this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
383 points (76.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11420 readers
2370 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 222 points 4 days ago (59 children)

I hate this argument every time I see it. It could be used to justify so many terrible prejudices that we’ve been trying to get rid of for decades. I got robbed by a black man once so should I now treat all black men as potential criminals?

[–] kartoffelsaft@programming.dev 87 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You put into words thoughts that I've been unable to for a while.

Like, I read this and I see how someone makes this argument, but I feel fucking terrible afterwards. Sure you haven't said I'm a rapist, but you've said you'll treat me as though I am. You can't expect men as a demographic to agree to this argument if it requires society to assume they're shitty people, at which point, why is it even being made?

The worst part I feel is that there's a lot of incel types that conflate feminism with sexism, which we'd like to school them by pointing them at a dictionary. While incels are generally shitty, we can't ignore the fact that this argument is telling them their behavior doesn't actually matter because we're going to act like they're rapists based solely on their malehood anyways. (to be clear, this is an explanation, not a justification)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There is a distinction between a prejudice born of bigotry, and a prejudice born of a real fear and trauma. And while I understand your point, the difference between these two directly affects how we can effectively address them societally.

To start addressing it, we can't just keep admonishing traumatized women. We have to understand where the prejudice comes from. The reality is that women need to be on guard constantly, not because of all men, but still specifically because of men.

They are continuously exposed to stories like the Rape Academy website, see sexual violence normalized in media, encounter rape threats online, and virtually all of them have either experienced sexual assault themselves or know someone who has.

And while this is not all men, or even most, the statistics are clear: perpetrators of violence and sexual assault against women (and against men) are overwhelmingly male. Since there is no reliable way to identify which men pose a threat until it is too late, it's unsurprising that many women develop a prejudice as a safety mechanism.

It's unfortunate that this can harden into bigotry, but it's even more unfortunate that the threat giving rise to it exists at all.

Your analogy of being robbed by a black man "once" actually highlights how widely the pervasiveness of this threat is misunderstood. For women, this isn't a single incident. It's a lifelong threat most acute during their formative years.

So by way of a counter analogy: would you admonish a black person who grew up in the American South during the Civil Rights era with "not all white people" or "not all cops"? Or would you recognize that their wariness was, prejudiced or not, a rational response to a very real danger?

I agree that we should strive toward a society where no one is judged on anything but the content of their character. But it's worth noting that countless men rush to admonish frustrated and traumatized women with "not all men," while far fewer show up when stories like the Rape Academy actually break. This imbalance is itself part of the problem.

And if we as men, and as human beings, want to see less of this prejudice in the world, perhaps the more productive question isn't whether the prejudice is fair, but why so few of us are doing anything to make it less necessary, and why so many of us are more interested in pushing back against women's reactions than addressing the cause of them. And this, for me, calls to mind MLK's observations about the white moderate...

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have a friend who is a woman who insisted that it's a majority of men who do things like grope women on dance floors or exhibit other such sex pest behaviors.

I pushed back on this because I quite strongly believe that not to be the case, and pointed out that encountering such men a majority of the time when going out doesn't require a majority of men to behave that way. An incidence rate of, say, one in twenty still virtually guarantees you'll run into multiple if you're in a crowd of sufficient size.

I'm also not trying to downplay the seriousness of it being a very real problem. Nor do I deny her lived experience of encountering that behavior often when going to concerts or whatever. Literally just pointing out that such an experience doesn't require a majority.

She got offended, calling me out for not believing her and accused me of making a "not all men" argument to try to invalidate what she was saying, despite explicitly agreeing that it's a problem that needs addressing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (56 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm a feminist and I don't get this argument at all. There are plenty of dangerous women too so all women as well? It makes no sense and it's pure toxic femcel delusion.

Also as an ex-professional scuba diver: the shark analogy is a great illustration how stupidly inaccurate this argument is.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 22 points 3 days ago

Sharks are cool. Its sad to see, that they have the image of being bloodthirsty human killers, while statistically speaking you are more likely to get killed by a coconut falling down a palm tree then by a shark.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 96 points 4 days ago (3 children)

OK. I was abused by a woman. And know of many cases of abusive women (men too, but we've already decided in this context that all men are dangerous, so that's beside the point). So this means all women are dangerous, too?

