Even back in the day when body mass and explosive bursts of strength we relevant on the battlefield it made no sense to ban women for being women.
Even if 10% meet the physical criteria, why would you disqualify so many potential recruits
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
3989 readers
185 users here now
Rules:
- Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
- No spam or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It made sense to spare women fighting when weapons were strength based and you cared about population growth.
Now everywhere's overpopulated and an 3 year old can be given the means to kill someone.
Yeah! No one's ever been traumatized by a dead male corpse!
/s
Obligatory they/them vs was/were army
Civilization is when misogyny