make better shit or fuck off, Fender
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)
guitars
5776 readers
83 users here now
Welcome to /c/guitars! Let's show off our new guitar pics, ask questions about playing, theory, luthier-ship, and more!
Please bring all positive vibes to the community and leave the toxic stuff elsewhere.
Rules:
-
Treat others with respect. ALL others.
-
No spam
-
No self promotion
-
No NSFW
-
No circle jerk posts, there are other places for that silliness, and they are wonderful. Not here.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm beginning to feel that the entire idea of intellectual property is just another form of class warfare by the Epstein class against the rest of us.
I wonder what the Stradivari family would have to say about that?
For those that don't know, violins, violas, cellos, and bass didn't have that shape until Stradivari came up with it. Prior to that, they looked a bit more like acoustic guitars.
Fender's argument here would wipe out every single modern violin, viola, cello, and bass manufacturer.
The only real difference I can see is that the shape of a violin, etc., changes how it sounds. I'm entirely uncertain how that plays out in the electric guitar world.
Translation: Fender thinks we’re stupid
I'd smash my Fender in response, but, I can't afford to Cobain shit.
Same, but I can scrape the Fender stickers off my guitar case 😤
I will never buy another fender again.
“Blah blah blah fuck you we want money” is all I read. I hope they choke on it. It’s rich that they talk about innovation when they are the Harley Davidson of guitars, coasting on nostalgia for decades.
Harley Davidson copyrighted the sound of their shitty motors. This is what happens to a brand being milked with zero innovation or R&D.
This made me feel 0% better about the situation.
Fender had an iconic name on the headstock that people did care about and now they're losing that as they grasp for more control of body shape which is already public domain in the US 🤯
The fact that Fender already lost an attempt to secure IP rights in US court is what makes this whole thing so crazy. And my understanding is that the German and EU courts are such that the default summary judgement isn't even binding anywhere else. I have to assume that a company like Fender would retain a competent law firm. So who decided this was going to be a profitable course of action? And who is going to prove to be so horribly wrong about how it will turn out?
Anything Fender did expired into the public domain decades ago. They are trying to secure a copyright, which lasts 70 years, for a SHAPE.
I'm guessing that competent lawyers are good at convincing dumb fuck MBA's to spend shit tons of money on billable hours
It would seem saner to me if the MBAs pushed for the legal action and the lawyers determined they can't lose their licenses over this. And I would be astounded if FMIC is paying by the hour and not keeping a firm on retainer.
Your interpretation of these kind of things seems based on actual knowledge but I'm pretty good at pulling things out of my asshole
Specific things, or just random things? There are some things I've lost that I'd love to replace.
Maybe they think of it as free marketing. How did Kanye stay in the news for as long as he did? Being the absolute worst person he could muster up.
Maybe they know damn well this isn’t gonna go anywhere, but holy shit are people gonna talk about it.
(Source: my tinfoil hat, which doesn’t get enough credit for it’s stylish design)