this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
236 points (99.6% liked)

science

26827 readers
1058 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
236
Earth… just 5 minutes ago (himawari8.nict.go.jp)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by SpaceFacts@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
 

Before calling it fake, check Japan’s Himawari-8/9 satellite a real Earth-observing satellite that captures full-disk images of our planet every 10 minutes using official space-based imaging, not weather predictions.

This is actual satellite imagery from space… sometimes Earth just looks so unreal that people forget reality can be more stunning than CGI

🔗Check out by yourself https://himawari8.nict.go.jp/ 🔗

Details: https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/satellite/himawari89.html

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 59 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fake. This is just a picture of earth. You could never fit the real earth into a jpg because it's made of rocks and dirt and stuff.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 26 points 2 days ago

𝒞ℯ𝒸𝒾 𝓃'ℯ𝓈𝓉 𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓊𝓃ℯ 𝒯ℯ𝓇𝓇ℯ

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can tell because of the way it is.

[–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Thats pretty neat!

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know how Quantum Field Theory suggests that everything is a field at the smallest possible levels? The idea that everything exists “on average,” because quantum fluctuations are constantly… well, fluctuating?

What if that evidences the idea that you don’t need solid matter in order to produce solid matter? What if you can just simulate emergent relationships from the bottom all the way up? At the bottom, it’s just bits. Kind of like how, at our bottom, it’s just fields.

Then, in that reality, maybe you can put the Earth in a jpg. To its human occupants, they’d have no way of knowing.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This suggests that the magic bag of holding may be possible too

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What about black holes? The event horizon’s area scales with mass (∝ M2), but don’t some modern theories posit that the internal space can behave very differently over time and produce more space?

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, black holes might also be possible.. I'm learning a lot

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Do you think it would be fair to argue that the universe itself is such a case, too, given entropy? If you can start with the big bang, with time as your function, you’re producing more space within a closed system that started with the singularity. Not sure that’s fair though, because maybe entropy is a constant? I don’t know.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

How did the satellite take this picture? We should send another satellite to take a picture of how the first satellite took this picture to confirm the validity of the image.

Edit: my dumb sleep deprived ass tried to rotate the earth on that satellite website 🤦‍♂️

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry I tried to rotate it too and I'm not sleep deprived. But yeah it seems to be in a geostationary orbit so it always shows the same side of the Earth.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can't believe they're not letting us move the satellite around, smh

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'll contact their webmaster and file a bug report

for real shaking your head too

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

I read this comment and the comments below it, chuckled, then opened the link, marveled at the marble, and then tried to turn it.

I'm going to sleep now, good night.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can confirm, I was there and am in this image

[–] msage@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

Location confirmed. Get him, boys!

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

see? It's flat!

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Site does not load without JavaScript

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bullshit piefed says this post is almost an hour old youre a liar

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmmmm, can't even get New Zealand in a satellite photo

[–] asret@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

We do manage to get in at the edges of both the Himawari and the GOES-WEST satellites.

https://www.metservice.com/maps-radar/satellite/tasman-sea-infrared will almost certainly be from Himawari.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Neat. The thumbnail seems to update, too. The card view was different than the thread header. Almost feels unreal to see the cloud flow because I haven't seen such an image set before.