this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
261 points (98.5% liked)

News

37401 readers
1576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court’s six-to-three Republican-appointed majority issued a staggering ruling on Wednesday essentially killing the remaining protections of the Voting Rights Act, dealing a death blow to the country’s most important civil rights law. The majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito in Louisiana v. Callais strikes down the creation of a second majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana and in so doing narrows Section 2 of the VRA to the point of irrelevance, making it nearly impossible to prove that a gerrymandered map violates the right of voters of color.

“Because the Voting Rights Act did not require Louisiana to create an additional majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of race in creating SB8, and that map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander,” Alito wrote. “The Constitution almost never permits a State to discriminate on the basis of race, and such discrimination triggers strict scrutiny.”

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sherman should have destroyed everything south of D.C. Then, every Confederate politician, military commander and plantation owner should have been hanged.

💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

the mistake was giving EC powers to the rural areas for elections, because they thought it was "margializing them"

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

There's still time...

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

likely the "assasination plot" was a distraction from this , so the news wont cover this and people arnt pay attention to this.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What we need is end the single member only district system, un-cap the house, and where district boundries are used require that they mathematically the fewest counties and municipality as possible.

I would also argue independent commissions of technical experts who only use data saying how many people are in a given area and nothing else.

The Conservatives want to interpret the protected class policy as "we the government must be demographic blind." Alright here is a way to get fully blind. Don't come crying if the result is multi member districts that have representives proportional to the population

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We've had impartial computerized methods of creating fair districts for decades. It doesn't benefit those in power, who are the ones who would have to approve it.

A group should be formed, independent of state or federal, to form districts every few years based on population movement. If a party is disadvantaged by the makeup within that district, then they'll just have to work harder to try and sell themselves as a better choice. The role of a representative is a representation of that area, and should reflect their needs. Not some bigger party goal that needs the numbers.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Personally I more think we need to dismantle the party system we have. Political Parties should form and dissolve fluidly and be more akin to social clubs not actual bodies to dictate policy

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

The supreme court is an illegitimate institution that regularly declares itself arbiter of things it has no business in. It has effectively become first among "equals" in a government of increasingly questionable legitimacy. Doesn't matter whether they do something "good" or "bad" we shouldn't view them as having any legitimate authority in the first place -- Certainly not in elections.

Today they have a voice in gerrymandering. Tomorrow? Will they declare lottery elections illegitimate? More Money is speech nonsense? Can't Tax political donations? Can't tax political advertising? There are ways to make the government legitimate and give it consent of the governed -- but we cannot allow corrupt oligarchs to tell us what is and isn't legitimate.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 34 points 1 day ago

Tired of the endless "who can be the biggest piece of shit" competition we seem to have going on here. You all win okay?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And just like that, there goes the midterm.

Give in to 100 years of Republican rule.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Then it's our turn to insurrection

Are we great again yet? Can it stop?

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 1 day ago

sigh. what more can i say.