this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
246 points (95.6% liked)

News

36618 readers
2099 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican vice-presidential nominee continues to face questions about comment as campaign speeds up

The Republican vice-presidential nominee, JD Vance, claimed that calling leading Democrats “a bunch of childless cat ladies” was merely a “sarcastic remark”, as he attempted to deflect charges of misogyny and redirect fire at Harris’s own running mate, Tim Walz, on Tuesday.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This couch fucker really is a dumbass isn’t he?

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

With conservatives you really only have two choices: they're idiots or psychopaths (and that isn't an exclusive "or")

[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If the “or” is inclusive you shouldn’t use “either”

skeletor-running.jpg

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Shit, true! I'll just edit that away and we can pretend it never happened. WHO CONTROLS THE PAST CONTROLS THE FUTURE

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Here, have some nerds arguing extensively over whether that's necessarily the case.

[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nerds argue all the time about the darnedest things, like the Oxford comma. Which is abhorrent.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Merle Haggard's two ex-wives, Kris Kristofferson and Robert Duvall

Highlights of his global tour include encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod and a dildo collector.

[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Nah, nerd and proud.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

He didn't get where he is today by being smart or talented. He got where he is today by bending over and letting Peter Thiel use him as a sock puppet.

[–] expr@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just gonna keep posting this since we shouldn't be perpetuating lies: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/jd-vance-couch-cushions/.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We all know it isn't true. That's what makes it even funnier because Vance is exactly the kind of person who looks like he would do it and he's doing a very poor job at making anyone think otherwise.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No all we really know is he didn’t write about it in his book. We really have no idea whether or not he ACTUALLY did or not. I know I’ve done things I would never admit publicly.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have never seen a candidate for any office have to spend so much time dealing with one offhand insult. It’s truly a testament to how bad he is at damage control. He doesn’t just gaff, they layer on top of each other.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be honest, as a childless cat owner, a really charismatic candidate could probably have doubled down and we wouldn’t still be talking about it. Their voters don’t give a fuck, but to keep trying to pretend you didn’t say the thing you said is dragging it out unnecessarily

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

yeah, that's what i keep thinking about. Trump would've washed himself of this 3 seconds after he said it. i think the only winning move here would've been to double down. might not have won them anyone new, but their base would've eaten it up.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

sarcasm noun sar·casm / ˈsär-ˌka-zəm

1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain

2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual

2b: the use or language of sarcasm

I must be missing how that's any better. "Oh, I meant to insult them in a satirical way."

Regardless, it still sounds like something a couchfucker would say.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right, so with this it's no longer just Actual Childless Cat Ladies, but rather anyone single is now a childless cat lady, and they mean it as an insult.

[–] cloud_herder@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Haha same - clarifying that an asshole sarcastic comment is sarcastic doesn’t make it not an asshole comment.

Many people (hopefully most) knew it was sarcasm.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 36 points 2 years ago

It's a joke! When you give me that look it's a joke

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

This has big

energy.

[–] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 2 years ago

We know he wasn't as the 'clean-up' from the fallout caused by a supposed sarcastic remark is truly a secondary gaff. You were serious, couch fucker, and we know it. So go make sweet love to couches, you weirdo, and leave US citizens alone.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

THAT'S NOT EVEN HOW SARCASM WORKS

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m a childless cat man.

[–] recreationalplacebos@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Better than a cat-less man-child.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m surprised he’s so Republican, seeing as his wife is Indian (India) and he has mixed race kids.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

He's whatever gives him the best chance of increasing his power and influence.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I was being sarcastic /s

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

What about catless child-ladies, can we deport those?

Oh wait, Im not Murikan, nvm.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Thats weird