this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
427 points (99.8% liked)

196

6213 readers
2292 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  1. boot something like Hirenz via USB
  2. mount the device Windows MBR maps as C:
  3. extract the rarball onto the mount point
  4. reboot
  5. learn not to dumbass, dumbass

You made up all of those words, except dumbass I suppose. I've heard that one before.

ok but that negates any storage saved tho

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago

Does winrar store ntfs attributes and security settings? If not, then simply uncompressing the files to their original location may not result in a working OS, especially if the registry wasn't backed up because winrar couldn't access it

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think what's funniest to me is he was very close to recreating a real windows feature. You actually can "compress files to save space" under options, and apply it to all child files and folders. This is not the way to do it though lmao

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course any disk space you save by doing that is exchanged for performance and time.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago

Kinda? it depends. Basically all modern CPUs have compression hardware acceleration or idle cores, though so sometimes disk compression can have little to no impact on your OS' speed but increase the bandwidth of your drive by a lot. Hard drives and SSDs are half simplex, so reducing nuisance reads by 10% can make your drive appear faster at both reads and writes.

As an aside, this is why I like ZFS so much. Part of what makes ZFS great is the ARC cache with smart eviction. Most Frequently/Recently Used (MFU/MRU) allows for repeated reads from the same info to come from RAM and not a slow pool. It opens up all of that available bandwidth and IOPs for writes if you need too, or for aggressive prefetching.

[–] thecoffeehobbit@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't realise there's a windows version of sudo rm - rf /

its called windows update

[–] AlboTheGuy@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know I'm stating the obvious but I need to say it. It's so funny to me that even if he succeeded in what he wants to do (unpack from the BIOS?) He'd have the space taken only when the computer was booted, so effectively he'd be unable to use all the freed space.

no clue why u would he the person. but beyond that, the person could mean extract in ram (which equally stupid and most likely not viable but eh)

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An OS in the 2020s should not use 40+ GB. Period.

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 118 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Rookie mistake, they should have compressed the rar file with 7zip to save even more space.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I compress my files with ROT13

Remember the latest NIST standard requires you to do Quadruple ROT13!

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm still amazed at how much 7z can compress. The other day I extracted a 1.5 GB file, and it ended up being 4.7 GB.

[–] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 2 days ago

That sounds like it was a DVD image that was mostly empty space, so any compression tool would have been able to save space. But yes, 7z is still impressive.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago

I compress everything with md5

wrong, should've used 7z or zip under LZMA2 for best compression in this case

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Making a rar archive of your windows folder doesn't leave your OS unbootable...

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

These two would beg to differ:

C:\Windows\EFI\bootmgr.efi

C:\Windows\System32\ntoskrnl.exe

The first is generally copied to the EFI partition but the second isn't. The second one contains all Windows Executive services so good luck booting without it. The windows folder also contains explorer, which is need if you want a graphical desktop, and most drivers.

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who said anything about being without them? It was only stated the windows folder was added to a RAR archive. Compressing files into an archive doesn't remove them, it just creates compressed copies.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and he had space on a "completely full" disk to save an archive of a 40GB windows folder.

[–] biscuit@lemdro.id 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait... Do you guys think someone would really do that? Go onto the internet and tell lies?

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

I'll assume it's a typo. for now.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was something I actually used to do with my one gigabyte hard drive in my Windows 95 machine. Though turning on drive compression through Windows would cause the machine to be soooo fucking sloooooow.

i think u mean using the built-in compression. this mf using external software to create an out of boot file windows.rar and deleting the original. which can never work

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (6 children)

question, is there a way to use compression on the whole system, so files are decompressed on the fly.

Exchange overall storage space for speed?

yeah but it doesn't make much sense

what's actually taking up disk space are images and video, and those are already compressed. you cannot compress already compressed data again, it just won't reduce the filesize. so there's no point compressing everything, because where it matters, it doesn't do anything, and where it doesn't matter, it makes things slow and adds complexity, which is an additional failure point.

[–] Scarlet0952@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 days ago

Some filesystems (like btrfs and ZFS) support comression on the filesystem level, where each block is compressed with some algorithm automatically, completely transparently to applications.

Most modern CPUs are fast enough at the light levels of compression that is used, that usually its also faster, because you read less data, and the read + decompress time is often lower than how long it would have taken to just read more data; though of course that depends on what data exactly, but overal its often faster (though usually its not by a very significant amount) for most average uses.

[–] Everyday0764@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

there are some filesysstems that do exactly this, I use btrfs with compression enabled for example.

It’s existed since DOS. It doesn’t work all that well. But it does work if you’re desperate for space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DriveSpace

https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-ntfs-compression,3073-11.html

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

In short, yes. Windows has a checkbox in the settings somewhere (I think the partition manager? I can't remember now) to enable compression on a given partition, so you can in effect enable filesystem compression on the C: drive. Through the command line you can also compress individual directories with different compression algorithms and I had incredible luck compressing game files with LZX compression with some games compressing down by 3 or 4 times (these were notably games with 100s of gigabytes of user-generated assets. More normal games only saw around a 20-40% reduction in storage space usage, which isn't bad at all)

Outside of Windows there's popular filesystems like zfs and btrfs which support filesystem compression and general encourage it by default because the speed of (de-)compression after reading from disk is almost always faster than just reading the uncompressed data from the disk directly

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

I know the opposite can be done because I did it just recently.

I have a nearing 10 year old set up from when it still made sense to have a 200gb SSD with a 2tb HDD for games. This hard drive is absolutely struggling with these massive games like Baldur's Gate 3 and Cyberpunk (and Baldur's Gate 3 has the annoying habit of not waiting for assets to finish loading before playing a cutscene).

I used this thing called bcache to take a 100gb partition of my SSD to automatically cache the most frequented files from the HDD. Even though Baldur's Gate 3 is 120gbs (which I don't think it needs to be, I think it's poorly optimized) it was still enough to mostly get rid of any loading issues.

To make this relevant to your question, you could get a massive cheap but slow hard drive or even an external drive and use something like bcache to get the performance of your internal SSD.