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 41 points 4 days ago (2 children)

unfortunately yeah

do women statistically commit as many violent and/or sexual crimes? no. but some still do

I've been made fun of (lightly, but still) for letting friends know when I'm going home with a strange woman (which I shouldn't do at all but do anyway for various reasons). Strangers are strangers, you never fuckin know

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 48 points 4 days ago (1 children)

do women statistically commit as many violent and/or sexual crimes? no. but some still do

Even that assumption I've started questioning. My abuser never appears in any crime statistics, because it's not particularly easy to prosecute a case that is mostly based on psychological torture, since the crimes are hard to prove, easily dismissed as "just a bit of nasty behavior" and have relatively short times within which they have to be reported in order to be prosecuted, depending on the country you're living in. If on top of that you're a man and the abuser is a woman, have fun getting anyone in charge to legitimately believe your story. It doesn't diminish the violence that occurred, I just barely survived it.

Certain kinds of abuse are vastly underreported. Domestic, psychological and sexual violence (which are not exclusive categories, by the way) belong to these kinds of abuses. Some statistics say northwards of 40% of domestic abuse victims are men, for instance. Well at that point, we're kind of close to parity.

So let's focus on reducing violence entirely. Because another thing I've learned: while the individual elements of abuse tend to differ between men and women, the patterns are almost always very similar.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. It'd be nice if people could just... stop fuckin abusing each other. Gender differences are part of the conversation but we should be discussing it in ways that raise awareness and equip people to recognize, report, and reduce violence. Not in ways that just cause more fuckin arguing and division. Which isn't easy. I certainly have fucked up my rhetorical approach to these things, I think. But we should try, at least :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The problem is equating males to sharks. The exact same arguments have been directed at ethnic groups in the past.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

All Palestinians are terrorists

All gays are pedophiles

All men are dangerous

Obviously all this is stupid and dumb and inherently hateful, the following is what it should be

Any Palestinian could be a terrorist

Any gay could be a pedophile

Any man could be dangerous

There we are, perfectly non problematic statements that are objectively true. Its not my fault that I'm a terrible judge of character and have to treat any individual belonging to those groups as if they were the lowest common denominator. I'm just protecting myself and you need to respect that you fucking fascist.

[–] baines@piefed.social 70 points 4 days ago (2 children)

trash like this always ruins all nuance

might as well be justifying racist stereotypes or calling women gold diggers

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

Point out the double-standard and watch keyboard pseudo-feminists do mental gymnastics to justify their own moral pedestal...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Reminds me of this:

"If I had a bowl of skittles and I told you just three would kill you, would you take a handful?" said the tweet on the verified @DonaldTrumpJr handle.

"That's our Syrian refugee problem," said the post, which caused a stir and negative tweets on the internet into Tuesday.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/donald-trump-jr-likens-syrian-refugees-poisoned-skittles

Are you sure THIS is how we should think?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago

As per usual it's a stupid analogy. It assumes that only bad things can happen and the best you can hope for is a not poisoned skittle, it totally precludes the possibility of a beneficial skittle. But of course it does because the Trump family deals exclusively in zero-sum games, it's either all or nothing with these idiots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 40 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean maybe it's because your statement was explicitly "all men are dangerous", not "men are dangerous"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

I used to think this way, "hey it's not all men"! That was until my wife was roofied in a bar. Luckily I was there, just in the bathroom, and when I came out the coward bolted away, but it shattered all of my illusions about my own gender.

She put her drink down for less than 5 seconds, at her table, with other friends there. They were distracted for a split second while he put something in her drink. God knows what would have happened if I wasn't there.

Men, we all need to understand that it may be a few bad apples, but a few bad apples spoil the bunch. Women have to keep their guard up because one slip, 10 seconds of being distracted is all it takes. Before that incident I never thought about how guarded they have to be.. all the time. It's insane. Even that instance she was with corowrkers and her fiance was there! She hadn't talked to anyone else and still it happened to her! We never have to worry about things like that. Hell I'm pretty sure just this week I set my drink down and went to the bathroom, and still it didn't cross my mind to check.

