planned $499 per month subscription
lol
taking bets on how long it will take for this to become abandonware
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
35 points (73.3% liked)
Technology
7054 readers
779 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Quick...
I saw a story a while ago about a tech company renting out airbnbs as training environments for these types of bots
They absolutely destroyed the houses, fine motor skills is insanely difficult, and the robots just kept breaking everything.
The coders don't understand how the human brain works (no one does really, but they're especially ignorant). So they're trying to to make one "thing" that controls everything instead of a bunch of subprocesses acting along guidance
I bet it never even makes it to market. Now robots will for sure, but these first ones out of the gate types rarely make it.
I'd love to have a robot to handle basic home maintenance tasks. Somehow, I'm not quite willing to bet $20k and $500/month on this thing being anything more than a gimmick. I'd also be really curious what happens to my $20k robot if I cancel the subscription and/or the company goes under. Do I just end up with a really expensive object lesson is poor spending decisions?
I mean they demoed this thing not that long ago and it was a disaster. So yeah, my expectations are low.
Pretty much. There's basically zero chance this will not end up on the pile of products released way before they reached commercial viability.
load more comments
(1 replies)
wait. wait. wait. theres a monthly fee as well?
What, you expect to actually own something that costs you $20k? Quit obstructing their access to your bank account. Think of the shareholders!
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
They're replacing underpaid immigrant workers with underpaid overseas workers remotely controlling a crummy robot, while some rich techbro asshole in the middle skims off almost all the money. I do hope they fail with this stupid idea, but your techbro will already have made off with the money for their next startup scam.
I do chores for less than that.
And I'm fuckable.
Are you though?
I am fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques.
How much do you charge for fucking vs. chores?
...and then doing the fucking chores?
I'm asking for a sick friend.
Why do they keep insisting on humanoid? Just give me the crushinator to do chores for $10,000.
load more comments
(15 replies)
It's amazing, they can make a 20k humanoid but it's impossible to make a 20k EV car.
Here's the neat part: they can't.
Fuck $20K for anything. We need an under $10K car.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I suppose for a large house, $500/mo. is what one would pay for maid service.
I don't believe one robot can effectively clean piss from the corner behind the toilet, AND do laundry, AND clean windows, AND dust, AND clean a shower head, AND clean a refrigerator, etc., etc.
Imagine a robot collecting everything out of a fridge onto a counter, removing the glass shelves, cleaning them, cleaning the inside of the fridge, and then putting everything back without breaking anything, and doing it in 30 minutes. Not happening. Even if it were done completely by remote control, I don't think it could do it.
These things are not anywhere close to a replacement for a human, but they'll keep pushing it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
But can you fuck it?
Asking for a friend.
I'm the friend.
Bullshit
Nah, not bullshit. Just doesn't do them without remote human control. That falls under "features to he introduced at a later date."
Who's homes?
Sherlock Homes.
*whose
Knock knock theres? who's
Whose who's?
They have been saying this since the 1990s, Rocky had a robot maid. Useless unless you just want something that kills anything that moves, which would be pretty cool I guess.
“Our company is cooler than X because we put a ‘1’ in front of it.”
view more: next ›