this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
639 points (98.5% liked)

Political Memes

12170 readers
1870 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 64 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re not doing anything for me. Let them leave.

[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Like they left Mamdani's New York 😄

Relevant Futurama

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 4 points 3 weeks ago

They can live on their yachts.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 49 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Even if it were true who cares? If they aren't actually paying taxes then what is the point in having them?

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 weeks ago

"But look at all the jobs we're creating!"

-Billionaire CEO who just announced a new round of layoffs

[–] VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think they view us as a bank. We need to make them money or they will transfer to another bank. Simple.

That is very very apt

Plus sometimes banks have perks that keep the customer staying after all, and I believe I’ve heard of various scandinavian billionaires, for example, threatening to leave but then staying because their country offered them benefits beyond even their ungodly wealth

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~Trickle~~ Piss down economics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The amendment defines Retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings to include "pensions; retirement accounts, including but not limited to 401 (k) accounts, 403(b) accounts, and all other individual retirement accounts; mutual funds; and all personal property, whether tangible or intangible, including but not limited to financial assets, investment accounts, business interests, digital assets, intellectual property, personal belongings, and other assets used to produce or collect income or savings for retirement or financial planning."

Jesus, that's an Orwellian bill name.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

My biggest concern is:

Ballotpedia has not located a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure. You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

If no one is declaring opposition, this will definitively pass.

[–] lostme@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

At that point is there anything that doesn't fit this definition? xdd

I guess income that goes to luxury things such as groceries and bills would still get taxed

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

WA’s rich are leaving? Another tax on wealth smashes records by tripling the amount coming in from last year

“This morning we got the updated numbers for fiscal year 2026 for capital gains … it came in at $1.5 billion,” economist Dave Reich told state lawmakers earlier this month. “So a very significant increase, quite a bit above our forecast from what we had before.”

This is understating things by a fair bit. Last year this tax raised $584 million. So the revenue, which is a preliminary figure pending delayed returns, appears to have nearly tripled in one year. It quadrupled from the year before that.

This is not what the critics of tax-the-rich schemes said should happen. They predicted tax proceeds would deteriorate as rich people moved away or structured their finances to avoid paying it.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, rich people do what they want to do, leaving isn't one of them. They make too much money where they are, why would they leave. They need us way more than we need them

[–] manxu@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

What is it people say? "It doesn't hurt to ask." In this case, billionaires can save a pretty penny by paying a few "influencers" and "intellectuals" to doomsday the tax away. In reality, the pittance they pay in wealth tax is not reason enough for any of them to move.

Even if they have to pay a 5% one-time wealth tax (CA proposal), that's nothing compared to what ordinary people have to pay in taxes, and ordinary people actually need that money.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

The Epstein class deserve to be binned. They're worse than garbage. They're parasites.

[–] Siegehammer85@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

With such wealth they should fall under military rules, you run, you run with wealth stolen from the country and could become a threat to the country, you will be classified as a traitor and enemy and will be pursued militarily. Total loss off all assets and potentially terminated. That would be the solution.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

American citizens can't escape the tax man. Unless you renounce your citizenship.

And if you're REALLY that scared of a myth, put a progressive exit tax on their wealth. 100% over 1 billion. They built that wealth by exploiting America and its working class, so it's just a repossession at that point.

[–] Nooodel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Love the idea. Don't even need to go after any personal wealth they have, just all the stocks. Chief exploitation manager leaving? Great. Get out. Take your Ferrari and your Villa. Keep it. But you get to stop exploiting people on the same day.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

You know how billionaires always compete in having the most expensive house, yacht, space company or whatever.

Make them complete over the most expensive country to live in for billionaires. Show of your wealth by living here!

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Can we just skip to the eating billionaires part? There are clearly some lessons that need to be made so they may be learned.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

I say someone will replace them if their business is needed. If it's not needed then them leaving isn't a threat.

Gary Stevenson would like a word in.

He is quite clear that yes they can leave, and we can tax them at the point where money is created instead of abroad where we have no influence.

They can move, but their properties remain over here

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s far fewer of them than us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starik@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Must be an expensive trash bag. I’d be picking egg shells off the lawn after trying that.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

What's the use of billionaires if you can't use their fancy trash bags when you bin them.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Great, this way money will circulate in the economy again instead of getting hoarded by a small minority

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Somehow this is really mesmerizing.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's got a strange This Is America choreography to it.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking kill them already, they're killing my country! I hope they suffer a lot and that their corpses be thrown on some vomit/poop pit.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That garbage bag will eventually rupture spewing its insides everywhere if you do this regularly so do you want that to happen to billionaires too??

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

I would lick their intestines off the ground

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

God I hope so. Maybe they'll all get in a rocket and try to leave Earth. A girl can dream

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Switorik@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

If we're not making money on them, why do we care if they stay? I say pay your part or good riddance!

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They make/made their money off of us. Don't let them just leave with it.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm even down for them to take their fake money with them, just gtfo

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Will they promise to leave?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

There's a simple truth that more people need to hear.

With a few exceptions, police and the military do not serve billionaires, they serve the State.

The billionaires know this, which is why they work so hard to control or dismantle the State. But they are all cowards and use proxies that can be replaced.

If the people manage to overcome the active resistance to take control of the state, there's very little the billionaires can do when the federal marshalls show up at their door.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There a clean version of the gif for memeing purposes?

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Where to another place where they will pay taxes to play..

load more comments
view more: next ›