this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
133 points (84.5% liked)

People Twitter

10058 readers
1187 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago

My take is that SP is a show about how everyone is capable of being hypocritical, petty and inflammatory. It touches on uncomfortable subjects because those are what bring people to show the aforementioned traits.

I don't think "dark humor" is the point, it's just there to keep the viewer engaged so they can see social issues from another angle and reconsider their views.

[–] JFLennson@feddit.org 16 points 10 hours ago

Somebody's got some sand in their vagina.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago

Too many people seem to think that portraying something is the same thing as supporting it, completely missing the point of satire. They lack the media literacy to realize that critiques can be conveyed through characters and stories in a nuanced way.

South Park parodies a lot of things, sometimes by showing something simply as what it is. Some characters are meant to be disliked. For example, when Cartman is a douchebag, but he's not meant to be a "good guy" to model yourself after. He's a caricature of a self-centered bigot, and in being that, is used to lampoon others like him.

The show has had some bad takes. The whole "ManBearPig" scenario comes to mind. Thankfully, the creators came around to admitting they were very, very wrong in that case. In my opinion, such bad episodes are rare, with most providing cultural commentary in a way that turns them into time capsules reflecting various moments in our world.

With that said, it's okay to not like it. Not every show is going to appeal to everybody, especially a show that makes it a point to poke fun at almost everyone. Though one group they don't make fun of is disabled people - they show disabled characters as normal people, getting into their own hijinks the way all the other kids do. Instead, the creators make fun of those who'd rather infantilize disabled people and hide them away, like way back when Timmy was introduced and was in a band. Le Petite Tourette explained Tourette's Syndrome honestly, with Cartman's abuse of the situation being standard Cartman behavior (that backfired on him beautifully.)

Shutting people out who see the nuance is a naive take. I wouldn't go out of my way to sell the show to such people, but if they can't see that the show has far more hits than misses, well, they're the ones missing out.

[–] Harelipsteve@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Either everything is funny or nothing is

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

How dare you like something I don't like?

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago

Dark humour aside, what the aim really is, is to hold up a mirror to issues the mass populous takes for granted, after slow drip erosion of societally accepted rights. It's a fight back against the mass media and thier ilk, beating you about the head with "these people are bad because...." so you go along with hunting them down, but really they've found a convenient way to remove YOUR rights, or distract you into not noticing something egregious they've done. We become desensitised to things, and south park rips that bandage off fast and painfully, by design. They show you the things you have become desensitised to, in massively parodied, over the top, over exaggerated version, so you see through your former brain washing or desensitisation. If you don't pay attention, you don't notice the messages always pointing out how egregious the thing actually is. I would suggest, if you have that opinion, you've never actually really watched south park.

And really none of us should talk from a bias, we should employ critical thinking and inform ourselves fully, before making definitive statements. So, go watch... I'll bet you change your mind.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 62 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"if someone disagrees im muting them" is the cry of someone i dont need to hear anything from

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

The entitled American (and I’m an American myself). My country has fostered mentalities and behaviors that I can’t stand. We act like the planet owes us everything. Obviously not everyone is like this, but America has a unique brand of entitlement that I’ve witnessed pour out of both right-wingers ans even the most leftist people. I witnessed a local well-known white pro-Palestine activist refuse to participate in a march for the black community because police were present. They didn’t stop to think “this is lead by and represents them—I should stay to support their actions.”

No one is safe from being an entitled asshole and it’s healthy to have a reality check sometimes. Not everything is about America.

[–] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

Oh damn I'm not one to defend the USA, but in this case I have to say, it's not just you. I feel we absolutely live in the age of entitlement, as in, that is the biggest problem right now, and might even destroy us.

You have these far right movements going on everywhere, and they literally consist of people who, when presented with scientific facts, insist that they are entitled to have their opinion that says otherwise. And politically correct people can feel pushed to agree that, yes, they are entitled to their opinion.

But while that whole group is either that entitlement or selective ignorance, it absolutely exists on the left, too, like you said. I've run into LGBT+? folks that go "it's not your time to talk, it's your time to listen" in a comment thread. I'll gladly talk WITH people in a respectful way, but if you just want to talk AT me... No, you're not entitled to me being an audience for some kinda narcissist savior fantasy.

The red pill bugs, who feel entitled to women's bodies. The female counterparts, who feel entitled to men paying for everything. The parents who feel entitled to everybody accomodating their kids. The customers who feel entitled to mistreat service workers. The people who say "I deserve" where others say "I earned".

