this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
269 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

10371 readers
133 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman said an Audi loaner car's Lytx camera recorded her conversations, sparking privacy concerns over dealership fleet monitoring.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Whats bad about that?

One issue is particularly in regards to the audio. While an argument can be made that having video record protects the patients from malpractice and protects the EMTs from abusive patients, the audio would contain a LOT of HIPAA-protected details such as the patient's name, date of birth, insurance details, known diagnoses, prescribed medications, etc. While the video obviously captures a person's face and body, possibly in injured or nude states, a lot of that technically isn't HIPAA-protected material so there's conceivably a loophole for video. But audio contributes basically nothing to anybody's safety, and only serves to potentially leak a patient's PII.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why can’t you just add HIPAA controls around the video and audio content?

[–] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

HIPAA isn't an issue here, the audio and video would just be treated as PHI protected health information, like the video of a colonoscopy.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

That’s my point.

There isn’t an issue recording these things, they just need the proper controls