mean they can't discuss patient information around Alexa or Google Nest, or pretty much any smartphone? It's really hard to not get your voice recorded and sent to the corponet these days.
Private conversations - doctors, security - can't be held within earshot of Alexa or its ilk simply because the wake word triggers the sending of audio to America, which violates privacy and sovereignty regs in orgs that pay attention to the rules they all must adhere to and don't want to be investigated.
This often means phones to be used near those conversations require some disabling of agent trash.
In the case of Alexa or Google Nest, it's not actually constantly recording or sending stuff to the cloud. Those things have a special wake-word chip, that is trained on one or a few phrases (okay google). That's fully offline, and only once it detects the wake word does it activate the actual microphone and processing.
If you believe Google and Amazon, that is. Which I surely don't. But if they were actually constantly recording and sending that data somewhere, security researchers would have noticed odd traffic in their network.
Tl;dr: However they’re supposed to work you can’t trust them.
There’s no “chip.” Alexa, Google assistant, and Siri are always listening. They are looking for the command word, and in the case of Alexa and Google assistant they take at least a thirty second buffer from before the command word for “context.” It was verified several years ago (not sure if it has changed since) that Siri is the most conservative, stripping anything before the command word. All of this is handled in a subroutine that is running as part of the OS for these devices.
There have been documented cases where Alexa and Google devices were recording and uploading 24/7, these were dismissed as “bugs” but they were also only discovered because the users were checking network usage at home. I have not heard of that happening with Siri but that doesn’t mean it hasn’t.
Documented where? I've never been able to find any sources for that claim.
This was the one for the Google Home Mini... the fabric on the top was causing some of the devices to constantly record (there is a sensor up there that you could tap to ask a question instead of using the wake word). Once it was discovered Google disabled the tap feature.
I remember hearing about issues with Alexa also constantly recording some years ago, but I don't recall the specifics of that case enough to be able to easily search for it.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence
Oops, I cut the power cable to the camera when I picked up the loaner, my bad~
That would be $999.999
Microphones..