this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
66 points (95.8% liked)

World News

55913 readers
1682 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The fact global shipping now treats “possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz” as something that can be worked around is honestly kind of insane on its own.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Where does most global shipping go to and from?

China.

Who isn't affected by the closure of the strait at all?

China.

Good work Trump, America First!

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

If that is the explanation, it sure isn’t made clear by this shit article.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

China depends on Iranian oil, which is why Iran tried the partial blockade to let friendly ships through. That forced the US to try and enforce a full blockade to prevent China from being less affected than everyone else.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It’s absolutely epic that Iran found a way for their adversary to enforce the very blockade which their adversary took issue with. Like… holy hell. That’s some boss level shit

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

It doesn't take a genius to win at chess when your opponent is playing checkers and eating the pieces

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

then what is the fucking problem?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

This is a really shoddily written article. Bad. Basically he’s saying that fuel costs will remain high and from a business standpoint the risk doesn’t go to zero just because Trump says everything is rainbows. Therefore shipping faces increased costs, which raises prices for consumers, which hurts demand, which lowers shipping volume. And that systemic slowdown doesn’t disappear overnight because Trump says yippee.

I think. If the article weren’t total shit, maybe it would be clearer.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Fuel/oil Maersk, if I recall, does container shipping and has other ways of moving boxes, but all of them burn fuel

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And oil isnt moving because the straight is closed.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yes, so you’d think that reopening the strait should help. Maybe they just mean not right away? It’s unclear.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 3 points 20 hours ago

Yeah all tankers are now on the way to Americas, because they have oil too. US shale oil is now profitable for instance, they can ramp up production in a month or two and been doing that

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The main issue in the short term was ships being stuck and ships not being able to get to their destinations in there. Now that's sorted out, it's just a fuel cost issue.

It's a dead end in there, you can't get through it like you can through the red sea into Suez. They are more concerned about that channel. That's why the french have a carrier group near there, to protect shipping against the houthis instead of joining the US in it's current mistake.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Another issue is that oil supply is lower due to infrastructure damage caused by the war.