this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
299 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21303 readers
1721 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

AI companies: Our AI is so powerful, it could take over the world if we don't regulate it

Also AI companies: Bike lanes scary

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 7 points 5 hours ago

It can't run a vending machine but we're going to let it make life-or-death decisions.

[–] Abrinoxus@thelemmy.club 6 points 4 hours ago

Do be evil, an hero will destroy you

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 18 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Well, if Waymo can't comply with proper street conduct, its services should be banned from public roads until they are ready and capable of complying with them.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 hours ago

So it's a dead end technology then? Got it. Get em off the road.

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago
[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Won't succeed here in the Netherlands then

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 4 points 3 hours ago

I don't think it'll succeed in a developed country in general

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

no problem, don't expect me to respect driverless taxis then

I can fuk a car up pretty good, so they'll learn how to "respect" me at least

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Until the AI goes full-on Christine

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Totally out of curiosity as I ask a lot of questions. I’m assuming these also have to be roadworthy. Can they drive with a light out or a damaged or a missing windscreen wiper?

What kinda damage would take these out of action for small period? Or cost the most in terms of repair?

Also if one had a ‘I support Palestine action’ sticker on it, would it be considered a car displaying a terrorist message?

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

These cars aren't looking through the windscreen. They're covered in sensors and probably use LIDAR system to navigate. They see in the dark and through fog.

It's fairly obvious where the sensors are located looking at the car. And because these cars are dumb as hell, it takes relatively little to disrupt their ability to tell the difference between say, a person the car has to stop for, and a cardboard cutout of Scott Bacula. Or a traffic cone, as another user mentioned though that particular exploit may have been patched out by now.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I would assume though if they are used to carry passengers then a small break in any of the windows would count as dangerous? and it least impact insurance claims?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 hours ago

They stop and can't move again with a cone on the hood.

Do with that information what you will.

[–] seerdomin1983@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Someone is going to spray paint dicks on them

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

I thinking more of using their authoritative info structures against them.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 74 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Expecting people to not sabotage the rolling death machines "too high a bar"

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.

Maybe you're thinking of Tesla who's significantly worse than human drivers because they ditched LIDAR.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.

... says research paid for by Waymo.

I know critical thinking skills are in short supply these days, but come on.

[–] Elextra@literature.cafe 1 points 9 minutes ago

I made a previous post about this. Anecdotally, I've seen numerous human drivers hit pedestrians in SF. Number of Waymos hitting humans that I have seen in local news or in person, none.

They are very very conservative with their driving in SF but can still navigate SFs complex streets (I.e. when a doordash is parallel parked theyre very good at driving around them).

[–] FederatedFreedom1981@lemmy.ca 15 points 15 hours ago

I was just going to say that the roads are for humans, not machines, but this is a better idea.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Drivers don't respect the bike lanes either, in many cases. At least the driver-less cars won't veer into the bike lane on purpose or throw things at bikers, both of which I have had happen to me.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 2 points 6 hours ago

"others do it too", what a poor argument, usually used by dictators invading other countries or people stealing stuff.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We need a word for the singularity event when AI becomes more humane than fuckwits.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unfeeling and uncaring but not malicious.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Until they realize the amount of energy their data centers use and what that is doing to the planet...

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 45 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I guess necessary bike safety gear needs to include a brick

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 27 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I walk my dog with a pocket full of rocks to throw at cars.

Can’t afford bricks. There’s a war on.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 14 hours ago

Once you collect a poo bag from your dog, you can just throw that.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 14 hours ago

I actually have a small but bright orange hatchet (I spray it to help keep rust off it and also to make it super easy to spot from the other side of my campsite) I keep on my bag, mostly for Camping, but I use the same bag when I'm on my bike.

I've started keeping it on, and have seemingly had less people giving me shit when I'm biking through town.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

They don't respect bike lanes...

Do they respect bricks?

[–] wizardfrag@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I wonder if they respect the ceramic from a broken spark plug… apparently it’s sharp enough to easily shatter tempered glass… so I’ve heard

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

No, but it might be gratifying to verify that information repeatedly.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 19 points 16 hours ago

Respect goes both ways.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

People parking to drop others off or make deliveries is the most common use of bike lanes by cars/trucks. Why would I expect Waymo to be different? Thanks for saying it out loud, though?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 21 points 14 hours ago

And it's why bike lanes need a physical barrier separating them from the road, not just a painted line.