this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
158 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85080 readers
3945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I will never EVER give an AI agency over any of my personal accounts.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 43 minutes ago

You are not the target audience.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 47 minutes ago

Well, Microsoft, if you want that, put more cocaine in it.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

Ah yes, Cortana and Copilot both suck, but surely third time's the charm. And when Scout is, inevitably, unpopular as well? We'll see what they call number four.

You forgot clippy, but everyone forgets about clippy unless it's in this exact context. Or it's Norfolk wizard game.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

You forgot they called it Bing in the middle too

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

Is there any fundamental diffidence between Copilot and Scout, or is it just a straight up rebranding?

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Cortana was actually really good on Windows Phone but they dumbed it down and added all sort of crap to it by the time it was integrated onto the desktop. They could've doubled down on whatads it good but nope.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Did they try making it good?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 1 points 12 minutes ago

That's the beauty of it (from their viewpoint), they don't have to make it good, just unavoidable.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

yes, good at self-destructing.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

do you really wanna be admitting that addiction is your goal?

A $6 Million Jury Verdict Ruled Social Media Is Addictive.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/anishasircar/2026/03/30/a-6-million-jury-verdict-ruled-social-media-is-addictive-now-what/

[–] uninvitedguest@piefed.ca 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That kind of fine is a pittance.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

true. but this one wasn't a class action, either.. just one plaintiff.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

adding new "features"

look inside

enshittification

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

looks inside" its all AI, nothing but AI"

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

addictive? hahahahah. Poor Microsoft. Everything started going wrong for them when they got rid of Clippy.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

its like trying to make people like fly agaric.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 9 points 3 hours ago

Legitimately most modern games or all of social media.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Duh. I wouldn't have called it "addiction", but dependency was clearly the goal, otherwise they wouldn't take away classical search.

I thought that was obvious from the start.

Uhh yeah thats the long term profit concept of LLMs, force them onto people for free until they cant live without them, then jack up the price. Its been pretty obvious...

[–] Qzr@programming.dev 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

At least they're honest (internally) about their intentions. Obviously this is also the goal of the other big AI foundries; it either already is or it will be in the future.

Luckily Microsoft is famously bad at this, but Google and perhaps OpenAI will be more successful. We're still in the subsidized honeymoon phase, but this window is closing with the increasing pressure to return profit.

As a skeptic, I'm not worried about myself, but I'm scared for the people who will get addicted and then ruined by full prices or devastated when their mind drug is taken away again.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

seems like google and OPENAI have the same problems, just as a slower decline. google trying to force gemini into all thier services. anthropoic isnt doing any better either.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Knowing Microslop, I'm not too worried. They'll either scrap the idea before implementing it or make it so shitty people won't use it. Let them try for the shits n giggles.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

NOBODY WANTS TO WORK (on loving scout) ANYMORE!!!

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Never heard of Scout or seen the logo, but that's a big swirly poo, right? I'm not crazy, am I? This feels like being punked.

It's most definitely a poo.

[–] wizzkidd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Attention economy. Gotta fight it or gotta leave it for something better.