this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
315 points (96.7% liked)

xkcd

16295 readers
170 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

xkcd #3237: Husband and Wife

Title text:

Borat came out twenty years ago this year--closer to the breakup of the Soviet Union than to today--but it honestly feels like it's been even longer, somehow.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3237/

explainxkcd for #3237

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robinadams@lemmy.wtf 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I would not have thought of Borat without the alt text. My mind went to Henry Youngman "Take my wife... please"

Randall Munroe loves to do these "x was closer to y than today" comparisons and while they're interesting they dont help with the existential thinking

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

"Lady of the manor" if you really want to take the piss

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A solution is "my partner". Although I don't use it myself, I think it's a better term, if the relationship is a good one.

[–] thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago

That's good when you're not married. "My spouse" is a good neutral term when you're married

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 14 points 1 week ago

I have an announcement to make.

Shadow the hedgehog is a bitch!

He pissed on my fucking wife. It's true, he took out his hedgehog dick and pissed on her. And then he said it was "this big" and I said "that's disgusting!"

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The title text is necessary on this one.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

It explains the "my wife" reference, which isn't immediately clear from the statement about "my husband". At least to my pop culture illiterate brain.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Just say partner. It's a better description of what a marriage should be AND it's gender neutral

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's wrong with spouse? Have people forgotten that thesaurus exist? Spouse is already gender neutral, literally means married partner, and doesn't sound like a corporate speak buzzword to make the drones feel like family.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Spouse sounds dumb.

What corporation calls their employees partners?

[–] AscendantSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AND you get to say 'howdy' when you see them

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is there an American first person plural for "y'all"?..."We's"?

"Us" and "we" exist in the language already.

y'all or you'ns or yinz or whatever evolved to fill a niche. English has an official second person singular, thee/thou/thy and the funny thing is thou canst still perfectly understand it, it makes perfect sense to thy ears, even my spell checker isn't flagging any of this. But we don't use it anymore because it sounds pompous and biblical, plus for some reason it comes with a bunch of fucky conjugations. Like "canst."

French does still use theirs, tu vs vous, tu is singular but also informal, you speak that way to individual friends and loved ones, vous is used for plural as well as in formal speak, even if singular you say vous to your boss. English deprecatedest thou entirely and went entirely "you" which leaves too big of a gap. So Americans took "you" to be the new singular and invented "you all" and "you ones" in parallel for plural, slanged to y'all and you'ns the latter has no consistent spelling.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes! And you've nailed one of the most common.

Mind you, none of the ones I've run into reach the degree of usage y'all does.

But, there's we's, we'ns, and us'ns

This is all in my local area, or in areas close enough to have visited frequently.

No idea what yankees use for dialect first person plural, but we'ns down hyuh have it figgered out right nice.

However, if you want the dialect mind fuck of all mind fucks, wait until someone needs to address a large group of mixed sub groups and breaks out "all'a y'all'ns" which is said as a single unit all'a'y'all'ns. All of you all ones. It's like a black hole of linguistics that sucks you in, and the closer you get, the more spaghettified your brain becomes.

They ain't nuthin much more sigogglin than suthren talkin, an if'n it's in the hills (aka mountains), y'all gonna have ta step quick ta keep up. Shit far (fire) and save matches, y'all damn feriners done missed out on some got dayum good talkin!

[–] Wilson@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

To the north (still solidly east coast) I would occasionally hear all'a'you's and allyouse for a similar purpose.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Weesa acutally’bin’ talking like JarJar okieday!

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Always sounded weird and corporate to me. Easiest to just ask what your SO would prefer to be called and not worry about what people might think when you say it

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Partner sounds corporate...?

If anything, it sounds more scientific

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It seems to be, at least partially, a generational thing.

I grew up in rural, conservative-town USA and am old enough to remember when "partner" was code for same-sex spouse that I'm not legally allowed to marry.

Whereas if you were in a state where you were allowed to marry your same-sex spouse, then they'd be your husband/wife.

Hearing it now, regardless of orientation, just sounds deliberately vague to some of us oldheads.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

A Singaporean woman was the first person I heard refer to their opposite-sex partner as "partner" back in probably 2010 and I adopted it. I had a pretty skewed idea of marriage as a kid and it instantly changed my thinking.

Your spouse SHOULD be your partner. You're on a team facing this big stupid world together.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For me it'll always be Kimura-sensei from Azumanga Daioh: "MAI WAIFU"

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Ah just when I had forgotten he exists. I don't like thinking about this guy lmao, his existence is cursed.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

"High school is high school!"

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't even remember borat saying my wife as a significant part of the stick.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Shtick

shtick /ʃtɪk/ A shtick is a comic theme, gimmick, or characteristic routine that a performer or person habitually uses to get attention or laughs.

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

The movies plot revolved around making Pamela Anderson his wife. The first scene he introduces his wife, then there's the scene in the middle when the guy brings a telegram saying she died. And he fed Congressman Bob Barr some cheese that he said his wife made with milk from her tit. He probably says the phrase a dozen times in the same inflection.

There's also a scene in the show where he introduces his wife, his other wife, his mistress, his sister, and the one he has to pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

And for centuries after the bombs were dropped and all human life extinguished xkcdbot kept plugging along, posting the ancient texts. Its karma points have dropped a bit since human extinction, but it is undeterred.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You’re probably right, but I can’t get this one out of my head.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It has been far too long since I’ve watched this beauty.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rewatch time! You’re welcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] monkeyman76@fedinsfw.app 4 points 1 week ago

Papa Lazarou was where I went, glad I'm not alone..

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Ohhhhh youre my wife nowwwww

[–] chrisbtoo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] garibaldi_biscuit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

For me its the track from the " who's next" album 1971

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought this was referencing Will Smith at the Oscars until I read the alt text.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The comic says "After two decades"...

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Was Borat before the Will Smith thing? I don't know. The past is such a long and windy place.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Huh. Never saw it.

Another win.

[–] JimmyChanga@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thought he meant Adam Buxton

[–] Rug_Pisser@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately I'm not sure Buckles is quite the cultural phenomenon that Borat was. I am sure he's okay with that though.

load more comments
view more: next ›