this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
509 points (93.2% liked)

196

6193 readers
1510 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

but seriously, look up photopea

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 156 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

Honestly I would tell people like this screenshotted poster to suck it up or go fuck themselves, because this is free software that is provided for you as is and for use as you wish. If you think the software isn't "adjusted enough" to meet your needs, then place requests for features in the relevant channels, be patient and try to work with the existing tools on offer, or keep shelling out booku bucks for Adobe's continually enshittifying service.

Accept your fate with the corpos instead of bitching that the community effort options aren't in your Goldilocks zone, shitbag.

God, this is why I hated Apple users at my old IT job. They'd bitch about the continually enshittifying status quo of their software and platform, and in the same statement reject all alternatives for not being "a smooth transition".

Edit: on a more positive note, Kritia, FreeCAD, and Kdenlive are all great and multiplatform.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 44 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Rugnjr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

Inkscape kicks ASS god i love Inkscape

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think it's OK to complain about free software on social media. It's also OK to tell people that sometimes, if they want something to be better, they might need to be the ones to roll up their sleeves and make it happen. But not everyone has the time or the technical wherewithal to fix every tool they use. I sure couldn't implement every improvement I ever thought of for free software, I don't have the time.

But I think It's still nice, for maintainers and for people thinking about getting into open source, to get a rolling feel for what gripes a lot of people share about open software. If I have a problem and I know a lot of people share my frustration, I'm much more motivated to try to fix it than if it's something I and no one else care about.

[–] mech@feddit.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it’s OK to complain about free software on social media.

I think it's like complaining about a free product someone made in their own time and then delivered it to your doorstep.
If you don't like it, OK, don't use it. This isn't something you bought. Using the thing doesn't help the dev in any way, unless you also donate or contribute.

We live in a time where private FOSS devs of popular projects get buried under AI slop bug reports from multi-billion-$ corporations who use their work without paying, and death threats on social media if they made an unpopular change to the thing they put out there for free.

I think it's more akin to complaining about the public transit in a city where the public transit funded via donations. Yeah, you could pitch in, and maybe you do, but it's still a massive undertaking that is also massively underfunded, and even if you have an idea of what you want to change, you might not have the skills to fix it yourself, or even to file an actually helpful bug report. Should you learn how to engage with the process of opensource tool maintenance? Yes! It's a cool and fun thing to do. Is it hard for most people who aren't familiar with software development? Also very yes.

To be clear, I don't think maintainers have any obligation to see or think about whatever gets posted to social media. Trying to stay on top of what the internet is saying is an impossible task. But as a user and sometimes contributor, I like reading about what trials other users are going through, and if a complaint resonates with me I like to chat about it, and occasionally I'll pull down the source code for a project and see if I can figure out how to patch whatever it is we're talking about. For most of these cases I'll give up or get distracted before I have anything worthwhile to contribute, but every once in a while I'll get a PR submitted that spawned from a random conversation on the internet.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago

That belongs in a feature request though, not on mainstream social media. I'm not going to comb through feeds to try and figure out what bugfixes or features need priority development.

I would even go as so far to say actually placing the request in the proper place matters more than donations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not the same, the idea is that you are suggesting things that are not suitable replacements. You can't then say "bUt ItS fReE sOfTwArE" as it that makes it a suitable replacement.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's the kicker though. The poster framed it as Adobe was the only game in town that was abusing them, a friend told them about a service that was free and had their entire feature set, but it was rejected due to UI and platform concerns.

Not all free software will reach feature or UI parity with their proprietary competition. That's just reality. However, if you are paying a grand total of $0 for the alternative and have no interest in being constructive either through submitting a feature request or contributing code (donating doesn't have an obligation for anything so in this circumstance that wouldn't factor), then you should just either accept the software "as is" (which is a key component of most licenses), or accept that it's not for you.

Stay with the devil that you know if you disregard positioned alternatives for not being "suitable enough", and if you want to change that, be proactive and open-minded. Not bitch.

[–] accideath@feddit.org 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I read it more as a critique on the self-satisfied recommendation for something that just isn’t the drop in replacement they’re making it out to be.

