this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
376 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

84143 readers
2289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fijxu@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Really good blogpost, as a sysadmin, this is a great way to handle a migration with zero downtime.

When I was migrating my servers to NixOS I did the same thing, I tried to make my configuration the same as the old OS so everything works cleanly, and it worked fine, but since it was all in the same server, I had to do manual migration for things like files and databases.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Always nice to see people moving away from enshittified US services.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Ok so if I'm reading this correctly: They migrated from an OS and MySQL version receiving no updates since at least 2 years to MySQL 8.0 which will stop getting updates in 4 days. Also every service is running without any containerization and there is a single database for everything... and it all runs on a single host and I didn't read one word about a backup strategy or disk encryption. Also not a single word about infrastructure as code like ansible so that you can reliably recreate the system... and The whole stuff is hosted in Germany for a Turkish software company - sounds like very good latency.

My personal conclusion: This system WILL fail and the guy who designed it is stuck somewhere 10-20 years in the past.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Sounds like my homelab has better redundancy than these guys, and my monthly bill isn't much different than their new one. I only pay for power and networking, since I own my own hardware. I'm colocating in my city, so my latency to home is about 1ms, and I've got a full mirrored server in my house. Certain files are further backed up elsewhere for proper 3-2-1 backup (+ each server running raidz2 with disk encryption). Even if my home Internet goes out, I still have full access to my files at home, and all my public services stay running in the data center. If either server fails, it's all set up with containers so it's easy to spin up each service somewhere else.

One thing that's tricky to get right with disk encryption (especially with encrypted /boot) is having a redundant boot partition. I was able to hack this together by having sofware raid duplicate my boot partition to a second drive. Now if I remove either OS boot drive it falls back to the remaining one. To prevent breaking EFI boot, you need to use the Version 1 RAID format so the metadata is stored at the end of the partition, not the front where EFI reads.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

every service is running without any containerization and there is a single database for everything... and it all runs on a single host and I didn't read one word about a backup strategy or disk encryption.

Man, a paragraph that can give someone some serious PTSD flashbacks....

The number of times I've had to clean up a customer's environment after they let little Billy play corporate IT and things went boom.....

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Once the dump was complete, we transferred it to the new server using rsync over SSH. With 248 GB of compressed chunks, this was significantly faster than any other transfer method:

rsync -avz --progress /root/mydumper_backup/ root@NEW_SERVER:/root/mydumper_backup/

that's a bit weird. rsync -z is compression, but they did compress in the mydumper export already, so this is a slow down (or neutral at best). also in my experience rsync is as fast as scp is as fast as piping anything to the tcp port on the destination etc. rsync does not win for speed but for enabling resume so to say...

besides this: nice read!

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Not a sysadmin but just an hobbyist: is it ok to have such a large install bare metal and not containerized?

For example the issue of MySQL 5 being unavailable would be a non-issue with a container

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

For example the issue of MySQL 5 being unavailable would be a non-issue with a container

So people careless enough to "just container it" for old, possibly security-compromised software - you call that a "non-issue"? How about upgrading and configuring for compatibility?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

They're the ones running a 10 years old database on a 11 years old os in a public facing server "because it just works", not me

If it was a container, they could just tag a new version when the database went EOL 5 years ago, without being locked on what the package manager was offering

Because they used MySQL 5 on CentOS 7 from the package manager and couldn't easily upgrade

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yes it’s ok, in general. It’s not the most modern or efficient way of managing infrastructure but it’s worked for decades now. It all depends on what you’re hosting, for who, and for how many people.

If you’re hosting internal company infrastructure for a relatively static number of users in a single of set few regions to deliver to, bare metal monolithic stuff is absolutely fine. It’s when you’re an app or service company and your infrastructure is for the back end for a public service that needs to be able to scale dynamically, and you’re worried about high 24/7 uptime, and latency to end users is a global issue that things like microservice architecture, containerization, and iac starts becoming important.

The whole containerization crazy is important for microservices architecture where you split your app into different pieces. This lets you scale different parts of you app as needed, it prevents your entire app from failing just because one part of it failed, it allows for lifecycle management like blue/green deployments with no downtime, allows developers to work on different parts of the app and update at a faster cadence than one big release for the entire thing every time you update one small part of it, things like that.

[–] recursivethinking@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

you can just set up containers on your bare metal server. in fact if you're going to install insecure services you definitely want to containerize them, though tbh you need to run really far away from whatever it is you're doing that requires sql5, or at least don't let it be reachable on the internet, that should be network-isolated, which really limits its utility.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

in fact if you're going to install insecure services you definitely want to containerize them,

While this is true, if you're running a platform that is root by default (looking at you, docker), you're not shielding yourself as much as you might think you are.