Men bad because, yes, men are real fucking bad. There's people out there who literally do try this shit, and as a woman meeting people they don't know who you are or what you'll try. It is not as simple as "Why don't the trust us"? Because some of us slip roofies into drinks, that's why. Real men will see that and vow to punch those fucking cowards in the face, watch their female friend's drinks for them, and many other things.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 31 points 4 days ago

There's a place a few towns over, it's like organized rape. The bar owner is in on it, bartenders and the bouncers. They all help drug women and help the rapists. Cops are called every week, they don't care and are possibly engaged in the same activity. It's been years. Known as a rape bar. I highly doubt this is the only one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Ok so as a man what am I supposed to do about it?

That's the part I don't understand, if women would prefer the bear over the random man (who's statistically probably fine) that's not much good for the species is it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 17 points 3 days ago

I just want to say, it's not just about femicide, rape and that sort of stuff. Men being dangerous is a spectrum, and those are the high points, but sexist comments, pressuring, bargaining, and much more can also be part of the spectrum.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago (19 children)

I'm ok with women expressing this sort of sentiment, so long as they're also ok with guys making generalisations about women in the same vein -- ie "There are enough of 'this type' of character out there, that you gotta be defensive and assume any could be".

Saying all men are dangerous is fair, it's also fair to say all women exploit men for financial gain. I don't know many men who've dated for a while, who haven't come across women clearly just seeking free meals, gifts etc; ones who'll judge you based solely on income.

That said, it's prejudice in either case to assume that an individual of either gender is either of those things just because you've acknowledged the risk is there. Like if your store is constantly robbed by one specific ethnic demographic, it's human nature to be suspicious of any member of that demographic when they come in -- but you'd cross into racism if you explicitly treated them like thieves prior to them being shown as a thief at an individual level.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

It's not fair in either sense imo. Agree with your last paragraph - we are setting back fight for equality with these dumb meme rage bait statements. This is not the way no matter how you look at this issue. It's just rage bait.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Are you scared that your husband will hurt you? If yes why are you with him, if no then not all men could attack you. "All men are dangerous" is a logic so flawed that any argument for or against it is meaningless either in substance or intention.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 28 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Also sharks are awesome, they are older than trees, have important ecological roles and most sharks won't attack any humans. Some even can befriend you, like a toothy puppy.

The ones that do, tend to do it for curiosity and dislike us because were boney and hurts their teef, it is not their fault that we have the bad habit of bleeding out when we're in the sea.

As analogies go, this is a bad one:

  • You can easily learn which sharks are dangerous.
  • You will be warned when you go swimming in a dangerous area.
  • You can even take precautions that reduce substantially that danger.

I don't think it is as easy understanding when someone might hurt you, and it is not like you can choose to have your date be in the water while you chat them up from a boat.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Shark attacks are also extremely rare. Dogs would be a better comparison, in that they can be extremely dangerous but most of them are not which is why we keep them around.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

This doean't feel like a microblog meme.

[–] core@leminal.space 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Thats basically saying all men are rapists, you just don't know which one is going to rape you.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (6 children)

When you go through a safe driving class, they teach you to assume everyone else on the road is an idiot who can't drive. This isn't because they are, it's because it's safer to approach it that way.

In scouts you're taught that if you encounter a carrion animal, you should assume it has rabies. Not because rabies is common, but because you really don't want to be the rare case of rabies.

When you're learning how to handle firearms, you're taught to assume all guns are loaded until you've personally checked and cleared it. This isn't because guns magically manifest bullets as they're handed from one person to another, it's because it's safer to make sure than to hope someone else didn't make a mistake.

The only reason this is any different is because it makes weak men feel the same way they want to make everyone else feel.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 12 points 3 days ago

This is just the Bayesian approach; overall men have high enough tendancy for aggression and sexual assault that from a risk analysis point it makes sense to be on your guard until you get to know that person better. Of course media has a bias for presenting the awful stuff that happens in the world, one would rarely get coverage of a heart warming relationship between two people involving atleast one man. So these priors despite being in the correct direction might be biased too.

But I think, neither the shark anology or the expression "all man are dangerous" is useful for getting this point across though.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just so I understand. Feminism can lump every male into a neat little box, and that's considered ok? I think there's a word for that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wait till you find out about which demographics of men are your statistical danger, gonna turn that misandry into racism or classism real fast

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TimMadisun@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I agree with the sentiment, yes, there are dangerous men out there. But this is a terrible analogy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›