this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
64 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

15834 readers
440 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The bill allows New York City to require the speed governor for the cars of traffic scofflaws who incur school zone speed camera violations 16 times or more in 12 months. The city would create and run the pilot program.

What? Why do they have licenses still?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

ons 16 times or more in 12 month

SHOULD BE IN FUCKING JAIL. 12 x in 12 months should be losing their fucking license for years.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Camera-based violations are typically civil instead of criminal. AKA pay fines instead of getting points on your license or facing jail time.

If you want the jet-black cynical take, this is because repeat offenders are better for the municipal budget than turning them into non-drivers.

A more measured take is that it's very hard to prove who was driving just based on these cameras, so while the registered owner can be civilly responsible for what their vehicle did, it's a bigger challenge and expense to prove that they're criminally responsible.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In Australia we have a point system, each driving offence (whether caught by a cop or a robot) deducts points, reach zero points and you lose your driver's licence

People on a handful of points become very careful

Best of all money won't save you

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Best of all money won't save you

that is NOT true, get a business owned car, they pay a fine only, no points.

Fine based system like Australias are designed to punish poor people, if not we'd be using the Finnish system that's linked to your earnings.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

roll the dice, who knows, maybe with dozens of incidents of cutting through the school zone they'll never hit some kid. why not.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The final legislation includes carve-outs for several classes of drivers. Vehicles owned and operated by the state, city, public agencies or political subdivisions are exempt

I'm fine with police, fire and ambulance not being covered by the law. But there are also cars for various public officials, and I think those should be covered.

joining all vehicles regulated by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission.

Uh, what? No. Taxis are already dangerous enough!

Commercial vehicles that are regularly used by two or more drivers are also exempt.

No, it should be all vehicles the person has regular access to. If that inconveniences the guy's coworkers, then the guy can just live with the public shame of having zipped through school zones 16 times in a year.

drivers will also have to install the devices on all vehicles registered under their name, which would prevent the abuse of family cars or similar arrangements

No it doesn't. The governors should be installed on all cars in a household, not just one person's name.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean I hear you, but I'll take the win if this basically just targets luxury coupe drivers.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, finally going after the cops, right?

... right?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If we could get cops to stop murdering people, maybe they'd have more time to enforce the laws that are on the books for shit like this.

[–] scibra122@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago

After 16 times specifically in a school zone in a 12 month period? Surely this is so watered down it affects nobod-

Streetsblog reported that Staten Island cop James Giovansanti notched 547 speed-camera and red-light violations since 2022

Insanity

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are some crazy drivers that love to speed by my place every night, all night. Loud ones. Popcorn makers. I’m considering spike strips and hoping they hit a tree.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Youth love the roundabout near me for turning tyres into smoke, then they speed down the residential street.

We had a break for several months when one wrapped his dad's SS Commodore around a front yard tree on the inside of the first turn

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They grow out of that sort of bad behaviour

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Most do, then they're replaced by the next cohort of young men with dad's muscle car