this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
656 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85571 readers
3670 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vince@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago (17 children)

They could start manufacturing ram? Or fund startups trying to make ram?

Seriously is there no way to get out of having only 2-3 chip and memory makers?

[–] Womble@piefed.world 138 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You cant just "fund a startup trying to make ram". Chip fabrication is probably the most difficult and capital intensive production process there is. What manufacturing more ram looks like is investing tens of billions of real money (not the you give us stock we let you use our GPU deals the AI companies have been doing) and then waiting 5-10 years before the fab you funded starts to make chips, and hope prices are still high by then.

That's why the existing manufactures are slow to scale up, they arent sure that the current spike in demand will still be there by the time their scaling up increases production.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

If only there was something like a chip act that the government could have provided that capital….

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but also cartel behavior. Those same 3 manufacturers have been found guilty of it in the past, and it wouldn't surprise me one bit if they were fixing prices again now. See this video by Gamers Nexus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of all companies, though, Microsoft is one of the few who could easily afford to sink a few billion into starting in-house chip production.

And even if they only ever produce chips for their own products, they'll still probably come out ahead in the long run, because of all the money they'll save on not paying inflated prices for others' chips to use in Microsoft hardware.

That 'in the long run' part is the problem, though. Corps can never see beyond the next quarterly earnings report. An investment that will take years to pay off ... that's just out of the question.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, no. There is no fast way to spin up fabs for this stuff. A lot of lithography equipment for the top tier stuff is made by 1 supplier, stocking a shitload of fabs with the right gear just isn’t something they can do.

IMHO, the fastest way out of this mess would be for governments to regulate how supply is spilt between consumer and enterprise products.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A lot of lithography equipment for the top tier stuff is made by 1 supplier

So maybe invest in that and become another top-tier supplier of lithography equipment?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Or just build hardware that's easier to make

I would gladly go back to 2012-era hardware if it meant I could afford it and people maintained software for it

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

But you can!

Just buy up used stuff, computers nowadays are very resilient.

I have a 6 gen intel Linux, works like a charm., and a 8 gen for "gaming n stuff" (windoze), I even got my hands on a recent laptop for 100€...

No need to buy that latest stuff, IMO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That still might take 10y because lithography printers aren’t cheap, their location isn’t cheap, and so much more. Once you watch an Intel, TSMC, or Texas Instru… chip factory tour.

Wait, why doesn’t Texas Instrument cash in or did they offshore their production too?

[–] vrek@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago

Fun fact...the chip maker and the calculator company are completely seperate. Don't really know why it's fun but well it is a fact.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They're already selling silicone designed twenty years ago at absurd markup, so Texas Instruments has no need to jeopardize that with the AI fad.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're going to start up an entire RAM company to fill a temporary shortage?

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, then they'll be shortage resistant

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can't really work the way to want it to.

You have let's say Samsung who can make money selling a chip as long as the price > $50. And historically the price of the chip has averaged $100.

But the demand is crazy and they can't keep up and the price of the chip is $500. They are making money hand over fist but let's say they feel a moral obligation (hahahahaha) to lower the price by increasing capacity.

So they invest a billion dollars to increase capacity. Now that's a huge cost that reduces their margin on all chips. Between loans and maintenance, now they have to sell a chip for $90 to break even. But that's fine because they are making $410 per chip instead of $50!

Except now you fix the supply issue and demand falls to normal. You've just cut your profit from $50 to $10. You have to sell 5x the volume to make the money you were making!

Except it's even worse, because now you have all these extra chips you're building and nowhere to put them. Supply exceeds demand, pushing prices lower so instead of $100, they are selling for $80. Now Samsung loses $10 on every chip and they go bankrupt trying to pay back a billion in loans.

