this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

[Moved to Piefed] Animation

1251 readers
1 users here now

This community has moved to !animation@piefed.social

Our community is a place for enthusiasts and fans to discuss all things related to animated media, cartoon news, etc.

Rules

1. Be RespectfulTreat everyone with respect. No harassment, bullying, or hate speech.

2. Stay on TopicGenerally ensure all posts and comments are relevant to the theme of animation. Leeway will of course be given for the natural flow of conversation

3. No SpamAvoid spamming the subreddit with repetitive messages, self-promotion, or off-topic links. Excessive posting or commenting to dominate conversations is not allowed.

4. Be Mindful of SpoilersEnsure spoilers are tagged correctly. See here.

5. No Linking Pirated MaterialJust to be safe, don't directly link to pirated content. General discussion is allowed within limits.

6. No PornSome shows/films feature nudity or erotica. These are usually allowed but must be tagged as NSFW.
Basically: Don't be an asshole

On Anime

While Anime is a beloved animation style with a rich history and extensive following, our focus here leans towards other forms of animation. This is due to the immense popularity of Anime in online spaces, which is amply covered by other dedicated communities.

This doesn't mean that Anime related conversation is not allowed here, only that it's not our focus. For a dedicated Anime instance, check out ani.social.

On Technical Discussion

While our primary goal is to discuss animated media, conversations about animation techniques and the process of creating animation are also welcome. Whether you're a budding animator seeking to understand more about the industry, or a seasoned professional sharing your experiences, you're welcome here.

Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me the first thing that comes to mind is Tales from Earthsea. I don't think it's excellent or anything and has plenty of problems but people act like it killed their dog. While it has its problems that have been covered extensively, I think it has a beautiful atmosphere and art.

IMO it would have been better received if it wasn't advertised as an Earthsea adaptation and was just its own thing.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We're back: a dinosaur story

Rock-a-doodle

The Pagemaster

Once upon a forest

Aladdin 2 and 3

Jetsons: The Movie

I'm probably overrating these because I saw them as a kid.

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My general personal rule is "If I'm entertained then it's good" hmrm I don't care what anybody says.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Rotten tomatoes is rotten itself. Half the professional critics there have been bought and paid for. So many movies have a critics score of 20 and an audience score of 90, or vice versa. It's just a sad place, don't go there

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What do you prefer instead?

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why do you need anyone or any site telling you what you like and what not? Just watch the movies. Be your own judge and executioner.

I have a letterboxed acc, just for tracking purposes. Most reviews on letterboxd are reddit style “funny” “jokes”, so no point in reading those either. Just go by genre, director, etc. and have fun. I do sometimes check the lists on there tho.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because there is too much shit out there to waste your time on it.

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I might have worded it clumsily.. I don't think anyone should watch ALL movies or not to look up stuff.

I think it's important to learn to choose your media without outside help and/or manipulation (ads, paid reviews etc.). I do look for reviews when it comes to video games, since I don't know many people IRL who play much.

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just don’t have time to watch them all, I’d like to whittle that list down a little bit before diving in

[–] krzschlss@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one has the time to watch all movies.

You are afraid to waste time on a movie you might find bad? How will you know if a movie is good if you never seen a bad movie?

It’s perfectly OK to watch random movies. Be adventurous, it’s art after all. If you only watch popular movies you’ll never find your niche, something that fulfills your art/entertainment needs.

[–] Leg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree with this sentiment. I'll watch literally any movie that catches my eye. If it's good, I'm happy. If it's bad, my taste develops and I'm happy. If it's really bad, I'm having a uniquely great time shitting on an awful movie. The experience is nothing but wins in my book.

