this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
836 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11859 readers
2210 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 135 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Natural uranium mostly emits alpha particles. It’s dangerous if you eat or inhale it, but the wood in the nightstand drawer is going to be enough to block them.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Paper and skin can stop alpha particles. Glass, plastic, or a little bit of metal can stop beta. It's gamma that will get you, often because of what the gamma does through the material, knocking off new particles as it exits.

The uranium in one of these kits probably had the same potency as the radium pendants you can buy now. It's fine as long as it stays in its container and never gets inside your body.

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course gamma will get you, she beat cancer countless times. Gamma is badass.

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bruce Banner approves this message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So let me get this straight. Radiation causes cancer. But radiation also cures cancer. Do you guys seriously believe this shit?

/s because I've written more obvious satire before, only to be interpreted seriously

[–] dronarnia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When people need help after injuries from a knife, what happens? Surgeons go at them with little knives. What a scam.

You know what they say - when the only tool you have is a knife, all your problems get stabbed.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reason for this is a little bit of radiation damages your DNA causing the cells to go haywire, whereas a lot of radiation kills the cells outright.

So if you get cancer, you blast the cancer cells with radiation to wipe them out. The radiation is targeted so you don't wipe out healthy cells.

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How are they able to target cancer cells?

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Very carefully.

Literally, it's like they aim a laser at it

[–] dangrousperson@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With physics.

The particles lose energy roughly depending on their inverse velocity(=>energy) squared

What that means is that high energy particles deposit little energy at first, but as they gradually slow down they deposit more and more. There is a peak where most of the energy is deposited, depending on the starting energy and density of material (tissue). This is called the Bragg Peak and having non-constant (range of) starting energies you can specify a range of dosage deposition instead of a single point.

Bragg Peak

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If you think this is obvious satire, then I have to wonder when was the last time you actually spoke to an average human person? There are people on this site who would unironically say something like that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Answer: It depends on the amount and qualities of the uranium, as well as how it is stored.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Glass vial, not bad, not great.

Seriously though, those older chem sets had natural samples, so likely not enough to really do damage unless you used it as a jade stone or suppository.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or decide to do a little stone polishing or carving. Don’t breathe this!

[–] Micans@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

Now I need to go check and see if the Blend-Tec youtube channel still exists

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

fun fact: low doses of radiation are actually known to reduce cancer rates. there's quite a bit of research into it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis#Radiation

In Taiwan, recycled radiocontaminated steel was inadvertently used in the construction of over 100 apartment buildings, causing the long-term exposure of 10,000 people. The average dose rate was 50 mSv/year and a subset of the population (1,000 people) received a total dose over 4,000 mSv over ten years. In the widely used linear no-threshold model used by regulatory bodies, the expected cancer deaths in this population would have been 302 with 70 caused by the extra ionizing radiation, with the remainder caused by natural background radiation. The observed cancer rate, though, was quite low at 7 cancer deaths when 232 would be predicted by the LNT model had they not been exposed to the radiation from the building materials. Ionizing radiation hormesis appears to be at work.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That was the one topic that always baked my noodle at DoE. In animal tests the low dose group consistently outlived the controls. I wanted to write papers on the topic but consistently got shot down. The upper tiers were worried about public perception of "radiation can be good" papers.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah that'd absolutely result in a lot of Americans giving themselves cancer

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Modded Minecraft ruined my mind because this reminded me of a time when opening a wooden chest full of plutonium gave me radiation poisoning and ruined my deathless playground. My mate picked it up after and then also immediately died. Stupid dragons and their stupid plutonium.

[–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That sounds fun

Which modpack was that?

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Enigmatica 2 Expert. A fun mix of mods produced a Fire and Ice Dragon that had treasure loot from Industrial Craft 2... you're supposed to handle radioactive materials with proper safety gear. Who'd have thought? Lol

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, 1.12 really was the golden age of Minecraft mods

[–] ProfessorHoover@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

1.21 is a bit of a renaissance, especially with the amazing things the create family can do.

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Kind of reminds me of my step-mother. It's not the lifetime of heavy chain smoking that caused/causes her to keep getting cancer and worsening respiratory illness. It's the chemicals "they put in everything". It's "they used to put mercury in our vaccines". It's "all the drugs they make you take these days". It's blamed on everything else and the 60+ years of almost non-stop cigarette smoking just contributed but didn't cause it.

