this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
71 points (96.1% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2581 readers
55 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
sabreW4K3@slrpnk.net
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
Sunshine@piefed.ca
71
BYD confirms UK's fastest EV chargers: 1500kW network detailed (www.autocar.co.uk)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/electricvehicles@slrpnk.net
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The chargers will be open to every car manufacturer and will use the universal CCS2 charging infrastructure.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is very impressive, I just saw a Youtube video from Sweden about how insanely fast these new BYD cars charge 10-70% in 5 minutes!!!

Meanwhile the new Tesla model Y that supposedly charge at 250 kWh, has one of the worst charging curves in the market, and drops off to only 100 kWh already at 35% charge level!!

The new Tesla cars are actually worse than the old ones, because Tesla is using their own inferior battery design made for the Cybertruck, that Elon Musk used to rave about how amazing would be, but gave them so many problems to manufacture, and apparently this never got completely solved.

Anyone who think Tesla is still a market leader or even just still a good option must be unaware of how bad Tesla is now compared to the competition. Tesla did some cool things early on, but they are nowhere near what their marketing is claiming.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Do they come with a nuclear power plant embedded? Jokes aside, how is the electricity network going to handle such loads?

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

lots of solar a and large batteries adjacent from pics I've seen

still, need to build out as we "electrify" everything, it'll be chicken egg, egg chicken for some time.

Hell, KFC in China is doing a JV with BYD and high speed charging, wjo knew that was a problem to solve.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHfhQtEpkG0

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You have to consider that the amount of power needed is the same, it is just delivered quicker for the individual car.
But spread among thousands of cars it all evens out, making the power delivery required mostly the same.
Slower charging just means more cars are charging at the same time, and 50 cars charging at a lower rate is the same as 10 cars charging 5 times as fast, but also only a fifth of the time.

So for the network it's the same, it's only for the individual charger that there's a real difference.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it's most definitely not the same for the network. The sizing of everything in electrical infrastructure - generators, transformers, cables, protection devices - is bound to the current going through them. When you deliver the same energy in a much quicker time, you can only do so by increasing the current. Which means that, unless people are charging in low demand hours (e.g. at night), your infrastructure will either buckle or "shed loads". Load shedding is when a circuit is dropped to prevent the overall network to brownout. Better not place the chargers in the same circuit as hospital and homes for the elderly!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

False, the chargers have transformers, and I bet charging stations with 20+ chargers have local transformer stations too.
For one transformer station to supply for instance 12 chargers at 100 amps each or 4 at 300 amps each is both 1200 amps.

When you deliver the same energy in a much quicker time

You obviously completely failed to understand my explanation that this is not what is happening on the scale of charging stations with many available charging slots.
Obviously these 1,5 MWh charging stations will not be availbale at you local grocery store, they are part of bigger installations with probably already around 20 charging slots of 300-400 kWh charging capacity.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd assume charging stations number is the same with some or all at higher power. But yes, reducing the number would solve power demand.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a very different issue, that would be caused by the increasing number of EV. And that issue would be the same with or without faster charging.
Without the faster charging, obviously more stations are needed.
As I already stated, the charging speed has very little impact on the cumulative load on the grid.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

It's not exactly the same. Space where you put charging stations is usually limited. With higher power chargers, the entire charging infrastructure will require more power. Which means "thicker" cables. Sure, globally the power requirement are the same.

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Probably the same way it's handled when someone builds a new factory.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Some of the high power ones have batteries that they essentially use as a buffer. Recharge them when idle, then use them as extra capacity when charging cars.

Apart from that, I'm not sure. Probably the same way other consumers are handled How much peak power does a large apartment building, office, or factory use?

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

the devices can be powered by on-site battery packs topped up by solar panels.

I believe this is the case for a lot of the very fast chargers, it's easier to install batteries pack to smooth the consumption rather than upgrading the grid to handle the occasional peak consumption.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Pushing 1.5kW is going to get dangerous when the chargers and cars age.

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 2 days ago

1.5MW, not kW.

[–] UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

Is it actually "pushing"? I've always thought the consumer is "pulling".