this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
1287 points (98.3% liked)

cats

28612 readers
963 users here now

Typical internet cats. Videos, pics, memes, and discussion welcome!

Rule 1) Be kind

Rule 2) Follow the lemmy.world rules

other cat communities

midwest.social cats

cats with jobs

birds, some cats

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A ring is cheaper than vet bills.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, I’d agree. I have 3, and they’re little love bugs. But man, the vet bills can be a hard pill.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Normalize not buying useless $2000 USD pieces of junk that starved children in Congo had to dig with bare hands, just to marry your soul mate.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

❌ proposing by giving the person a ring

❌ proposing by giving the person a pet

✅ proposing to be the person's pet

:3 (lore accurate :3 users)

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't let your dreams be dreams.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Especially as diamond rings are costly to purchase, but have relatively low resale value.

Buying her a diamond ring only shows you have money to burn.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I bought my wife's engagement and wedding ring at a pawn shop. Fuck the superstitious bullshit. Probably saved $5k

[–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Buy resold maybe?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 33 points 2 days ago

That is going to be one very very rough pet passing in 1-2 decades

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 194 points 3 days ago (20 children)

the jewelry is the least important thing about being married.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 63 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I think my spouse and I spent... $80 total on our rings. Seemed like a waste of money to both of us.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 79 points 2 days ago (7 children)

22 years of marriage here. Never bought, given, or worn a diamond in my life.

Marriage rings are a marketing campaign created to sell you a piece of carbon that is so "rare" they put them on $12 drill bit sets.

Yep. Yep. Different quality stones. Gotcha. Interested in buying a bridge by chance?

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Carbon is the 4th most abundant element in the galaxy. Silicon is twice as rare, so maybe spend 6 month’s salary on a quartz ring instead? Either that, or save up for a down payment on a house. Nah, who needs a place to live when you can have a hunk of mineral, right?

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago

If I’m spending 6 months salary on silicon, it better at least run Doom.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would it matter if you can't afford jewelry to get married? If this were at a time where the husband is expected to be the sole earner, that could be a problem. But this is 2026. He's working, she's working, and getting married will not change that.

If anything, his and her individual financial burden will decrease by getting married by combining their finances and sharing bills, if they aren't spending stupid money on diamond rings, big weddings, exotic honeymoons, etc. They'll share a home, utilities, online subscriptions, etc. That will save them both money. If they can afford to live individually without luxuries, they can more easily afford to live together, maybe with the occasional luxury.

Stupid take.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 12 points 2 days ago

Thank you.

Marriage is simultaneously promoted because it saves money due to sharing expenses and often (but not always) tax benefits, but also people don't have enough money to get married. Wut?

The ring and wedding itself might be expensive, but they are also optional.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At first glance I honestly thought she looked horrified because he was interrupting her on the toilet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 90 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Smart. Easier to say 'no' to a shiny rock, hard to say it to a kitten.

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She could say no, but she won't. Because of the implication.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 days ago

"We both know that this cat only lives if you say yes"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That he can't afford it is a stupid assumption imo, this looks like a deliberate choice. Being responsible for raising and taking care of a kitten together is a much bigger commitment than wearing a ring.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mnfalconia_a2gc@retrolemmy.com 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A little data point on the whole marriage thing... I and my life partner have been together for 20 y, will be 21 in September. We never got married and we don't have any rings. I keep hearing that a lot of marriages these days don't last this long.

We do informally call each other "my wife", but still, no formal marriage was ever done.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

The only reason marriages lasted longer back in the day was because women were essentially indirectly forced to be with men. The whole bank account thing in the US is a really good example of how screwed women were. There were a lot of very long marriages that were deeply unhappy.

Nowadays, women get at least some amount of freedom to choose their partners and hundreds/thousands of years of men not having to actually be good people has meant that many of us are lonely and blame the women for having some standards. Good communication and mutual respect go a long way and those are the marriages that last these days.

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

* my partner and I

[–] ravelin@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Too bad they have to divorce when the cat dies.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just put the cat in a box with a radioactive substances. Scroedinger's marriage.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus 63 points 3 days ago (5 children)

noo but they didn't pay a significant amount of money to the diamond industry!!

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 44 points 3 days ago

Won't anyone think of the slave owners?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I hate these made up headlines.

[–] Pickleideas@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Guarantee you that cat will cost more in the first year than a ring from a fancy jewelry store

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 43 points 3 days ago

Cost? Yes.

But WORTH! Also YES!!! 🐈

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (9 children)

You severely underestimate the cost of jewelry. And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word "wedding" in front of it.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›