this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5059 readers
130 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The datasets were proof of the theft of creative work, according to music licensing organisation APRA AMCOS, which represents 128,000 members in Australasia.

“Major tech platforms have not come to the table. Not once. Instead, they have lobbied governments, circulated policy papers, and proposed solutions designed to extinguish any obligation to pay,” its chief executive, Dean Ormston said.

Two large screens hang side by side in a darkened gallery, each with the same image of Cate Blanchett at a lectern.

Australia’s intellectual property laws hold that permission should be granted and terms, such as payment, agreed on before copyright works are used, but the IT industry has pushed for text and data mining exemptions to the laws.

In August 2025, the Productivity Commission floated changes that would have legalised AI companies using content without paying creators, but the federal government ruled out the changes in October.>

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nigel@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't it be wonderful if, on the heals of everyone copying our teen social media laws, Australia we're to introduce a mandatory per token royalty for copyright holder not proved to be excluded from the training data, and everyone in the world were to follow suit.

We've got to assume anything ever written, photographed, spoken, or recorded has been scraped, so the burden of proof needs to be to prove it wasn't used or derived from.

Otherwise all copyright is dead. Why can an AI company steal work, but someone else not?

If Men at Work can be sued for taking a riff from a kids song, then surely