If you're running an insecure app as root, you better hope they don't also have an exploit to get out of the container after the app is popped, otherwise you're fucked.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 52 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Me running everything on a single postgress instance on my shitbox 0€/month

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 34 points 18 hours ago (13 children)

0? My energy company says I'm using power equivalent to a family of eight. And it's just wifey , the servers and me. I had cops here asking if I grow weed 😁

So unless you steal power, it surely isn't close to 0 😁

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

I realised I don’t need my servers being online 24/7, so for me that’s Raspberry Pi and equivalents, plus powering on computers on demand.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

A trick I realized a few years ago: Caddy has a module you can build it with that does WOL. So I was able to run a Caddy reverse proxy that woke up my higher powered server on demand, and let it go back to sleep when I wasn't using it. Might be a bad idea for a database sever, but for my uses it was pretty simple and effective.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

… that woke up my higher powered server on demand, and let it go back to sleep when I wasn't using it.

Get a load of this guy not using his high powered server 24/7/365.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh wow, that’s really cool! I do use Caddy too.

Is it that your service/website is on both (low powered server and high powered one) or is it only on the high powered? So, it’s like

  • the lower powered server knows it needs help (sounds a bit surreal to me, but perhaps it’s doable)
  • or the lower powered server does not serve anything, but wakes up the high powered when the thing is accessed?

I guess that’s the 2nd thing, but it’s very cool indeed! That way you can really have very convenient things for free, as it’s super cheap to run any hardware for a very while on demand. I don’t mind waiting a minute or even two when I need to access something very infrequently and don’t want to run my server 24/7. I do exactly that, but I wake up it via LAN manually.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The low powered server is the Caddy server, all it does us act as a reverse proxy for everything in my house, giving it an SSL cert and doing things like WOL. The caddy config basically just says "Here's your reverse proxy target, if you don't get a response within one second, send a WOL packet, wait a couple of seconds, then try again".

The only requirement is for you to do a custom build of caddy (this is done with a dockerfile), and to have WOL enabled on the high power server.

It means the first web request for services on the high power server might take a few seconds, but everything after that is smooth.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Is it that high power server takes a few seconds to boot? What’s the hardware you have there? I’m curious that’s the average boot time for an average high power server? I do use heavily obsolete devices for my personal servers (think of DDR-2 era devices with Intel Atom or sometimes core 2 duo devices) usually without even SSDs. With an SSD, my desktop devices (all DDR-3 era with SATA-3 disks) boot within 20…30 seconds, which is good enough for me. I assume the more modern devices would be quicker, but [single-digit, I assume] seconds sounds very good. To me, that sounds like it’s a no-brainer to have this feature. I was thinking whether I can wait minutes for something I need occasionally to boot. Seconds is just too fast. I think that delay is tolerable even for a commercial / production server, where the expectations are just different.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm not shutting it down, just sleeping it. My high powered server is a gaming PC from a few years ago. Running Linux, my best case scenerio for cold boot would still be 10-20 seconds, but wake from sleep is near instant.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

I also self host and I wouldn't say the cost is zero. In the UK, energy costs alone mean that a 40W computer cost £8 per month to run (assuming a 28p/kWh price).

Of course, that's assuming you run it 24/7 at full energy use, but I know my PCs run on more than that.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 42 points 22 hours ago (12 children)

I'm in the US and when I tried migrating from DO to Hetzner, I got asked to upload my passport to prove I'm not spam or something. Same experience with OVH.

Is this a thing for all European hosting companies? I ended up finding some Canadian hosting that would just let me sign up and pay like normal.

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 19 hours ago

When I signed up at Hetzner, I had to go through the same anti-abuse check. However I could choose to not upload my ID and pre-pay 20€ instead. Did that and have been a happy customer since.

[–] rjek@feddit.uk 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of respectable EU hosting companies, and also aparently OVH, if they think there's a chance you're taking the piss will ask for a ID so they can ban you. It's not just anti-spam, it's anti-abuse and for preventing non-payment. They think there was a risk involved in accepting your business (whatever that may be, obviously companies don't dilvulge their criteria here), and if you go elsewhere they're not upset about it for that reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

nice writeup

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Wait until you learn that Hetzner can and will take your public IP away at their own will without any warning. Happened to me.

One downtime is enough for me to never use that service again, no matter how cheap it is.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 13 hours ago

Copy Paste since I am lazy:

“ They suspected me of serving “illegal” traffic. The server was located in Germany and they were contacted by typical DMCA lawyers, who were referencing a US District Court Order.

Hetzner blindly waved that through and just took my public IPv4 address.

At no point they were trying to contact me. At no point they asked themselves if a US District Court Order has any validity. At no point anyone of Hetzner explained what happened. At no point they apologized for their obvious mistake.”

[–] inzen@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting, why did it happen?

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

They suspected me of serving “illegal” traffic. The server was located in Germany and they were contacted by typical DMCA lawyers, who were referencing a US District Court Order.

Hetzner blindly waved that through and just took my public IPv4 address.

At no point they were trying to contact me. At no point they asked themselves if a US District Court Order has any validity. At no point anyone of Hetzner explained what happened. At no point they apologized for their obvious mistake.

[–] SMillerNL@piefed.social 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like it would have been a good moment to split the database from the many web servers and reduce the single point of failure.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 12 points 20 hours ago

And get some replication in there. Even if there's not a single point of failure, if a DB instance ever goes tits-up, you'd better have a standby.

Source: I've cleaned up others' messes where they didn't.

[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

what it feels like charging my phone from my laptop

load more comments
view more: next ›