this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
45 points (94.1% liked)

Feminism

1567 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!

Rules:

  1. This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
  2. Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
  3. Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
  4. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
  5. Follow site-wide rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/63404866

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) has published official guidelines that address how to showcase women athletes without overly sexualizing the camera angles.

The EBU describes itself as the world’s leading alliance of public service media, with 113 member organizations in 56 countries, with an additional 31 associates in Asia, Africa, Australasia and the Americas.

The guide, titled Raising the Bar, focuses on women’s track and field and includes multiple examples of how to both position cameras while at the same time avoiding certain compromising angles.

During the 2024 Olympics, the CEO of Olympic Broadcasting Services specifically called on camera operators to film both male and female athletes the same way to avoid “stereotypes and sexism” creeping into television coverage of the sporting event. This guide, which gives specific examples, feels like a natural extension of that broad call.

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wren@lemmy.today 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

From the pictures alone it almost reads like a parody, except that is reality. Good on them for calling it out.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

It seems really obvious, doesn't it?

I'm glad that there seems to be a shift in how women athletes should be treated. This is a great guide for photographers.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And then viewership drops by 90% because sweaty creeps dont actually wanna see the sports....

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And nothing of value would be lost lol

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no im just saying how fucked up it is. There are olympic athletes from the usa who pay for their sports with money from onlyfans. The us only supports athletes who have acheived something which means if its your first time on the olympics, you have to finance it yourself.