It's just that time is precious, and other activities can take precedence for some. So after having wasted enough time on bad movies or series, and with this huge amount of movies some kind of prefilter makes sense (for me e.g. a rather high imdb score which I'm often agreeing with)

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago
[–] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

Reddit LMAO

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Here's the flipside of this phenomenon:

The Little Mermaid (2023)

Absolutely awful, atrocious, lazy cinema. It had a 94% on Rotten Tomatoes. When they do the whole under the sea scene, none of the sounds align with anything happening on screen. The plot was garbo. They've got a whole song dedicated to the cruelty of eating fish as if fish never eat any fish, and then that's still not as bad as the fucking "scuttlebutt" song.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait, really? I thought it was pretty universally hated. I wonder if critics gave it good scores for fear of being lumped in with the idiots who were pissed with Ariel being played by a black woman.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The 94% is an "audience score". The only way I can rationalize it is they used a bot network, but I've got no proof. Maybe just a bunch of parents who took their kids rated it highly? 10,000 of them.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ever considered you weren't the target demographic?

I bet tons of little kids loved the movie. It became like a frozen to them.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let me stop you right there, 10,000 children ages 5-11 did NOT write a Rotten Tomatoes review.

[–] VARXBLE@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, of course not lol. It was actually 20,000 children ages 5-11, because each review was written by two kids in a big coat to get past the bot filters.

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills regarding The Fifth Element for this exact same phenomena. I watched it for the first time a few years back and it...just isn't good? But people absolutely rave about it. I don't know if I'm missing something or if people are just too blinded by nostalgia glasses. But the CGI doesn't hold up, I found all the characters annoying, and the plot felt really basic and random. Someone's probably mailing me anthrax now just for saying this.

[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Counterpoint, nobody watched it for the CGI. The characters only seem annoying now because they were over the top then and moved the goal posts for that over the course of a generation of being repeatedly aired on broadcast television and cable. The plot seems basic now because so many sci-fi movies afterwards we're influenced in some way by it. The 5th Element is a fun bombastic sci-fi romp and you're taking it way to seriously to enjoy it the way everyone that does enjoy it will do. But, you do you. I'm not telling you you're wrong. Sometimes entertainment endeavors fail us, sometimes we fail to enjoy entertainment on its terms because of our predispositions.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's how I feel about 2001 a space Odyssey. I'm sure it was amazing for it's time, but it's so dry and boring. I wouldn't recommend anyone to torture themselves watching it. I know tons of people love it, I just don't get it.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yup I watched this for the first time recently as well, it's in the top 50 films ever made yet I don't know a single person that actually thinks it's a good film.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's unusual in that it requires a bit of extra work to really appreciate how absurdly rich and deep that one is. It's honestly fascinating. And it looks like it was made 30 years ago, which is an absolutely monumental achievement considering it was made over 50 years ago.

Though I can of course completely understand it when people don't want to have to read books and listen to Ted talks about a movie to figure it out.

[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The number of times I've watched a highly rated movie only to find it's not good. cough oppenheimer cough

[–] DarylDutch@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Agree with you on that. Many of the "oscar bait" movies are not that great for just watching. For instance, "the Revenant" was not a great picture in my opinion.

What probably elevates them is watching for all the minutiae in the acting and really focussing on the actors instead of the greater picture. However, I think great moments have to be earned through screemwriting. A great example is "the Wire". Lives caught short, loves truly lost, and a realisation you are just part of a greater machine. These are all earned moments of pure emotion that films often do not get because of their tight focus. I do not mean to encourage film makers to lengthen their movies, please for the love of god, your movies are lengthy enough.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

Reviews after the 2010s or so get increasingly more untrustworthy, because studios realized that box office returns rely on these ratings now. So now paid reviews and bot ratings become much more important for a newly released movie.

Another prime example: the newer avatar has a higher rating than the first.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

watching oppenheimer felt like watching a 3 hour compilation of trailers for oppenheimer. everything was so dramatic, there was no downtime, and they always had some kind of music playing. it felt like every scene wasn’t allowed to last more than 5 minutes

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

My rule is that if the critic score is too high I won't like it, and the audience score needs to be higher than the critic score and we have a banger on our hands