Not quite, but they'll probably be a factor (obligatory here's hoping we're wrong on both counts). Israel's conduct in general (this is in no way restricted to a particular faction or part of the Israeli political spectrum) is making antisemitism more mainstream, but the West is due for a fascist takeover and it's not like fascists need much reason to go after Jews.

Scholars of fascism whose job literally is to study it: Am I a joke to you?

There is nothing more antisemitic than someone that conflates anti-zionism with antisemitism. Those who do believe that an entire race and religion are morally culpable for the actions of an evil government. That's like being racist against Germans today because of what Hitler did in the 30s and 40s.

For more perspective, throw in the Turkish genocide of the Armenians (where a British journalist first used the word "holocaust" in its modern sense-- the journalist was Winston Churchill) and the Holodomor. And to diversify more, there's Pol Pot's auto-genocide in Cambodia and the Rwanda bloodbath. Maybe also a sideshow on the Serbian aggression against everyone nearby who isn't a Serb.

We'll have to add a bunch of literal Nazi propaganda. And not as examples of vile hatred, but presented seriously as an argument to "both sides" the Holocaust.

No, silly, you have to show the side where the Jews made the Nazis feel bad for gassing them /s

No, ALL perspectives must be allowed. Unless it would otherwise make Israel look bad, in which case only the Israeli perspective is allowed. Anything else is antisemitic.

No silly, freedom of speech is only good when people say the thing that agrees with what I already believe