Getting real tired of everyone calling everything AI these days. Machine learning doesn't mean AI
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
47 points (82.2% liked)
Technology
86563 readers
3026 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
As someone in the know i agree, but for the "common folk" out there with a very limited tech background, it's probably the easiest way to get the point what was used across.
No it's just straight up lazy and leading people to believe ChatGPT is out there solving archeological problems and is actually valuable. Just call it machine learning and go. Most non tech people won't care, and they won't keep having that association reinforced.
You've got a point there, i did not take into account that this reinforces the perception of LLMs as something close to AGI (which was pushed heavily by Altman and Amodei).
The other problem is the "um actually the field of ML is a subset of AI" people because, technically machine learning is a subset of the field of artificial intelligence mathematics.
But them acting like that isn't doing the devil's dirty work to "um actually" at everyone is absurd.
I don't see how using terms correctly is doing "the devils work" if anything its a useful corrective to "chat bots do all the things" to explain to people that AI is an umbrella term that includes many things.
Without over-disclosing: I work in a highly technical field. We've done considerable assessment of LLMs and our conclusion so far is that they're largely useless to us. But since long before the LLM craze, we've also been exploring ML applications, and some of those have been yielding interesting results.
Both are flavors of AI. It's just that one is in a massive hype cycle right now, so correcting unreasonable expectations is a necessity.
Language needs to change because it’s completely undecipherable to lay people. I use all sorts of models to great effect in my work. Random forests, LSTMs, SVMs, etc all have tons of great uses. I am pretty anti “AI” as lay people understand it (though the technology is super cool on a technical level)
On the plus side, I can much more easily convince people to use any sort of machine learning models than I used to be able to by calling it AI.
On Lemmy if you support ai in any way you get called a genocide supporter because they used ai
Don't expect then to understand the difference or even be able to rub two braincells together
People, please open the article before spouting non-sense. There are some cool images and videos that would make your life a lot easier.
They did not ask chatgpt to convert files like the news a few scrolls up about converting pdf to slideshow.
They are using statistical models to figure out ink from fibre on ancient burned scrolls, from x-ray and CT scan data. Then other techniques to unroll them, so scientists can read and compare with other works.
Pretty much going from this
To this
This is the sort of stuff I was excited about AI for in the 2010s when development started showing results. Before tech(bro) companies ruined the term.
I wish AI wasnt used so broadly as a term
You mean the "AI powered" labels on my laptop, bookshelf and lawnmower aren't all talking about the same thing?
"AI. Please turn up the lights" /s
I could have made shit up for a fraction of the cost.
Not all AI works like LLMs. It doesn't go into much detail, but similar use of AI in the past has been for converting handwritten samples into a more legible form or separating superimposed letters.
Manually filling in "G__d mor_ing" is doable, but I can see how AI can make that process better. It's technically just guessing, but so is a person in that scenario and the person will have less data to use to guess from.
One cool ML application was examining medieval manuscripts and being able to tell which passages were written by different scribes. That in turn yielded information about how scriptoria were organized, and also showed that some texts (books of hours, religious texts) were assigned to single highly skilled scribes, while other texts (usually more mercantile) were more cheaply done using multiple less-skilled scribes.
There's also been some interesting work on guessing how to fill in lacunae (gaps in a manuscript due to damage or compounded transcription errors).
It’s technically just guessing, but so is a person in that scenario and the person will have less data to use to guess from.
There are other contextual clues that aid the guessing: in particular, the size of the space where the characters are missing, and sometimes grammatical inflections in surrounding words that imply what kind of word is missing (say, a verb or an adjective). That's where experienced human experts can often perform well.
That's extremely disrespectful to the researchers who have built and trained the machine learning model. And the process of extracting useful data from a charred scroll. That's a tremendous undertaking. AI is not just ChatGPT and LLMs.
Why can't we discuss the Roman Empire in this thread?? Imagine the cool shit hidden in those scrolls