this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
65 points (90.1% liked)

politics

30954 readers
1914 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Exactly, she can't even beat a child rapist in an election.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 53 points 3 months ago (9 children)

If she wanted to run, she should be out there fighting facism. I'm not interested in voting for someone who's just letting all this shit happen.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’ve only seen her when she wanted to sell her book on speed-running losing an election.

She could be on TV and podcasts, 24/7 presenting the alternative and pointing out all the ways Trump is breaking the law and conning the country.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago

Oh I'm sure she'll soon be speaking at some big universities (for money) and she'll probably also be at a few DNC events...maybe; possibly; ever.

[–] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

Why would a centrist do that though?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Kamala Harris wants Kamala Harris to run

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

If she thinks running again is going to go well, she'd delusional.

So yes, Kamala Harris wants Kamala Harris to run.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 50 points 3 months ago (7 children)

The fact that there's even a whiff of Kamala running again is great evidence that we are so fucked and will continue to be so fucked.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

To be fair, Hillary Clinton floated running again in 2020 and she never even launched that campaign. I don't think there's much intent behind this. I suppose it makes these former candidates feel special, or satiates some craving for attention :P

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who Wants Kamala Harris to Run?

Netanyahu.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He's fine with any person who would be capable of being elected - US Government policy is to kiss Israel's ass regardless of which party is in charge. But a Republican would always be preferable to him.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 28 points 3 months ago

I want a real progressive to run is the main problem.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I want her to run... Far far away from here.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

"Pokemon GO... The fuck away!"

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

All night and day, even though she couldn't get away.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Just stop already.

[–] ytsedude@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

neoliberal, centrist Democrats.

But I guess I spelled Republican again.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

Harris even in discussion is proof that the US has degraded to a one party government.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

why not run a milquetoast loser again???

[–] CompGenius@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

She knows she wouldn't win. Just wants to fundraise, lose and sell another book.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

Absolutely not. No more typical status quo corporate liberals.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

They needed someone out there on day 1 after the election to be the face and the presence of the DNC as a clear personality for the next run. Instead it’s likely you will get someone in the last five minutes.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

This bitch lost the presidency to the worst piece of shit on the face of the planet. Why in the fuck does she think she has any chance trying to run again?

load more comments
view more: next ›