this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
859 points (93.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3301 readers
415 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 169 points 2 weeks ago (41 children)

The Republicans have demonstrated that no, these things do not take time.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 112 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I asked for a gender inclusive restroom, was gaslighted those things take time. I then emailed CEO cc’ed chair of board of directors. It was converted in 2 days.

It was never about time, it’s about agency

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, it takes time for us peons but the dictators can do anything they please.

[–] Lon3star@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Add long as you brazenly break rules and laws, and your controlling party willingly does nothing about it

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 35 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Let's break some laws to make everyone better off.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No that would be terrorism put the bread down Mr valjean

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I wish that the Democrats had anybody who was willing to fight for Medicare For All the same way Republicans fought to overturn Roe v. Wade.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

They'll give Trump a golden parachute, wish him the best, then continue the ratchet effect. Neo-liberals are as much enemies of democracy as the reactionaries.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

we must move forward and heal which is why we won't push for charges or do any investigations

Just like they did with the bushes and Nixon and Reagan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 66 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Only in amurica would they sell people on the right to be fired for no reason and call it "right to work"

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Getting fired is right to work. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

The termination for any reason is at-will employment, aka "will to work". With that being said your point still stands because "right to work" is an anti union law that guarantees an employees right to refrain from being part of a union (lol). Both terms are dumb.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Power is never given, it is taken.

I see a lot of discourse around this theory that when Democrats are in power they’ll reverse everything this regime has done. Yes this is a comforting thought but it’s way too much to expect from the Democratic Party as we know it now.

The Executive branch has been given (and has taken) an extreme amount of power to the point where the balance we once knew is now nonexistent. Does anyone think for one second the next president will just forfeit those gains? What incentive is there? And as we’ve seen and continue to see, who will hold them to account?

My bet is that we’ll see a few easy ‘gimme’ reversals that are enough to enable our slide back into the complacency we so desperately crave.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Republicans turn the wheel counter-clockwise while the Democrats don’t turn it.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (49 children)

The last time Democrats had a filibuster -proof legislative trifecta it was for 3 months and they passed Obamacare. When they don't have Republicans blocking them every step of the way, they actually do work to improve things. They aren't perfect by a long shot, but Democrats are the best of two options by far.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Obamacare was the implementation of a 1989 Heritage Foundation plan to implement an individual mandated health care system.

Also by no available metric did Obamacare "improve things". Healthcare costs rose significantly above the pre-ACA trend, bankruptcy increased, and health outcomes plummeted across nearly all metrics.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (33 children)

The ACA would have passed much faster if they didn't try "working across the aisle" with the Republicans. If I remember, the original plan was to expand medicare to encompass more people who need it but negotiated to what Mitt Romney passed in his state while governor. Then the Republicans all voted against what they wanted. So the Democrats are either a paid opposition party or so absolutely naive to the dealings of Republicans and keep stepping on that rake. As well instead of making it a stepping stone they don't really talk about improving it either. Also in that time they could have enshrined abortion rights into law that is harder to overthrow than a supreme court ruling.

No matter how your parse things, the Democrats aren't good.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (48 children)

You're making the point for us. Obamacare is a 90s conservative proposal, it also completely killed the possibility of single payer healthcare for a generation. Republicans ratchet things right and then Democrats lock it in, great example you provided thank you.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

When was the last time Republicans had a 60-vote majority in the Senate? Why do you need 60 votes to fix that which didn't take 60 votes to break?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Didn't Biden undo a lot of shit that Trump has done during his first term?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Performatively he did, then reinstated most of what he dropped. Did nothing with his tax cuts for the rich, which checks out, as VP he worked directly with McConnel to muster votes to make the bush tax cuts for the rich permanent. He kept his border policies, war policies, etc. Continued to lie about the condition of the economy. Blue Fascism is a close relative of the red version

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

His repeated platform was to raise the minimum wage.

So... here we are. Ds couldn't be bothered.

BoTh of our parties should be dismantled, our "labor party" is shit, just like our "limited government" party.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is part of what just erodes the hope out of me. We all know there are periods of regression and periods of progress, but whatever damage is caused by the regression period is

1- Caused much more quickly than any progress.

2- Is usually beneficial to the ruling class, thus they have less of an incentive to fix it.

3- Might just become normalized, at which point you're just starting from square one all over again.

Like, age/identity verification. We are in a period of mass and widespread regression right now and age verification is making progress, eroding freedom and privacy on the internet. Do you think that when we enter the period of progress, the age verification systems of today will just be reverted? Fuck no. They'll stay. They'll become normal. And the fight against them will need to start from scratch, with an ever bigger amount of opposition.

I'm really jealous of the people who can maintain hope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

QUICK! DONT VOTE AND LET THE REGRESSIVE PARTY KEEP POWER! 🤣👍

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 17 points 2 weeks ago

Right-to-work is just another bullshit anti-Union policy.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I have concluded that the Established Democrats would rather that Trump or somebody like him is POTUS than to concede to the Left on anything, even on a morally highly charged subject like the mass murdering of tens of thousand of children (in Gaza) which at least for some people would make the Democrat candidate so repugnant that they couldn't bring themselves to vote for her even "to stop Trump"

Had Kamala genuinelly conceded to the Left on some things and not latched on to none other than the Cheney familly (honestly, I don't thing the Israeli subject was by itself enough to cause that loss), she could very well have won, but that faction of the Democrats would rather loose than stop cozing with the hard-right, so they lost to none other than Trump.

If what the Democrat tribalists were parroting back them about how Trump was so horrible and the Democrats needed to win to stop his policies was indeed how the Established Democrats felt, they would NEVER had risked a Trump victory by adopting a Reject The Left strategy at all levels.

All this to say that these people will never undo what Trump did to the broader society (though the parts that make them less electable - i.e. that affect their own personal upsides - I'm sure they'll undo) because they're totally fine with it, as shown by how in the last election they would rather risk a second Trump presidency to keep on going Right politically than to pivot Left in the slightest of ways.

Without a Revolution inside the Democrat Party, the US will keep on going in the same direction as these Democrats will do nothing but talkie-talkie on reversing Trump's policies and then in a few years another Trump character (or, worse, a genuinelly intelligent one) get in power again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Spanberger is part of the paid opposition party. She will never do anything to take power away from capitol, and Republicans will do everything to give more power to capitol.

load more comments
view more: next ›