Don’t get me wrong, I love foss software. 3 out of 4 computers in my household run linux and I‘ve converted a handful of people already.

However, I couldn’t and wouldn’t replace photoshop with gimp/krita, premiere or davinci with kdenlive, etc. for the time being. Not because they’re bad but because I use them professionally and cannot take any risks. Adobe is shit but their software is a known quantity.

Privately, I would never pay for Adobe (not paying anyways, my boss does). And for personal use and maybe smaller (somewhat tech savvy) freelancers, I‘d absolutely recommend everyone at least try the FOSS alternatives.

But, I‘d never go „um akhtshually, foss program xy is just as good as adobe program xy“. Because while they might be as powerful in theory, that doesn’t help if they’re a hurdle to use.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's a fine, nuanced take. I think the key part is that accepting that you are using a flawed option because it's critical for your employer's standard practices or required for a client's needs (or is the only option that is acceptable to said employer or client) is perfectly fine. You are accepting that the enshittified software is aggravating and not what you'd prefer, but aren't dismissive of alternatives and would consider them if you had the flexibility to.

What I'm trying to poke at here is people finding the "perfect savior" to their existing tools that were made out of choice (that enshittified) or complacency (unwilling to move until they find something that is effectively a reverse engineered clone). Of course, that usually doesn't exist, so they whine about how "FOSS doesn't match everything I want!" despite being capable of learning and not truly bound to their tools by say an employer.

"Hurdle to use" (In my opinion) is just the outcome of being used to the old platform rather than poor design by the developer (even if some FOSS projects may need some UI love).

[–] accideath@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

There are indeed a lot of people who completely dismiss good things because they’re not perfect.

But I‘d argue „hurdle to use“ goes a bit further.
UX is obviously a part of that. It’s the main reason you can’t make me touch gimp, for example.

But, on top of that, a lot of those foss programs require a more involved setup, especially if you want all features to work. Getting hardware de-/encoding to work in kdenlive, for example, isn’t necessarily something everyone can easily do but something that’s absolutely necessary for professional use.

And of course there’s the endless gamble, whether the foss community will happily aid you or curse you, when you’re asking for guidance.
Or if the tutorials and documentation need you to use the terminal for setup or certain features.
Most paid software has both a large community of users (forums, tutorials) and is polished to an extent that every idiot can install and start using it.

That’s what I mean with hurdle. I’m personally tech savvy enough, that I could deal with any problem that might occur, even if I‘m not willing to learn a developer designed UI, but lots of people I know would not.

That’s why, for example, for video editing software, I love to recommend DaVinci resolve. It’s closed source but it’s free, polished n powerful. (And in my humble opinion better that Adobe premiere in every single way). Good software doesn’t have to cost anything, but it also doesn’t always have to be foss either. There’s a middle ground.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think this is a needlessly combative stance. If your goal is to get new users to engage with the development side, calling their criticism "bitching" isn't going to do that. Most software users don't have the first clue about software development and wouldn't even know what exactly to say if given a suggestion form. The best feedback a lot of new users can give is "the user experience is clunky and unintuitive".

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My stance has been forged by the repeated disappointing interactions that I've had with people who I spend painstaking amounts of time illustrating how to solve their problems with these tools and why a certain design quirk is the way it is vs. the proprietary model.

Without fail, the kinds of users like the screenshotted poster will look at me with a blank face or reply in forum chats with the same statement: "But can't they just make it usable like [enshittified software] instead?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 16 points 2 weeks ago

Seriously fuck the boot lickers.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This person wasn't saying that software developers are awful for not tailoring FOSS to their specific desires, they're venting about something that frustrates them. People should be able to vent without someone telling them to fuck themselves

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 123 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I see this genre of post going around a lot, and it just reeks of learned helplessness.

Yeah, I get it, sometimes you're stuck in a situation where, for whatever, the alternatives aren't viable or practical. You feel trapped. We all do. But why is the first instinct to gripe at the cool free software for not being quite what you wanted instead of getting mad at the rapidly enshittifying megacorps that put you into this trap you're in to begin with?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 2 weeks ago

that, and it reeks of consumerism and a desire to feel superior.
"haha those stupid nerds and their shitty nerd software, i'm much more sensible for using corporate software that actually works (except it doesn't but ignore that)"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

The great free software that works on windows and I have personally tried (some are only free for personal use, but others are completely free):

Have not tried

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some of those are free as in beer, but not free as in freedom. Relevant distinction to keep in mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Linux only? Yes please. Do you know your distro waifu/catgirl/catboy? It rules.

