this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
351 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29093 readers
1857 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"Pentagon officials discuss what to do if Trump were to attempt to deploy the military domestically, CNN reports"

"After CNN reports, the Trump administration discusses how to replace all Pentagon officials, CNN reports."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No worries, with project 2025, anyone not completely loyal to Trump or a minority will be retired in order make the military great again!

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

After which the military will be so ineffective we won't need to worry about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

He should have been arrested last time. Now we have to hope a soldier or officer has enough of a spine to destroy his career by so much as telling the Cheeto in Chief "no."

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Changes made to dod policy in September allows him to use the military domestically upon request of local police force.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which would still violate the posse comitatus act

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 17 points 1 year ago

I want to move for a bad court thingy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ would you people stop citing on the books laws as if they mean ANYTHING now. Trump and his people will do whatever they want, the law be damned. Ink on a page in a law book means nothing to them now.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

He's not even right about what he's citing.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No. Just no. That's been completely blown out of proportion. It's a reissue of a decades old memo to update intelligence sharing. It's for groups like the Defense Intelligence Agency.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Like when he orders the execution of Mark Milley? It will perhaps be one of the most significant moments in US history where we either stay the US or become Turkey.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why he wants Hitler's generals instead. Much more suited to his style of governance.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I hope the generals succeed in their attempts this time.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You record it and impeach him

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If everything he does, per SCOTUS, while President is legal, than what do you impeach him for? Also, you guys voted in a red House and Senate, so that's not happening on a good day.

I'm getting very tired of happy happy joy joy style and unrealistic posts. We need to talk raw reality here, people.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›