And, of course, plenty of common things besides cigarette smoke can cause cancer, so it's not like I'm denying that. Just that Occam's Razor being what it is, I'm going with the simplest and most obvious explanation that there's evidence of to explain all the health issues.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 19 points 1 month ago

It's such a common thing in medicine, mental health, weight loss, IT troubleshooting, etc. It's not impossible that the answer is complex, but we always feel like we're a special case and it can't possibly be as simple as "eat less", "get more sleep", "turn it off and on again".

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the argument that cigarette companies used for a long time to avoid accountability. It wasn't the fault of the cigarettes. It's all those contributing factors.

I saw a lot of that during lockdown. "She didn't die from COVID! She died of pneumonia!" Wow, a lot of people are dying from pneumonia this year! That isn't normal, is it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My dad recently got bladder cancer fortunately they are well off enough financially that they are able to pay for treatments, thank God!

But I learned that the over 20 years of drinking was less likely to cause the bladder cancer than the fact that he smoked cigarettes. Belive it or not cigarettes have a higher risk of inducing bladder cancer whereas alcohol is more likely to destroy your liver and kidney directly.

He was also exposed to a shit load of chemicals throughout his entire life.

Cancer is a hell of a thing and I don't wish it on anyone.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If it's contained in glass or something and not just an open canister of powder, it's actual fairly innocuous

You can take uranium rocks from the US and transport them in a commercial airline over the world.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

And you'll be exposed to more radiation from being at cruising altitude than from the rocks!

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

yeah because uranium actually decays so slowly that the radiation it gives off is barely worth mentioning. the actually hazardous stuff is what comes out of nuclear power plants spent fuel rods.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Part of it is the decay frequency but also how it decays. Uranium238 does an alpha decay that can’t penetrate the glass

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

And yet, she's 95 and has survived cancer multiple times...

[–] Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or the fabled Fiestaware™©® relish trays lol.

[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

https://youtube.com/shorts/Dd2Bn_YshSA

Bring a Geiger counter to an antique store to find these spicy plates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you've had cancer "more time than you can count," have you ever really beaten it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

Realistically if it's in a vile in a draw the wood and glass probably blocks most of the radiation. It probably won't be that high purity if it's from a 1940s toy set

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She has lived so long with uranium next to her for much of her life? This needs to be studied, maybe she's onto something

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This reminded me of the Japan/smoking/lifespan thing. Turns out decent healthcare is pretty helpful. The most helpful, really, when it comes to determining average length of stay on this hellrock.

There's also that thing about pretending old family members aren't really dead so they can keep cashing their pension checks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Uranium glass is relatively safe reddit assured me, for whatever that is worth.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Naturally occuring Uranium is, really, not very radioactive. You can even eat it and have it pass through your digestive system without any significant negative impact - there was a scientist who (slightly facetiously) used to do this in lectures to prove the safety of nuclear power and lived to a ripe old age. That said, it's not exactly advisable.

We use it in power plants because it's fissile, not because it's radioactive, it's easier to sustain chain reactions with constant output.

Spent nuclear fuel, however, is extremely radioactive because when we fission Uranium it splits into very radioactive isotopes of Caesium, Iodine, Xenon etc. plus a ton of minor actinides.

[–] j5906@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well it was from an old chemistry set, I would be impressed if it had 95% purity and god knows what the other 5% are.

Also it depends a little bit on how big the vial was, a small HPLC vial may only have contained 100mg, the buttplug style vial they often use to showcase ores/salts may contain like 1kg of it. And also if it was properly sealed or just plugged.

Last factor would be time, a Prof swallowing 10mg once a year has contact with this stuff for 60 days, but lets say she got it from her brother when he was age 15 that would mean semi-close contact 8 hours a day for 80 years. Also the Prof hopefully didnt swallow more of it as uranium apart from being radioactive is also toxix although it takes like 8g to kill one, given the density thats not a too big pill to swallow.

Finally its still only a chance, every bit of radioactivity that hits you could be the one causing cancer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think this was uranium glass but a glass vial of uranium that was likely a part of those Atomic Lab kits they sold to kids in the 1940's and 50's.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] charokol@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But she apparently keeps getting cancer…

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Yes, like millions of people who don't have any uranium. Hmm.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"You kids today and your bike helmets. We played with radioactive isotopes, and it toughened us by god!"

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

By the way: same issue with alcohol and tobacco.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

...I'm addicted to nicotine because there's uranium somewhwre nearby? 🤨

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›