this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
384 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

86131 readers
3247 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/electricvehicles/p/2162853/usa-slate-s-new-electric-truck-will-cost-slightly-more-than-24950

Range is said to be 205 mi (330 km), higher than the original estimate. This price is for the basic truck. The SUV configuration is expected to be $5000 more.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago (22 children)

As Canadian…

American company?, nope

Owned by Bezos?, hell nah

[–] XLE@piefed.social 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bezos was one investor, not the owner

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Slate raised at least $111 million in Series A financing, including an undisclosed amount from Bezos. Slate then raised $600 million in 2024 from Mark Walter, the controlling owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers and CEO of Guggenheim Partners, Jeff Bezos, and General Catalyst, a venture capital firm.[5] In mid-2026, the company said it had completed a $650m series C investment round, which took its total capital raised to $1.4bn.[6]

source

Bezos was seed money AND part of the owner conglomerate that raised all the capital the company started with in 2024. That is enough for me to avoid this like the plague as it will, certain as the sun is hot, be enshitified to the core

If you do not believe me, here is an article explaining how this is all a big Amazon initiative

https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/08/inside-the-ev-startup-secretly-backed-by-jeff-bezos/

[–] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

I would truly not be surprised that this would be an attempt to take over there ev truck market, but manufacturers should have been paying attention. There's a huge market for small ass trucks, no one is catering to it

While I'm sure they'll try to enshittify, the downside to that plan is that they need to make sure no one takes their place and they need to have something people want that they can enshittify. The benefit of simplicity is that it makes it simpler for another manufacturer to pick up the slack.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I drove a small truck at one point. Think a late 90s Tacoma, Ranger, or something like that. I don't want an F250. I don't want a Ram 3500. I just want to be able to haul a bed full of bikes to the MTB trail and help my friends move a washing machine.

[–] tychosmoose@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Slate has a size comparison widget on their website. You can show it with the silhouette of a current full size pickup and a circa 1985 small pickup. It's almost exactly the same size as that generation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There’s a huge market for small ass trucks, no one is catering to it

Absolutely correct. The American car makers keep on saying "we only want big trucks" but that is complete BS, there is plenty of demand for smaller trucks which is why they have lobbied the gov to all but ban any possible import

The benefit of simplicity is that it makes it simpler for another manufacturer to pick up the slack.

While this is true in theory, in practice it rarely shows up. If these trucks do deliver a good, simple experience at $25K, others would not be able to just copy it and catch up. It would be easier for any of the big guys to just buy the company.

If the company is not for sale, then they would have the monopoly on small trucks and thus, freedom to enshitify

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Same as a European, I do hope it succeeds though and as much as I hate bezos if he's backing shit like this my opinion of him has increased by about 3.83%.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Canajan@piefed.ca 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For the life of me I don’t know why we don’t develop something like this in Canada. It’s so frustrating, we have the people, the manufacturing space, the materials, we could do this.

Whenever something about Canada making vehicles gets brought up, all the nay sayers climb on immediately saying how it can’t be done. I’m sick and tired of them. Nothing worth doing comes easy, if left to these naysayers we’d all be still living in squalor.

We need to move away from the U.S. entanglement, the American public can’t be trusted to elect a proper government.

Building our own low cost, modest feature vehicles would be an excellent start. How many features of a car do people use for a normal commute to work, or such? I’d love a truck like the Slate, except it has to have 4 wheel drive ability. After having Hondas with all wheel drive, I’ll never go back to an older 2 wheel drive vehicle.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] The_Jit@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Interesting, the telematics module is sold separately at $275.00. So for everyone worrying about spying, for this vehicle you got to opt-in and pay extra for it.

https://www.slate.auto/en/store/ACCIT010?fromCategoryId=accessories_interior&fromSubcategoryId=accessories_interior_tech

[–] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Never mind the low price, not having that shit built in is the killer feature for me, making it the only new car I would even consider buying. (It's just too bad they won't have a 4x4 version for another couple of years.)

It is kinda good that there's an optional module available, though, because it means there's an interface that, in theory, a third-party module running Free Software could hook into.

[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

because it means there's an interface that, in theory, a third-party module running Free Software could hook into

Absolutely this!

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 week ago

I hate the state of current website reporting.

so many sites give so much information but absolutely refuses to provide the original website or source. Instead, deciding to send the viewer through ClickHell as they try to navigate their own website sending the user in circles usually via links that go to their own pages to propagate views/clicks. I hate it

How hard is it to just link to the Slate's main webpage after reporting on the product that way, the viewer can look at it themselves. Not one of the web pages they link there or any of the pages in said links lead to the actual vehicles site that they are reporting on.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hello Nissan and Toyota. Where are your small EV and hybrid pick-up trucks?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The new Hilux does have both mhev and bev version.

Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Hilux

Seems like it's available everywhere except america

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 11 points 1 week ago

lol, they're $66,000 in Canada.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Something about this vehicle not mentioned: Because of the easily replaced plastic panels, insurance should be a lot less expensive.

But of course, meth heads are going to start stealing panels now.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they sell enough trucks for meth heads to profit in the grey market by stealing the plastic panels, that's a huge win

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

And do what with them? Scrap yard don't buy plastic.

[–] tychosmoose@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Enter the aftermarket replacement panel bolts with security heads. Now they can only mangle the panels while trying to remove them!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago

The concept is a good one. The marketing and financial backing is bad. I think an affordable ev would be a good thing, but this is America.

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This sounds nice for someone who needs a truck. But I have lots of kids. Why can’t I get an EV minivan for under $50k?

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They’re offering a 5 seat SUV body as well. Not a minivan, but, closer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The original price of 24950 included the federal tax rebate. This is why they used cheaper batteries and other cost cutting to try to keep the price the same. The rebates are gone.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

FYI: it looks like slate has switched battery chemistry and suppliers. They will now be using LFP batteries. Cheaper, but they'll last longer. Especially if you charge them to 100% and discharge them below 15%.

An overall win, as there was a zero chance I would have bought one if they put the NMC batteries in it they were going to use.

There will no longer be battery options for a small 150 mile range battery or a bigger battery that would go around 240 miles, though. Now (due to LFP batteries not being as energy dense) there's only going to be one battery option that they claim will have a 205 mile range.

Unfortunately for me, this means I won't be getting one. I need to go 180 miles round trip between charges, and that's just cutting it way too close. Especially during winter time when the range would be reduced by quite a bit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You'd have to be a massive idiot to think buying into a Bezos led infrastructure won't nickle and dime them to death down the road....

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tbh that kinda sounds like the point from the start. The price they give is the base-base. Like, an absolute barebones build. Any color you want as long as it's grey.

But making each individual add-on available...individually...is pretty damn sweet. And also making them available after-market...presumably in an easy-to-install method (kinda figure to be scalable it must be, otherwise the build-to-order model would flop at the assembly line), is icing on the cake.

It sucks that it's a Bezos initiative, otherwise I'd be yelling to shut up and take my money. A basic-ass EV two-seater that can handle light open loads is exactly what I want. And one that is (seemingly) user-servicable? Hell yeah. AND A FRUNK TO BOOT!

But if bezos is behind it, it's instantly sus. More sus than any other billionaire, save for a handful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheDeadInternet@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hard pass for me for various reasons but I hope this does well enough to make other auto companies want to compete.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (32 children)

Meanwhile in germany that's the cost of a compact car EV...

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] LightDelaBlue@jlai.lu 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

oh its from the usa and bezos involved? well no thanks.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

My buildout went to $33,600 for fastback with roof rack and speakers

While that’s a lot more than base, it’s exactly what I want and it’s still a great price compared to any other EV available to me. The only thing it would really not be good at is road trips but I still have my model Y

But as a big and tall guy I would never buy a vehicle without trying it to see if it’s comfortable for me ….. and to see if I can remove the back seats and fit it out as a camper. (My brother is doing that with a sienna hybrid and he probably has the right idea: lack of range could be a problem if you want to camp for a week with no electric)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The range is now 205 miles, from a 63-kWh battery.

That's... Not that great. For comparison, the 2022 Chevy Bolt has a similar sized battery (65kWh) but about 260 miles of range. The weight's a little less than the slate at 3,600 lbs though it still wouldn't be enough to gap the difference in performance. There's either some heavy drag introduced by the truck or some drive system inefficiencies.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (26 children)

I don't understand the obsession with range. I agree that efficiency is important, but who is regularly driving a pickup truck 200 miles in a day?

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Rural people, as in the folks who actually have a use for pickups. As it so happens, it is about 200 miles round-trip to my nearest airport/major city, so if this were my vehicle, I'd have to take a charge break when picking someone up/dropping them off at the airport, or making a shopping run, or going to a concert/special event, or seeing a medical specialist. And I'm not even that far off the beaten path; I have family for whom the one-way drive to their nearest major city/airport is over 200mi. Plus if you're hauling anything, I'd imagine that range goes down quick.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I would say probably the boxy front and truck bed. They have to do the range tests on the base model so I wonder if it would improve the range with the SUV mod

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pickups have better aero without a bed cap.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Only 2 doors for the SUV is pretty wonky.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

Yep. Seen this schtick a hundred times.

Now that the seal is broken on price hikes, it'll climb more and more. About the time it reaches double, the project will be canceled. Investors will be screwed, and some slimeball will run off with the cash just like he always planned to.

Just like all the other ones.

no screens!? I'm sold. would be perfect for me to have a little around town truck like this. but it will be $80,000 by the time I can actually buy one. and I'm sure it tracks everything you do and everywhere you go.

load more comments
view more: next ›