Entitlement, man. Work on not being entitled, and you're already a saint among sinners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 45 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It’s fine if OOP hates South Park. It’s a divisive show. However, dark humor is indeed a valuable thing. Yes, sometimes assholes call sexism, racism, homophobia (etc) “dark humor” in an attempt to excuse what they know is wrong, but that doesn’t mean that the concept of dark humor is flawed.

Dark humor is often used to mock and/or point out hypocrisy. Sometimes it deliberately makes us uncomfortable. We should always reflect on ourselves and our culture as a whole. That’s a vital part of becoming a better person.

If OOP chose to “mute” me for expressing that opinion, I don’t think I’d be missing much.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 19 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The inherent problem with any satire labeled as "dark" is that people generally lack the ability to determine it as a satirical work of art.

In general I think it's a valuable form of art. However, if you don't hammer the point that you are actively mocking your target of satire and disavow the audience who are mistakenly attracted to it, then I think it can do more harm than good.

I think this is where I am on the fence with it when it comes to some comedians who claim they are engaging in dark works of satire, but are comfortable with having a large portion of their audience being right winged chuds who don't understand its satire.

This transgresses pretty much all works of satire. A good example being the 40k franchise, which started out as a satirical commentary against fascism, specifically against Thatcherism. Eventually they had a large contingency of people who are unironically fans of the Empire. Though they have recently taken steps to mitigate this, they did spend decades making money from these types of people.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

The only reason I know about 40k is MUTHA FUCKIN BOLT THROWER !!!! Best metal band ever

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The unfortunate result of this "requirement" for creators to clarify their position such that everyone consuming the work understands that it's satire, is the complete and utter loss of subtlety. Because now you're just dumbing down your work to the level of the slowest kid in the classroom who, as the last decade has proven, is in fact very slow indeed. It would be one thing if bigots were known for their intellect and media comprehension skills, but alas...

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Call me a brunch liberal or whatever but this whole mindset makes media boring. It's for people who think of art as propaganda more than self-expression.

Don't dumb shit down for literal Nazis. Honestly I might go ahead and say all it does is give them more things to point to to say "WOKE MEDIA IS BAD." Because stuff written like this really does blow.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, one of the running gags in the show is literally just "this guy is every stereotype of a Chinese person" and the only real joke is that it sounds like he is saying "shitty" when he's saying "city."

They can do better. They have done better. But there is still hella uncomfortable bullshit like that in the show.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 3 points 8 hours ago

FWIW, he's canonically a white guy portraying a racist Chinese stereotype. I never figured out what to make of that. It doesn't exactly make it funnier or inherently more satirical. But it is a thing.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 100 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I think the only unifying theme to South Park is that everything can be funny.

I would say that generally the characters with the least power are treated in the most sympathetic way, though, and those with the most power are painted with the worst brush.

They do have a sense of good and evil, but also acknowledge that evil is often given free reign because good people have a hard time organizing and gaining consensus as to what needs to be done about it.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think some of the episodes have put light on things that need it. Scientology spring to mind.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 16 hours ago

Tourette Syndrome is another one.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The one thing they do is skewer pomp and pretension. They are the guys at a dinner party who say "everybody poops so why can't we talk about it?" Or will ask the minister about his sex life if he asks about their relationship to God.

It can be genuinely stupid and annoying sometimes because it's a blunt instrument. They assume that everything is fine and that anyone passionate about a cause is a misguided idiot.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, this.

No one is above reproach and they stay on the pulse.

However, I find the humor dated. It’s like if Jim Carrey did 30 sequels to Ace Ventura.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 21 hours ago

The Ace Ventura one is particularly apt because the one group they still punched down on a lot was trans people...

[–] Rumo161@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago

Why are people acting like this is not a Screenshot from twitter and as if SwissArmyKazoo personaly wrote that post???

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Nice try Trump Administration

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok, so when trying to explain it. You will mute me.. Great start of the convo ;-)

[–] iltg@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

dark humor is not making fun of marginalized people, I'd call that bullying instead. you can make trans dark humor without being transphobic (e.g. joking around waiting lists), so answering transphobic complaints with "its dark humor" is not really good faith arguing

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Gotta love those people.

“Anyone trying to use the obvious rational argument will be blocked!”

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

ITT:

(It's okay to like a show. Cartman's voice just gives me a headache, you guys.)

[–] replicat@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you have a high res version of this?

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 27 points 1 day ago

Oh no, please don't mute me, you mirthless twat.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

Humour of color

Ftfy

load more comments
view more: next ›