this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
943 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck The USA

731 readers
360 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

Here's a harsh reality people need to understand.

Israel is NOT the US's rabid dog.

Israel owns US politicians.

Israel is taking over US media

Israel is working to forcibly integrate the US's military into its own

Israel has dragged the US into multiple illegal wars of aggression against it's regional opponents

Israel is training ICE, the US gestapo

Israel is selling spyware to the US to spy on Americans.

 

Israel isn't the US's rabid dog.

Israel is COLONIZING the USA

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Bro, when Eritrea and fucking Afghanistan declare food a human right, but not fucking America?????

Yeah, America is fucked.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a country that was planted somewhere it didn’t belong, murdered the people already living there, and claimed the land as its own… and then there’s its ally, Israel

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 3 points 15 hours ago

~~ally~~ twin sibling *

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

That's what I would have expected.
US: "human rights are a commodity, and you get them if you have the money."
Israel: "The natives aren't humans. And we humans have food, so no declaration needed."
One is the Ferengi nation. The other is a classic Apartheid state.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This is why no country should have veto power. The USA and Israel have held back the UN from fulfilling its promise for...ever, really. China, Russia, and other have pitched in to fuck up good things from time to time but it's usually the big two war god worshipping nations.

When a religion is based on worshipping a god of war, don't be surprised when they're violent; physically, mentally, verbally, politically...

Edit: as pointed out in a reply: Israel has no veto power.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Edit: as pointed out in a reply: Israel has no veto power.

Not officially at least.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

From my research.

This wasn't a UN vote. It was a committee vote on whether to bring it to the assembly or not. Obviously if the US is against it then there's no reason to have a vote.

Also it wasn't really making food a right for your citizens, it was about using starvation as a war tactic.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Israel has no veto power, thank god

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Thank you for the correction. Shame on me for being too lazy to look it up.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 127 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Its always those two for any attempt to improve human rights rules

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh come on now. Russia and China are usually in there as well

[–] ConstructiveVandalism@piefed.zip 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Suspicious username, but you are actually right.

„Why is it always you four…?“

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I shouldn't say this aloud so as to not give them any ideas but why is it that the people woth names like 'yourfriendlyMI5handler' and 'CIAgentinyourwalls' are usually the least glowy accounts but you find someone like 'casualdejekyll' is visible from space?

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

What you saying I’m not glowy??? What’s your location? Never mind I already know your location! And what you ate for breakfast, and that your password is your great aunt Sheryl’s birthday + the letters “globludoo!@@“

Also, dude, that porn is pretty vanilla, you gotta up your game, branch out a bit,

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

!quote

!remindme 2 days 26 hours 72 minutes

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

I mean it's pretty clear at this point that the tail is wagging the dog when it comes to the US and Israel and Israel doesn't want any impediments to their final solution.

[–] Zamotic@lemmy.zip 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Shocker! The country that can't even agree to give children free lunches in schools voted that food isn't a human right? I'm more and more shameful of my country by the second.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If we just give the children food, what incentive will they have to work in the mines?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

On the other hand, children need to be well-nourished if we're going to harvest their organs and stem cells. Hmmmm ...

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

AKA Israel and Israel-lite

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The plot twist here is that Israel is actually US-lite. Israel is commiting its genocide in an effort to steal native land, the US completed its genocidal land acquisition long ago.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I argue the opposite in another comment.

The USA is being colonized by Israel. Israel effectively owns the US gov and most US media, while also attempting to takeover the US military.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For the US to be colonized by Israel, the Israelis would need to be moving here and displacing the population.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If we're talking "settler colonialism" like they're doing in Palestine or Russia is doing in Crimea, then yes.

Instead, Israel is simply sending money, "diplomats" and spies to take over the USA. This is exploitation colonialism.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Violence usually does, for the people commiting the violence. 😥

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

The owning corporation should come first.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's always those two. But hey, don't you ever dare saying so because you'll always find someone who goes either "But not all americans!!!!" Or "OMG! Antisemitism!!!!!".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago
[–] NeuralRot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's not really harsh. I knew thus shit since the day I was 5 and watched Israel kill children on TV in 2002/2003

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, sadly, none of this is new.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago

And look how you turned out

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I had no idea there were only 4 countries left in the UN. When did that happen?

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 17 hours ago

I think we can safely replace all UN members without veto power with muppets and it would not change the results of any vote or decision made by UN. UN would have only 5 members then (only the ones who can veto a decision) and it would require unanimous voting.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Look, you can't make profitable things a "right", that just leads to lower profits becsuse pesky regulations around what people "have a right to".

/s

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

should have declared it anyway

Glad to not see the usual excuses here when this is mentioned saying nonsense about "trying to force us to pay".

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are probably some countries that vote for the proposition to look good, knowing the USA will veto.

[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no veto in the General Assembly.

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

So you could think that the vote does not really matter, nor does it have binding force?

load more comments
view more: next ›