We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
All you actually need to make a diamond is extremely high pressure and carbon, which are both in relative abundance below the Earth's surface.
So compared to other gemstones that require specific multi-elememt minerals to form, on top of any other conditions, diamonds being the most common makes complete sense.
Which makes DeBeer's whole campaign of artificial scarcity only that much worse.
Edit: Not Dabares haha
Yep. And basicly all coloured jems are saphires
Sapphires are awesome and easy to produce
Really? The jewler and goldsmith told me opposite
Not sure from jeweler perspective, they might be hard to put into jewelry.
But synthetic sapphire is relatively easy to produce, enough that it's used for watch faces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire#/media/File:Sapphire_boule,_Kyropoulos_method.jpg
I'm wearing a watch with a sapphire lens right now! From what I understand, the tradeoff between different watch faces are how easy/hard they are to scratch vs shatter, with sapphire being the most scratch proof and a plastic polymer (I don't remember which) being the most shatter resistant.
They also use them in high-end watches as tiny bearings for the movements IIRC
Correct, if a watch says 17 or 21 jewels that's what they're referring to. Although unlike the lens they're typically a reddish color.
*The red is from them being ruby not sapphire.
Surely all screens should be sapphire then?
They are very hard to scratch, but also probably easier to crack. I'd hate to drop a phone with a sapphire screen.
Sapphire is extremely hard, and thus extremely easy to crack.
Apple used to do that
Remember all the smashed iphones?
Rubies and sapphires are both the same mineral with different impurities but this is very wrong. Tourmaline, garnet, spinel, emerald, topaz, beryl, ...?
I was going to point out that some of the stones you mentioned are semiprecious stones but it turns out that "gemstone" actually includes precious and semiprecious stones. Also, the distinction between the two is arbitrary and mostly based on how expensive they were in the Copper Age. TIL.
Beryl and emerald are also (basically) the same thing. Just different impurities giving a different color.
No, sapphires are any color corundum besides red. Red corundum is called ruby. The molecular formula of corundum is Al~2~O~3~
If it's not corundum, it's not a sapphire. Topaz isn't a sapphire. Emerald isn't a sapphire. There are yellow sapphires and green sapphires, but not every yellow or green gemstone is a sapphire.
Not exactly.
Saphirs are Corundum of any colors exept red, because red Corundum are rubies.
So yeah, almost all Zelda games rubies are in fact saphirs.
Emeralds are Beryls, like aquamarines.
Feel like this is common knowledge by now right? Diamonds are scarce because DeBeers controls the supply to keep prices high. Not because they're geologically rare
Well, yes, but also no. Even without DeBeers fuckery, they'd still be worth more than other gems. Diamonds are incredibly common, but large, high quality diamonds are both rare and difficult to process without damaging. Diamonds are brittle as fuck.
The analogy I use is imagine if the latest home decor trend was perfectly preserved tree stumps. Everything intact, from the tiniest root all the way to the trunk. Super common, yeah, but it would be enormously expensive to have done.
Ad ad campaigns convincing women love is about a massively overpriced chip of stone.
Every time I see people in the west mock Japan for being bamboozled by KFC into accepting chicken as part of Christmas tradition, I think of this.
Turns out people in general are just easily manipulated creatures of habit and custom.
Why would americans mock japanese for eating chicken on a holiday? We do the same with turkey on thanksgiving which isn’t much different than kfc other than who made it. Everyone on this planet is brainwashed a bit by their ancestors.
It's not chicken, it's KFC specifically. That's usually the source of derision. Not to say I agree with it (let people have their little things, even if it's corpo hell paste that they got it from)
Eating eggs and bacon for breakfast, breakfast cereals, milk, orange juice, were all the result of ad campaigns.
People used to eat dinner leftovers for breakfast.
The problem is that jewelry grade diamonds are still rare, even without DeBeers fucking with the supply.
Diamonds are super common, but they're mostly small and garbage quality (relatively).
And where can this sentiment be found?
Something that often gets lost here is high quality gemstones are still rare by comparison. Not saying it excuses their stupid prices, but that we use diamonds to coat sawblades because it is so abundant, yet so much is shit quality.
Large enough to set in jewelry, with few enough imperfections to convince a buyer, and a skilled jeweler with years of practice cutting it, is still rare and worth something. Sure debeers did a "fuck you i control the supply" and we're still falling for part of that scam, but it doesn't mean gemstones are suddenly commonplace and worth $10.
Maybe we should embrace imperfection as a character of the gem.
Wait, no, then they use it as distinction to cheap artifical diamonds.
We should stop using them as stupid vanity items and working people to death to drag them out of the ground.
They started marketing things like "chocolate diamonds" that are imperfect
Maybe we should stop assigning fake value to a useless chip of rock.
They are common enough for them to be cheap especially with man made ones.
Diamond is expensive because it absorbed the miner and slave's blood. Gotta let it marinated for 24 hours.
Seems to be a lack of mineralogists here.
Gemstone is a market term. There is no division scientifically between a gem and a mineral.
Minerals form in specific geological settings as a result of temperature, pressure, and the composition of the materials reacting. On the surface of the Earth, we tend to mostly have low temperatures and low pressures. Most minerals are made of only 8 elements, one of which is carbon.
“Gemstone quality” is based on whether or not a mineral can be attractive when faceted. Most minerals do not pass this aesthetic.
To say that a mineral is common or rare is extremely dependent on context. Garnet, for instance, could be the gem that is targeted, or could be waste material that is an annoyance. Most diamond mines throw away massive amounts of garnet.
So, the statement in the title needs a lot of caveats.
Yeah diamonds are actually really garbage with a really good PR campaign, artificial scarcity, and PR. I remember some years back when they were really pushing "chocolate diamonds." They were just brown diamonds that they couldn't get rid of otherwise. I don't know if it worked, but I don't think so.
Garbage? They're pretty fucking hard. That's a useful property
Great for drill bits and my knife sharpener
Please tell me you use ceramic for the knife sharpner 90% of the time?!?
Haha I have 6K and 1K stone, then diamond 400 for rough edges and 150 for leveling the stone. Appreciate the concern though, the state of some people's knifes makes me uneasy
Big diamonds are actually rare. Still inflated.
I found out more about alexandrite, and now I want it
Same! I want my wedding ring to be that now. It looks so beautiful and it changes color is so fun thing.
