645
Massively selfish prick.
Hope there is a school or group she can file a lawsuit against.
She's facing many hours of counseling. Not sure how well Argentina's mental health coverage provides.
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
645 points (98.4% liked)
Not The Onion
21925 readers
2364 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Despite the shocking turn of events, Rosario managed to... safely bring the Cessna back to the airfield without damaging the aircraft.
What a bizarre thing to say. Well, phew, I guess. Lucky the aircraft wasn't damaged by the single female pilot who already had her licence and was just building up hours. Me and all other males in the world would have expected her woman-brain to take over and cause her to panic-land while doing a backflip and simultaneously rolling her ankle or some shit apparently.
I'm seriously struggling to understand why "without damaging the aircraft" was added to the sentence.
Because when you're a student it's easy to fuck up and break things. Clipping trees cuz he came in at the wrong angle, landing too hard and fucking up the landing gear, colliding with a telephone wire, you get the idea. Now imagine all of that studentness and also your instructor just committed suicide. Now that's in your brain too. So yeah it's irrelevant fact.
Making the point about the damage is more relevant tan you making it a gender thing. But agree it was a strange note for a deadly situation.
Simple, people assume "student pilot" means doom without realizing how far along people fly with instructors.
I think it's much to assume the surprise is about gender instead of the word "student".
Yes this headline is clearly intended to reinforce the patriarchy rather than to get clicks and sound more suspenseful. And everyone was thinking about the pilot's gender before you brought it up.
what a piece of shit. you want to kill yourself, go to hell on your own.
Didn't he though? He left the plane in the hands of a capable pilot. No one else was injured. No property was lost.
student pilot successfully landed a plane by herself
Illustration picture is a man.
This is infuriating.
That's a picture of the instructor not the student
I thought it was some rando pilot they found.
"We need a picture of a pilot for this tragic story. Not smiling, stupid."
Who cares about the instructor?
Whaaaat that's nuts
Are you not entertained??
Man, I thought i disappointed some teachers.
story about suicide
Entertainment section
This sort of this should get websites permabanned from Lemmy as a source.
Fuck you, dexerto
load more comments
(1 replies)
Incredibly cruel. What a monster.
Mens mental health is already a disaster, but in the airline industry it's made worse by the fact that you can lose your piloting license just by seeking help. This is a tragic story. I've joked about this story elsewhere, but I've learned more about it since then.
Very similar in law enforcement as well.
I personally worked alongside three people who committed suicide for years in our tiny district of maybe 50 patrol deputies over the span of about three years. Kirk Keithley was my zone partner for a long time, then it was Terry Strawn, and then finally Daniel Leyden.
Of course, they also murdered their S/Os and other family members as well, so I'm not exactly pouring one out for them, but it's an undeniable trend more broadly - that spaces that theoretically require the utmost in mental health often paradoxically result in mental health crises because of the stigma and practicality of undermining your paycheck; when the problem is still solvable, it's "not big enough of a deal to risk my job over it."
It's a messy picture with cops, too because that job so strongly attracts cluster B personality types. You're not just working a job that is institutionally trying to drive you crazy (Killology seminars and all), but the job itself is highly attractive to the most unstable people in society.
True. It's a mess.
Pedantically that doesn't take away from your point but asserting just for clarity because I see people bring it up a lot:
The infamous Killology lecture isn't taught to the vast majority of law enforcement in the US as I understand it. We certainly didn't receive it (or similar) at my academy.
I've heard it isn't quite as bad as cherry-picked-and-taken-out-of-context-to-malign, but I've personally never watched it, much like I haven't read Mein Kampf; "That seems like a soup sandwich of nasty, so I'm not going to waste my time."
It should be the other way around. LEO should be required to get regulator mental health help. It's a stressful job, potentially dangerous, they're armed and have people's lives in their hands. We need to make damn sure they are capable of handling that with a sound mind.
As previously mentioned, they simply bottle it up. It's not hard to "I've never had any suicidal ideations" your way out of any mandatory screening as currently implemented. Some are better at rooting out deception like that, but apparently that's not in the budget. I received an MMPI-style questionnaire and subsequent interview, but so did all three of those peers I mentioned who passed just the same as I did. Hell, one of my academy classmates told the psychologist he thought he was Batman. When pressed for why, he relented and said it was an outburst because he was distraught due to his goldfish dying. He obviously made it through with a Pass and I think is still on the force many years later? His social media is intentionally obscure so it's hard to say.
Truth be told, reforming law enforcement in this and other ways is simply not politically motivating for most Americans; they're generally either focused on other single issues, "The police are perfect and criticizing them is immoral," or "The police are all bastards and need to be abolished."
I'm not dumb enough to tell everyone I meet I was a cop so all of my discussions about the matter are generally relegated to the internet, but of the people I bump elbows with on the topic on Reddit, 90% of the time it turns into name-calling and other bad faith tactics. The other evidence I use is... -gestures broadly at the state of US politics-. Remember when people were marching in the streets to fix the police? Remember how it generally didn't?
view more: next ›