So it's not really in their interest to build capacity to meet a temporary demand. Unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

You don't need to be "shortage resistant" when there's no shortage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The “demand” is in the future. It may never be realized. There’s no money in starting a chip fab when there’s only a manufactured shortage. The chip companies aren’t adding capacity because they don’t need it.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh ... even with the popping of the AI bubble, the long-term future is bright for any new chip manufacturer. The world is only becoming more and more electronic, with more and more gadgets needing advanced chips. When the AI bubble goes boom, demand may temporarily drop, but in the long term demand will rise overall.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Plus it's not like any of the major companies have been earning consumer appreciation. If a new company started today and offered similar price fora buck less than everyone else I'd buy just for the pleasure of saying I didn't buy Nvidia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, we should probably just have a state owned and ran chip fab company. If the US is serious about security and/or innovation, that's what needs to happen. There's no way it's going to happen though sadly, but that's what should be done. >

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Why state owned, when they can have privately owned and just funnel your tax money right into it, then retire to take up cushy "consultancy" positions on the board?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 79 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that time Samsung wouldn't sell ram to Samsung because they needed to compete with the demand from Samsung.

[–] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] wanderinglurk@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

The semiconductor/memory chip production side wouldn't sell the chips to the consumer electronics side, because it's more profitable to sell and feed to the genAI side of the business.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 21 points 1 week ago

Samsung is a Korean jaebeol. It's a massive conglomerate all owned by the one family, but each department operates very independently and is incentivised largely to maximise its own profit independent of the rest of the conglomerate.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Episode 7893 of corporations artificially creating problems to make profit by selling the solution. Just to then fail at solving the problem of their own creation.

Brilliant economic system. You can marvel at its ingenuity and just get lost in it.

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They aren’t artificially creating this problem, they are inadvertently creating this problem.

AI companies need RAM and other compute components to feed the AI beast which drives up demand, and cost but reduces supply for everyone, including their Xbox and Surface divisions.

Given their enterprise divisions make vastly more money than their consumer divisions, nothing will change.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem is artificial, because 95% of all this 'AI' is useless, pointless, and a massive waste of resources. Nobody asked for it, and practically nobody is using it.

Even in cases where a chatbot is helpful, a small, local model is more than enough. Not a single soul needs a 50T parameter model for anything. Nobody on the planet uses AI image enhancement or item removal.

Almost all of this shit is purely made to inflate the bubble, and serves no other purpose. All the while ruining many other industries, people's hobbies, ease of finding factual information online, etc.

The problem is artificial, because it was created pretty much deliberately, for no particular reason other than profit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Asha Sharma standing on the glass cliff.

She and Xbox will be gone inside of two years.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I haven’t bought an XBox since the 360 because it was such a vapid upgrade path.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dvixen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Asha was absolutely put in place to be glass cliffed.

Not sure Xbox will be gone any time soon, but once Asha has taken all the blame they'll get back to the same old BS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

"We're going to crash in to that orphanage! AHHH!"

"Then brake..."

"OH THE HUMANITY!?!"

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You can stop pulling the lever at any time. All that happens is modern society unravels as we enter the financial equivalent of a thermonuclear bomb going off. The same will happen but slightly worse if you keep holding the lever.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm all for shitting on Microslop, but let's not pretend they're solely responsible for the memory pricing crisis.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

let’s not pretend they’re solely responsible for the memory pricing crisis.

Nobody is claiming that. Did you even read the literal first sentence of the article?

the memory pricing crisis that its own AI ambitions are helping cause

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The headline is claiming that. You can't just lie and then walk it back once someone clicks. There is a limit to how much inaccuracy you can put into a headline to simplify it, and this is definitely past it. To save one word they make it this wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Soley? No. Huge part of it? Absolutely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

Fuck Microsoft with an umbrella, but in this case it's not just only Microsoft, there are a lot more and bigger players on this shit dish

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I went to my thoughts store and they were all out of thoughts. The prayer store? Out of business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] liking625@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If there was a decent governement behind they would have never left this reaching the point where the consumer market is left with nothing

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They're still planning on making a new Xbox? Sometimes I forget there's an Xbox console anymore.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They could just cancel all yet to be manufactured orders for starters...

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Just... lemme help folks out with the corpo speak here.

'leading-end'

Ok now watch this ->

'lead-ending'

mind explosion gif

load more comments
view more: next ›