this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
235 points (100.0% liked)

News

38056 readers
1439 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House officials have for months delayed the release of a U.S. government report that outlines what it describes as significant vulnerabilities in the nation's voting machines ahead of the November midterms, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

The report, produced by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, concludes that voting ‌machines could be further safeguarded by, for example, updating their software, the sources said. It does not say the vulnerabilities have led to votes flipping, but examines security gaps in how the machines are used during U.S. elections.

Some White House officials have argued the report could undermine voter confidence, particularly among Republicans. Others have said they do not believe the report goes far enough in supporting Donald Trump’s false claims that the 2020 presidential election was rigged, the three sources said. Some Democrats said privately they worried Gabbard’s probe into voting machines would be used by the administration to push states to use paper ballots.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

Because he’s gonna call on his old pal Elon to help out again.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Funfact: Republicans bought Dominion Voting and renamed it to Liberty Votes. Dominion Voting was previously the voting machine provider for U.S. voting - even as States have their own maintenance team (as is my understanding).

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

of course.

It says nothing was wrong, the overwhelming majority of attempts to cheat the system have been caught, and are from republicans.

So they're gonna suppress it until just before the election, where they'll release some bullshit blaming liberals and illegals, so theres just enough time to enflame the idiots without having the time think about how stupid it is and listen to the debunking

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

paywall bullshit

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 hours ago

They want to release it a week or so before the election, then use that as an excuse for draconian voter suppression measures, leaving no time to appeal.

Someone needs to FOIA that stuff ASAP.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

The only way to prevent all those issues with voting machines is to get rid of them.

There is no way that a voting machine fulfills the demands for a fair, secret, democratic, tamper-resistant vote. It is basically mathematically impossible to perform a proper democratic vote on a machine.

[–] Nytefyre@piefed.social 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why, are we working on the final touches as to how it can be rigged?

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

“Can be rigged” lol

-Elon

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Their likely endgame is to ban all the machines that are harder to rig, and mandate the use of the ones that they have already rigged.

They'll also try to ban more transparent processes such as hand-counting of physical ballots.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I mean, they already bought the machine producer company Dominion Voting in 2025 to rebrand as Liberty Votes.

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think with an admin that could be vindicated with a release of this study NOT releasing it tells you all you need to know.

The study likely doesn't conclude what they've been harping for years.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Or it did find evidence of vote manipulation, but not in the direction they have been screeching about. Every accusation is a confession, after all.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Or they found evidence of manipulation, at such a minuscule level that it doesn't affect election results, but they want to hype it like it's something that matters, and don't want to give anyone time to refute their bullshit.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I mean yeah, screw it. I wanna believe in the voting system but the guy's been on calls with state representatives being like "Gimme sum voots."

Conveniently the whole narrative is about their opponents conveniently cheating? Psh.

Yeah his type only win when they cheat, and you're right, they're almost always incompetently, red-handedly, stupidly guilty of whatever they were blowhard accusing the other side of.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 9 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Paper ballots are good you dumb motherfuckers. Fully electronic voting can be rigged with 0 evidence. Fucking one firmware patch that self deletes after polls close is literally all it takes on multiple models from multiple manufacturers who are mostly owned by billionaires now.

FUCK! 🤬 democrats can't even be pissed off at the right part of this.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly this. You are just telling your vote to someone (some machine) that pinkie promises to count it correctly with no asurance whatsoever.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

And to be clear they do make electronic machines with auditable paper. Those are cool.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

Assuming it is implemented well, yes! If the audit paper is a QR code that no one will reasonably check, then it is not worth much.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Except the ones that added blockchain.....

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 23 hours ago

waiting for the results to see if they want to say they have issues or not.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The report, produced by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, concludes that voting ‌machines could be further safeguarded by, for example, updating their software, the sources said.

Are voting machines connected to the internet???

I mean, yeah, updating software is nearly always better for security, but why wouldn't you just run the machines disconnected for max security?

[–] GuerillaGorillas@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I imagine they’d just be updated via a USB drive or something similar, no need for a wi-fi adapter.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Someone could still get isolated access to one, and it's not a bad idea to ensure that the firmware is as robustly secure as possible.

The last voting machines I worked on didn't have Internet connectivity, but they did have a freely accessible PCMCIA card slot for firmware updates.

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Voting machines are airgapped in polling places. Patches are most likely deployed from a centralized patch management server wherever they're stored in the off-season, likely also on an airgapped network.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Likely. Maybe. Should be. Best practice. Most likely.

So the vote goes into a black box, which few understand and which no one can observe, and we are to believe that no one was able to find a way around whatever good actors, policies, and procedures are in place to protect them from tampering?

Right, and they’re NOT building datacenters in order to make computer components so expensive that it prices the average joe out of personal computing and forces cloud serfdom.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-they-didnt-just-change-the

Idk about all that anymore. At least my state uses paper ballots.