[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago

kin tukult je'el u páajtal u sa'atal ti' teech Jayp'éel jaatso'ob ti' le ecuación

[–] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'd like to file a complaint, my distro didn't come with a catgirl? ☹️

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I run NixOS. Mine came with too many. We can share.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

linux only isn't even a problem, just use wsl lol

[–] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 30 points 2 weeks ago

If you don't want to face the inconvenience of learning something new to escape the grasp of technofeudalism suffer in silence, serf

[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This reads like someone who just isn't willing to learn whatever new workflow the software requires. If that's the issue, then that person will never leave their enshittified walled gardens. There is no workflow that matches or imitates the one you learned, it's probably copyrighted, you're best bet is to jump ship and learn a new paradigm.

Also, have yet to run into an alternative that's actively recommended which doesn't at least have a windows build. LibreOffice, Krita, Blender, Darktable, GIMP, Audacity, Inkscape, and Openshot - the most common recs as alternatives to apps, all have windows as an option.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hesh@quokk.au 28 points 2 weeks ago

Skill issue

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no slight inconvenience, how will he ever deal with it

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More languages should be glyphic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cybercafe@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

I would love to be free of Adobe CC, but unfortunately this is the case. The alternatives are getting better, the gap is closing, but it is still there. Adobe's time will come, but it's not soon enough.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

To be fair, open source apps usually have terrible UI

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, there are lots of FOSS projects that have very obviously never had input from an artist or UI designer. The Venn diagram of “people who have the programming skills to make good FOSS” and “people who know how to design a good UI” consists of two almost entirely separate circles.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

There’s also the attitude that you’re seeing in this thread, where if people had a problem with UX the response from the devs is basically “skill issue, git gud”

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

At least UIs are standard now, back in my day (and still some today) people would make everything a CLI and then bitch at you when you told them that their very computationally efficient video trimming tool is cool and all, but editing video from the terminal is worse than CBT.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

would make everything a CLI

What do you mean? There is nothing wrong with a CLI tool.

editing video from the terminal

Okay, I can get behind that.

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Hot take: adobe products also have shit UI and are actively being made worse; it’s just that people are used to it (at least until adobe decides to change something again)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Ngl learning new UI is pretty easy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A lot of people in this thread getting real defensive about objectively shit FOSS UI/UX. It's not just driven by corporate familiarity or laziness, it's a pretty major shortcoming in open source projects that never gets addressed because we constantly downplay it.

Designing for user experience isn't solely Apple's modern consumerist method of dumbing down, hiding complexity and smoothing corners for the largest audience. Human centered design is a deeply researched field going back to (at minimum) the second industrial revolution. Tool ergonomics, assembly line efficiency, poka-yoke design, control panel layouts for nuclear power plants, etc, etc.

I'm not asking for a design masterpiece every time but just glance at some UX guides. Require a UI review process beyond "I like how it looks". And please, God, please condense your settings menus and make them searchable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] becausechemistry@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

My recommendation was always the Affinity suite. One-time reasonable purchase and it was great. Definitely not the engineer-designed UI this post complains about. ~~One problem: Mac only.~~ I have been corrected, it was cross-platform too!

But now, it’s free! And available for PC! Except it was acquired by the Canva people so they’re probably gonna fill it with subscriptions and slop soon. Bummer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Swapped Adobe Audition for Reaper. No regrets

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see Resolve has just moved to challenge Lightroom too, which is kinda of amazing.

Between the affinity apps, reaper and Resolve there's a fairly competent replacement set for Adobe apps on windows.

I wish Linux was as good.

My main gripe is the lack of professional typesetting software. Scribus just doesn't cut it.

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My main gripe is the lack of professional typesetting software. Scribus just doesn't cut it.

LaTeX /s/s/s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] thagoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›