this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
208 points (95.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69711 readers
443 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 89 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

Probably gonna get hate for this but like... Yeah if I had the option to pay for more things and not be tracked and dataharvested, I would. The infrastructure and support isn't free. What's really shit is when they do both... The prices should be lower, like way way way lower, but middlemen all want their cuts for transactions so you'll almost never see subs for under a dollar.

[–] brawndo@piefed.social 86 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just because you pay a subscription to avoid ads does not mean your data is not still being harvested and sold. The big exception is now they have a payment method tied to a specific person not just an ad profile.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

That has more to do with what apps you chose to use and give them your data.

But people still don't get the basic principle "if you don't pay, you are not the customer, your are the merchandise being sold".

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are right but just as the original commenter said, even if you pay there is no way to be sure the app you just paid for isn't harvesting and selling your sweet sweet usage data. Like Tiktok I'd imagine would 100% do.

I am at a point where I'd really like to support and pay for apps, even closed source ones, just so they don't show me ads or harvest my data. Open source is much better at that, of course.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

No way to be sure? It is absolutely sure that they are harvesting every bit of data they can from you.

My wife was shocked when she googled herself and found information that could only have been obtained by reading all of her emails. I explained that Gmail and other mail services are not charities, and if you're not paying for them with money, you are paying with something else.

Yep. Like proton started out immediately as a secure alternative. I'd trust them. I imagine tuta and others as well.

As for the rest (Google, meta, tiktok) I'd say there is zero chance your data would ever hope to never be harvested.

[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 days ago

I mean I get where you're coming from, but imo we shouldn't have to pay to not be tracked and data harvested. You can run ads and have them not be creepy stalky, it's only greed to maxmize profits that pushes companies to go for the stalker option.

[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

I know this is in the UK, but on this topic, in the EU, is it even legal to require to pay to avoid tracking? Tracking should require consent, but it should be non-forced, meaning, connecting the consent to some other condition, like paying, is likely not legal.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have YouTube premium but (besides now) I'm borderline afraid to reveal this to anyone online due to crowd mentality being fully against paying for YouTube. It's around 3.5€ per month for me as part of family plan me and bunch of friends created. Supposedly creators earn far more from premium watches than people watching ads, so that's nice to know.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I like(d) YouTube premium. It pays significantly more to creators while removing ads and adds other paywalled features like music.

But I stopped mine because I became more budget conscious, and because I basically stopped using the site entirely because the UX is so bad! I primarily use freetube desktop and pipepipe android, so creators weren't going to get paid for my views anyways, so I just cancelled... But ideally, if the site UX wasn't terrible and I used it as intended, I'd happily sub.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't use tiktok for reasons that would be preaching to the choir here, but pardon me for asking... Isn't everything on TikTok an ad? Like they're either telling people to buy a book, put sugary syrup in water, buy organising plastic containers, selling slime, selling ice cube trays that ironically make them no longer cubes, selling makeup, clothing hauls, generating affiliate revenue, asking people to enlist... I could go on. It's just ads all the way down? What would someone see if they removed all the #ad posts?

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My tiktok fyp is mostly cooking videos, animals, skits and music stuff. If they're trying to advertise something they're doing a terrible job.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Or an extremely good one.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

But one is your favorite creator and one isnt.

But yes, both are essentially ads.

You now have a choice between being addicted for free or being addicted for 3.99 per month! Nice.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Smug and proud that TikTok has never earned a dime from me

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

Neither from me. At least not voluntarily or knowingly.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How about no tiktok at all. It's all slop.

[–] LightYagami@lemmus.org 1 points 14 hours ago

Everything is slop these days, I'm actively out here touching grass and have never felt better

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah that happens a lot with the model most apps and platforms use. The venture capital today, figure out how to actually become profitable tomorrow. That transition is usually messy.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

Yep. Not even once. Bring the web back to its roots. Fuck all these grifters.

[–] OldSageRick@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I can't decide if I hate TikTok or VC more

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 14 points 4 days ago

TikTok only ruins itself. VC ruins infinitely more stuff.

[–] RevolverSly@fedinsfw.app 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But, tictocs are already ads. So, what's now, ads with extra ads?

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Join the premium brain rot plan today! Addictively doom scroll through ai slop ad free for less than 5 quid a month!

[–] GhostFace@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile tiktok creators earn a lot less than influencers on other platforms...

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

That's why you repost (☞゚ヮ゚)☞

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

TBH, I think 50% of my wife's TT usage is finding cheap neat things on TT ads.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow, you now have the option to pay to have no ads? Something that's been pretty standard for like the last 10 years

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

The alternative is to just not have that option, which makes no difference if you just don't choose it

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Jfc who the fuck uses this app.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Or just patch it with Morphe.

[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They (Google) will eventually ban morphle developers. All is heading that way with android

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If they touch Adb it's over for Android altogether. So they can't actually do anything.

[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

What good is adb if they system is blacklisting install by this developer?
Imo it is over for android, yes that's the point.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Adb installs bypass all that, and without adb nobody could make and test android apps so they would have no apps to sell.

That said I think looking into Linux phones is a good idea because Google are a scumbag company.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

To be fair, one thing often overlooked is these things don't run in rainbows and unicorn dust. Especially a video platform. $$. To expect it completely free is kind of crazy.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago

Have to pay for the slop generating propaganda machine somehow.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago

Reminder that it took nearly 10 years for YouTube to start making profit. At some point the platform was burning around billion dollars per year.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

I'd be willing to devote taxes to social media without ads and featuring a non-malevolent algorithm. If it allowed people to communicate with each other like Twitter or Facebook, it would be a service to the benefit of the public.

Once upon a time, at least here in the states, we believed in a government that served the public good.

load more comments
view more: next ›