this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
386 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

86745 readers
2884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 135 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and while we had constant outrage from Recall, I assume we'll hear nothing about this from people

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

Seeing your screen when prompted is not the same as recording your screen

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Gemini is already creeping me out with all the personal information Google is injecting into the AI context. So far I've seen my name, location and if I remember right, which vehicle I drive. Who knows what else is in there. I use DDG whenever I can, but sometimes a Google search is the only way to actually find something, so I see the Gemini junk as I'm scrolling down.

Is there any way to have that info deleted and no longer collected or used by Google? Or is that kind of thing only for the lucky people in Europe?

EDIT: Found it here: https://myactivity.google.com/product/gemini?hl=en-US

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can use startpage. It just proxies your searches to google, so you get the same results as a direct google search. I think you can also use !g on DDG.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'll have to try out !g, thanks a lot!

EDIT: Tried it and it just redirected to google.com. I was hoping it would have kept me on DDG for privacy and just presented a first page of results or something like that.

EDIT 2: Startpage is great! This will be my go-to when DDG doesn't work out.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I use DDG whenever I can, but sometimes a Google search is the only way to actually find something

Do you have an example of something you had to use Google for because you couldn't find it with DDG?

Edited to add, four replies later and no specific examples. I am not trying to shill for DDG or anything here, I'm trying to get real, specific examples.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not OP, but its true. There have been times I've searched and tweaked like 7 times. Go to google with my original text and its the first link. This is not common though.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm really curious where things fall short for people. I haven't used Google for years at this point, and I don't miss it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

DDG's search is pretty bad

For me, I !g sometimes when I'm searching for specific gifs, and DDG isn't getting me the results I need. For the most part, that's it.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I tried switching to ddg several times over the last decade or so and always gave up because of issues like this, especially with technical or obscure topics. Recently started paying for Kagi and do not have the same issues at all there. The results are good and nicely presented without ads. Of course, on the flip side it’s pretty expensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m trying to get real, specific examples.

Asking for unnecessary specifics and details is usually a sign not that the person wants to be helpful but that they disagree and are looking for ammunition to argue and feel superior. Ultimately the exchange becomes a waste of everyone's time, as the person inevitably becomes rude, condescending and argumentative. Basically, some people online think they're smarter than everyone else, or at least want to project that. They believe they have the only valid argument and they're going to prove it to the world and probably think that they've won because they had the last word when in reality everyone left because they realized the person was not arguing in good faith. I'm not claiming you're that type of person, but I suspect that's why nobody is giving you specifics.

Wouldn't have mentioned anything but you did ask.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MBM@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you really want to use Google but without the Gemini junk, &udm=14 is your friend

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks! I think I prefer startpage.com (which I only just learned about due to this thread) because it doesn't redirect to google.com. But this is also good to know about just in case.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh no!

What ever will they do without my data!?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every day, I grow happier for having ditched Google's version of Android for GrapheneOS.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Worldwide we need to all build up GrapheneOS to be the new default for all of us

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meh. It's still mainly backed by Google in the end. I'd rather coalesce around mobile Linux. It's not ready yet but that's far preferable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's things like this that got me to start looking at Librewolf.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used to use WebKit based browsers like w3m and terminal based browsers like lynx. Also used a lot of terminal based apps for things, not really for security but because my netbooks single core atom chip sucked. I noticed though that I essentially avoided cookies, ads, and trackers by accident. I've been thinking of going back to a thermal based life. Now I'm wondering if there are terminal based apps for Lemmy and mastadon.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Now I'm wondering if there are terminal based apps for Lemmy and mastadon.

Mastodon, yes. I've not found one for Lemmy.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I would have to check out the API for Lemmy to see how easy it would be to make a minimal terminal CLI would be to make. I hate making stuff publicly because I usually only want what I need to work, but I could make a repo and see if anyone else is interested in expanding on it.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anyone still using Chrome deserves it

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe innocent people who aren’t as technically literate as you that also happen to be using Chrome don’t deserve for their rights to be infringed upon? If that’s an unpopular thought then so be it I suppose.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's true.

Anyone in this community that is still using Chrome definitely deserves it, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

Not if it's not installed on my Linux laptop....

[–] vane@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now do

Chrome can now suggest you files from your and your friends hard drives

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The headline seems a little inflammatory. It requires the user to explicitly select a region to share.

Google is making Gemini a lot more aware of what's happening inside Chrome. The company has started rolling out a new "Select from screen" feature that lets users highlight specific text or images from a webpage and send them directly to Gemini, making conversations with the AI assistant far more contextual.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's baffling that over and over and over, every fucking time a corporation does this shit, there's someone willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I like to deal with facts and measured responses instead of being instantly reactionary 🤷

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

Which is fair, but in the context of the day, and of our history, skepticism is appropriate

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At some point, you become a useful idiot.

Don't fall for the trap. These people do not deserve the benefit of the doubt about anything. Stop giving it to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fact that it can do it in the first place means it can do it at all. Just because they require the selection now, doesn't mean they aren't harvesting telemetry 24/7, and won't "accidentally" enable this feature later.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or just lie to you it’s not on, they have zero reason to not run this 24/7 they will not be caught

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

they will not be caught

They would get caught tho, there's always some turbo nerd that has a network monitor up and will notice the traffic being sent out. I do it sometimes when I actually have to use chrome, but that's just my growing distrust of Google.

Now, whether or not they face repercussions is another story.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, it can definitely read the entire browser window, fill out and click through forms etc etc. i know, I’ve used it.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That might be true, but it sounds like like a completely different feature than what the article is discussing. This is talking about a new feature that requires the user to select a specific section of the page in order to make it visible to the I'm LLM.

I am a little confused though, as to why this new feature would be needed if it could already read the entire screen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I get increasingly jaded with every bit of news that basically says "yet another reason to not use Google, integrated/agentic AI etc." When will it be enough to make even IT-illiterates consider?

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I mean people still use MicroSlop everyday, so I don't think there will 'ever' be a time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Shiny reflective metal that blinds you to what's behind it.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, thanks 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Karl@literature.cafe 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have chrome installed on my phone without my consent

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

I have Google shit apps installed on my phone without consent.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can deactivate it though and revoke all data usage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›